Cases

In an action to recover the proceeds of a policy of fire insurance, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated December 18, 1987, as (1) denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and (2) granted those branches of the plaintiff’s cross motion which were to strike the defendant’s third, fifth and eighth affirmative defenses. Ordered that the order is modified, by del

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 26, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant worked part time as a sales associate for the employer. Although the initial terms of her employment had changed, the last change was implemented in December 2002 wherein c

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant Public Service Mutual Insurance is obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Employees Motor Corp. and its employee Raphael Torres with respect to a personal injury action brought against them by the plaintiff Sadiat Bello, the defendant St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated November 2

BROWN, S.J., BACKGROUND In two Pennsylvania Superior Court decisions the relevant facts and procedural history of this case has been set out: First, in an unpublished memorandum decision, William J. Rhodes, Jr. and Carrie E. Rhodes, his wife, v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, filed on January 31, *4982008 (951 A.2d 1225

899 F.Supp. 1155 (1995) Jennifer GERMAN and Wellington German, infants by their Mother and Natural Guardian Ana Maritza German, and Ana Maritza German, Individually, Plaintiffs, and Marcus Coran and Raniqua Smith, infants by their Mother and Next Friend Denise Goffin, and Denise Goffin, Individually, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Intervening Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP., Property Services Company, Caisi M

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiffs, a class of residents of New York City housing, have moved pursuant to Rule 23(a)(4), Fed.R.Civ.P., to add the David and Franklin family plaintiffs as class representatives, and to amend the class definition to include residents of housing owned by Defendant the City of New York (“the City”) and residents who aré pregnant women. Plaintiffs also moved pu