Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Payne v. Freeman Transit, LLC”
Freeman v. Statepublic domain
Darryl Edward Freeman v. State of Maryland, No. 24, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Hotten, J. EVIDENCE – MARYLAND RULES 5-701 AND 5-702 – DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN LAY AND EXPERT TESTIMONY The Supreme Court of Maryland held that testimony by a police officer who opined regarding the definition of the slang term “lick” did not fall under Maryland Rule 5-702. Ragland v. State and its progeny instruct that a witness must be qualified as an expert under Maryland Rule 5-702 when their testimony is b
Freeman v. Statepublic domain
Darryl Edward Freeman v. State of Maryland, No. 24, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Hotten, J. EVIDENCE – MARYLAND RULES 5-701 AND 5-702 – DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN LAY AND EXPERT TESTIMONY The Supreme Court of Maryland held that testimony by a police officer who opined regarding the definition of the slang term “lick” did not fall under Maryland Rule 5-702. Ragland v. State and its progeny instruct that a witness must be qualified as an expert under Maryland Rule 5-702 when their testimony is b
Sonmez v. WP Company, LLCpublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 22-CV-0274 & 22-CV-0301 FELICIA M. SONMEZ, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
Rel: December 22, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM, 2
Erie Insurance Company v. Weiman Products LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ERIE INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o : CONSTANCE DREW, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 20-0917 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 18
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Great West Cas. Co. v. TERMINAL TRUCKING CO., LLCpublic domain
803 F.Supp.2d 389 (2011) GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. TERMINAL TRUCKING COMPANY, LLC, Wellman, Inc., Milliken & Company, Wilson Sutton, and Travelers Property and Casualty Company of America, Defendants. C/A No. 0:10-cv-121-JFA. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division. March 22, 2011. *390</
*1296O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom RADER, Chief Judge, REYNA and WALLACH, Circuit Judges, join. District judges, both parties in this case, and the majority of intellectual property lawyers and academics around the country will no doubt be surprised by today’s majority opinion — and for good reason. The major
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Benedict v. Hankook Tire Co.public domain
Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on HANKOOK TIRE COMPANY LIMITED'S AND HANKOOK TIRE AMERICA COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 62). The Court previously denied Defendants' motion in its ORDER (ECF No. 221) dated November 27, 2017. The following Memorandum Opinion sets out the reasoning for having done so. I. BACKGROUND
Simmons v. Textron, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CHARLES SIMMONS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 21-cv-1077 (APM)
Hinton v. Virginia Union Universitypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Virginia Union University’s MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (Docket No. 3). For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.- *812BACKGROUND Plaintiff Terry Hinton
Huntsville City Board of Education v. Frasierpublic domain
On Application for Rehearing MOORE, Judge. This court’s opinion of November 30, 2012, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. The Huntsville City Board of Education (“the HCBOE”) appeals from a hearing officer’s decision reversing the HCBOE’s action terminating the employment of Ann Frasier, Jodie Lindstrom, Johnna Lamelle, Rene Robinson, Deborah Hatton, Bryant B
Anatol Zukerman v. USPSpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 7, 2020 Decided June 9, 2020 No. 19-5168 ANATOL ZUKERMAN AND CHARLES KRAUSE REPORTING, LLC, A D.C. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the Di
Graupner v. Nuvell Credit Corp.public domain
VINSON, District Judge: This case involves interpretation and application of the so-called “hanging paragraph” in Title 11, United States Code, Section 1325(a)(9), which was added to the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. See Pub.L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 23 (2005) (“BAPC-PA”).1 Specifically, we are called upon to decide if th
Biundo v. Boltonpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Biundo v. Boltonpublic domain
2020 IL App (1st) 191970 THIRD DIVISION September 9, 2020 No. 1-19-1970 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT FARA BIUNDO, as Special Administrator of the Estate of
Carroll v. Trumppublic domain
24-644 Carroll v. Trump UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2024 (Argued: June 24, 2025 Decided: September 8, 2025) Docket No. 24-644 E. JEAN CARROLL, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
Ramos v. Nielsenpublic domain
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge In 1990, Congress passed and President George H. W. Bush signed the Immigration Act of 1990, creating the "Temporary Protected Status" (TPS) program. See Pub. L. 102-232 (1991). The TPS statute codifies a long-standing practice: "every Administration since and including that of President Eisenhower has permitted one or more groups of otherwise deportable aliens to remain temporar