Cases

OPINION Sweet, D.J. Defendants The Bear Stearns- Companies Inc. (“Bear Stearns”), James E. *448Cayne, and Warren J. Spector (together, “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16, 26, and 37, to strike the revised expert report (the “Revised Report”) of Dr. John D. Finnerty (“Finnerty”) served by Plaintiff Bruce S. Sherman

PRISCILLA R. OWEN, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Paul Suarez for his involvement in a drug trafficking conspiracy and for firearms offenses. Suarez appeals contending that the convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence. He also asserts that the district court erred in imposing a 120-month (ten year) mandatory minimum prison sentence for possession of a sawed-off shotgun in furtherance of

*213MEMORANDUM * A class of Network Commerce, Inc. (“NCI”) shareholders (collectively, “Sherman”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its complaint alleging that NCI violated Section 11 of the 1938 Securities Act. We affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part. 1. In her complaint, Sherman alleges that NCI failed to disclos

*213MEMORANDUM * A class of Network Commerce, Inc. (“NCI”) shareholders (collectively, “Sherman”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its complaint alleging that NCI violated Section 11 of the 1938 Securities Act. We affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part. 1. In her complaint, Sherman alleges that NCI failed to disclos

357 S.C. 243 (2003) 592 S.E.2d 307 Paul SHERMAN, Appellant/Respondent, v. W & B ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent/Appellant. No. 3701. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard June 12, 2003. Decided November 24, 2003. Rehearing Denied February 20, 2004. *245 Gerald F. Smi

649 N.W.2d 783 (2002) 251 Mich. App. 41 Janet C. SHERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEA RAY BOATS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and K & M Boating Center, an assumed name of South River Marine, Defendant. Docket No. 227450. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted March 5, 2002, at Detroit. Decided April 26, 2002, at 9:10 a.m.

Tom Glaze, Justice. In March of 1993, appellee Sherman advertised the sale of her 1983 Oldsmobile in the newspaper. Her ad asked for $2,500, but she hoped to get $2,200.00, which is what she believed the car was worth. Appellant Ge Zhan responded to Sherman’s ad. Sherman permitted Zhan to test drive the car which was parked in Sherman’s driveway. The car was on a slope and when Zhan entered the car, she p

7 P.3d 131 (2000) 198 Ariz. 122 In re PAUL M. No. 2 CA-JV 99-0064. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. June 15, 2000. *132 Chris M. Roll, Cochise County Attorney By James E. Sherman, Bisb, Attorneys for State. Margaret L. Macartney, Cochise County Legal Defender By Joel A. Larson, Bisbee,

[1] OPINION [2] This case is before the court on appeal by the defendant, the State of Rhode Island, from a November 19, 1987 order of the Superior Court granting the estate of Paul K. Sherman pre- and postjudgment interest on an April 22, 1987 judgment rendered against the State in a civil suit. The defendant also appeals a November 19, 1987 order of the Superior Court allowing the guardian ad litem's attorney to collect a fee of 45 percent of the gross verdict. We fi

928 S.W.2d 897 (1996) James Cobble TRUST, by, Paul SHERMAN, Trustee, Respondent, v. David WILSON and Helen Wilson, Appellants. No. 68562. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. September 10, 1996. Kenneth C. McManaman, Cape Girardeau, for appellants. Jeffrey P. Dix, Jackson, for respondent. AHRENS, Presiding Judge. In this b

[Cite as State v. Sherman, 2021-Ohio-2894.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL SHERMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

129 P.3d 542 (2006) 110 Hawai`i 39 CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation of the State of Hawaii, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. James M. SHERMAN, also known as James Malcolm Sherman, and Akiko S. Sherman, also known as Akiko Sakiyama Sherman, as Trustees under that certain unrecorded James M. Sherman and Akiko S. Sherman Revocable Trust dated May 2, 1989; Jan Camille Bellinger, Trustee

975 F.2d 867 White (Sherman)v.Korb (Stephen R.), Washington (Robert), Burton (James R.),Galloway (Louis), Baker (Ruben), Nix (C.C.),Grossheim (Paul W.) NO. 92-1835 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Sept 15, 1992 Appeal From: S.D.Iowa 1

512 Pa. 14 (1986) 515 A.2d 1327 Donald L. ELLIS, Jr., and Jeanni E. Ellis, Individually and as Guardians of the Minor Donald L. Ellis, III, Appellants, v. Alfred J. SHERMAN, M.D., John G. Goedecke, Robert E. Stevenson, M.D., Donald F. Post, M.D., Sherman Associates, Paul A. Wengert, M.D., James E. Jones, M.D. and James Daly, M.D., Appellees. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Valspar Corporation’s Motion to Remand [Doc. No. 4], brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the motion and remands this case to Hennepin County District Court. II. BACKGROUN

Opinion issued March 26, 2009 In The Court of Appeals For The

JAMES LAWRENCE KING, Chief District Judge: In this appeal we examine golden parachutes 1 and corporate control from an insurance law perspective. A Florida corporation’s board of directors adopted golden parachutes for several key executives. After change in corporate control opened the parachutes, a disgruntled shareholder instituted a derivative action, alleging that the parachute payments were

330 Pa. Superior Ct. 42 (1984) 478 A.2d 1339 Donald L. ELLIS, Jr. and Jeanni E. Ellis, Individually and as Guardians of the Minor Donald L. Ellis, III, Appellants, v. Alfred J. SHERMAN, M.D., John G. Goedecke, Robert E. Stevenson, M.D., Donald F. Post, M.D., Sherman Associates, Paul A. Wengert, M.D., James E. Jones, M.D. and James Daly, M.D. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

BROWN, Judge. This is a suit for damages arising out of a rear-end collision between a left-turning Dodge van and an 18-wheel tractor-trailer. Plaintiffs appeal, challenging the jury’s apportionment of fault and amount awarded for damages. FACTS On February 17, 1989 at 8:00 a.m., plaintiff, Donna A. Sherman (Sherman), was driving a 1979 Dodge van east on Highway 2 in Union Parish when

DAUKSCH, Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit for a real estate broker’s fee. *953Upon a review of the evidence it is our conclusion the trial judge erred in directing a verdict against the plaintiff because the question of whether the plaintiff was entitled to a fee was a factual question only the jury could decide. It is not for t