Cases

CANADY, C.J., dissenting. The majority grounds its exercise of jurisdiction on express and direct conflict, asserting that the decision on review, Crane Co. v. DeLisle , 206 So.3d 94 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) -which applies the Daubert11 standard codified in revised s

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN Z. LEE, United States District Judge In this asbestos personal injury case, Defendants Crane Co. (“Crane”), Exxon-Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”), Owens-Illinois, Inc. (“Owens”), and the Marley-Wylain Company (fik/a Weil-McLain)1 (“Weil”) have variously moved the Court to bar Plaintiff Charles Krik (“Krik”) from calling certain expert witnesses a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John Z. Lee, United States District Judge In this asbestos personal injury case, Defendants Crane Co. (“Crane”), Exxon-Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”), and Owens-Illinois, Inc.1 (“Owens”) have variously moved the Court to bar Plaintiff Charles Krik (“Krik”) from calling certain expert witnesses at trial. Before the Court for decision are multiple mot

* * * * * * * * * * * Upon review of the competent evidence of record, with reference to the errors assigned, and finding good grounds to receive further evidence, the Full Commission, upon reconsideration of the evidence, reverses the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, and enters the following Opinion and Award. * * * * * * * * * * * PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFEN

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS OPINION IS DEPUBLISHED UPON GRANTING OF PETITION FOR REVIEW. THE OPINION APPEARS BELOW WITH A GRAY BACKGROUND.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1021 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1022</

53 Cal.4th 335 (2012) 135 Cal. Rptr. 3d 288 266 P.3d 987 BARBARA J. O'NEIL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CRANE CO. et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S177401. Supreme Court of California. January 12, 2012. *341 Waters Kraus & Paul, Paul C. Cook, Michael B. Gurien; T

JjMcMANUS, J. In this appeal, Crane appeals the sentence she received pursuant to her plea of guilty to one count of theft. Because the record of the multiple offender proceedings, though Crane’s multiple offender status seems to have been admitted as part of the plea bargain, are so deficient, we must remand the matter to allow the trial court to make another record of these proceedings. STATEMENT OF THE C

776 N.E.2d 892 (2002) 333 Ill. App.3d 768 267 Ill.Dec. 520 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David A. CRANE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-00-0682. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. September 23, 2002. Rehearing Denied October 10, 2002. *

141 S.W.3d 401 (2004) KC EXCAVATING AND GRADING, INC., Respondent, v. CRANE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, W.H. Koch, Inc., William H. Koch, individually and as trustee of the William H. Koch Trust Agreement, and PHYLLIS L. KOCH, individually and as trustee of the Phyllis L. Koch Trust Agreement, Appellants. No. WD 62271. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. June 29, 2004.

721 N.E.2d 657 (1999) 308 Ill. App.3d 675 242 Ill.Dec. 378 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David CRANE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-97-0761. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. November 15, 1999. *660 David Crane, Hillsboro, pro se. Paul A

NUMBER 13-23-00541-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG SASHA STURDIVANT CRANE Appellant, v. ROBERT H. CRANE, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 476TH DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS

269 S.W.3d 460 (2008) Elizabeth PETERS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. M & M FREIGHT TRANSPORT, INC., and Paul David Morgan, Defendants, and Memorial Hospitals Association, Defendant/Respondent. No. ED 90432. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. September 23, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November

295 S.W.3d 5 (2009) Raymond SOMERS, derivatively on behalf of EGL, INC., and Vivian Golombuski and Platinum PVA Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and Platinum PVA Fund, Appellants, v. James R. CRANE, Milton Carroll, James C. Flagg, Frank J. Hevrdejs, Paul W. Hobby, Michael K. Jhin, Neil E. Kelley, Sherman Wolff, Centerbridge Partners, L.P., The Woodbridge Co. Ltd. and Nominal Defendant EGL, Inc., Appellees. Raym

399 F.Supp.2d 1028 (2005) Paul YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. ALL ERECTION & CRANE RENTAL, CORP., Dawes Rigging & Crane Rental, Inc., Defendants. No. A4-04-15. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Northwestern Division. November 15, 2005. Rockne W. Onstad, Onstad Law Firm, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff. Patrick W. Durick, Pearce & Durick, Bismarck, ND

ORDER MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Senior Judge. This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for judgment upon the administrative record and plaintiffs motion for a change of venue because of a lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, for judgment upon the administrative record.1 For the reasons set forth below, the court transfers this case back to the Unite

886 N.E.2d 1035 (2008) Lisa L. COLLINS, as Special Representative of the Estate of Stanley Collins, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellant, v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, and Cummins-Allison Corporation, Defendants and Counterplaintiffs-Appellees (St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, Third-Party Plaintiff; Michael Fluherty, Third-Party Defendant). No. 1-06-3601. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fi

282 S.W.3d 33 (2009) M.W., Petitioner/Respondent, v. Robert B. MABRY, Respondent/Appellant. No. ED 90771. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. February 17, 2009. *35 Alan E. Freed, Paule, Camazine & Blumenthal, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant. K. Lee Marshall, Michael Duvall, Hannah F. Preston

603 F.3d 837 (2010) MIDWEST CRANE AND RIGGING, INC., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. No. 09-9520. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 27, 2010. Kurt S. Brack of Holbrook & Osborn, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for Petitioner. Sushma Soni, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, DC (Tony West, Assist

*572 ORDER PER CURIAM. Natural father, T.A.F., appeals from a judgment entered after a bench trial appointing his child’s maternal great-grandmother as the child’s guardian. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and res

PER CURIAM: This appeal of a summary judgment presents a question of “seaman” status under the Jones Act. Kevin Baye, a crane operator assigned to the derrick barge FRANK L, was injured while attempting to moor the FRANK L to a cargo vessel in the Mississippi River. The district court, finding that Baye’s “duties do not take him to sea,” denied seaman status to Baye and granted summary judgment for Baye’s employer, Crane Ope