Cases

Filed 8/18/25; Certified for Publication 9/8/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOHN DOE R.L., F087142 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 22CV-04187) v. MERCED CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Filed 12/17/14 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, F067838 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. SUF20408 & v. SUF20409) RANDY LYNN PAYNE,

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Levin, J. (dissenting). The question presented concerns the scope of judicial review of a decision of a municipal civil service commission. I would hold that a decision to discharge a civil service employee after a hearing is subject to judicial *719review, pursuant to Const 1963, art 6, § 28,1 to

*188 MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge The plaintiff, Forest County Potawatomi Community, a federally recognized Native American tribe located in Crandon, Wisconsin, filed ten requests, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C, § 552, for informati

767 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2011) David F. JADWIN, D.O., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF KERN, Defendant. No. 1:07-CV-00026-OWW-DLB. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 24, 2011. *1077 Eugene David Lee, Law Office Eugene Lee, Los Angeles, CA, Joan Herrington, Bay Area Employment Law Office, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiff. M

ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 943 OPINION Defendant County of San Diego (County) appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs Western Mobilehome Association and its members, John J. Binkinz and Trailrancho Corporation, on their motion for summary judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c).

Baldwin, J. This was suit to recover a lot in San Francisco, the plaintiff deraigning title through a grant made by an Alcalde after the conquest or possession by the authorities of the United States. The defendants questioned the validity of this grant. We considered this question in the recent case of Hart v. Burnett. We held in that case: “ First, that San Francisco was, at the date of the conquest and cessi

Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint filed on behalf of defendants. (Doc. No. 9-1.) A hearing on the motion was held on December 18, 2018. Attorney Mark Merin appeared in person on behalf of plaintiffs. Attorney John Whitefleet appeared telephonically on behalf of defendants. Having reviewed the parties' submissions, and having heard from counsel, de

CHAVEZ, J. *1040Plaintiff and appellant Tara R. Burd (plaintiff) appeals from the judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent Barkley Court Reporters, Inc. (defendant) after the trial court granted defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings in this putative class action for charging excessive court transcription fees, in vi

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND CLASS CERTIFICATION (Doc. 230) LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. Introduction Defendants Calcot, Ltd. and Robert W. Norris (collectively “Calcot”) and Eadie and Payne (“Eadie”) (collectively “defendants”) move to amend and clarity the definition of the class that was certified in this Court’s August 5, 2009 Order on Plaintiffs’ Renewed

Cantil-Sakauye, C.J. **748 *833 *598 Under California's in forma pauperis doctrine and Governmen

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ RENEWED CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs.114, 120,134) LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. Introduction Pursuant to an amended notice filed on May 29, 2009, plaintiffs Andrews Farms and Greg Palla (collectively “Plaintiffs”) renewed a motion to certify a class action in this matter, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. P

Filed 11/29/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO TARA R. BURD, B271694 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC556703) v. BARKLEY COURT REPORTERS, INC., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Super

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Plaintiff Laura M. Laughlin has sued defendant Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his capacity as Attorney General, for gender discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and age discrimination under the Age Discriminatio

Lawrence J. O'Neill, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL Judges in the Eastern District of California carry the heaviest caseloads in the *1197nation, and this Court is unable to devote inordinate time and resources to individual cases and matters. Giv

Case: 24-1823 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ROBERT A. PRESSLY, ET AL., Plaintiffs JASON BREHM, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 202

IRMA CARRILLO RAMIREZ, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *586By Special Order 3-251 , this pro se case has been automatically referred for full case management, including the determination of non-dispositive motions and issuance of findings of fact and recommendations on dispositive motions. Before the Court are the following:

630 F.3d 833 (2010) Estera L. TAMAS; Ruth S. Tamas; Monica, by and through her court-appointed guardian for purposes of litigation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES, State Of Washington; Marschell Baker, individually and in her official capacity acting under *834 the color of state law; Joyce Drake individually and in her official capacity acting under the color of state law;