Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Pearce v. The Duchesneau Group, Inc.”
Pearce v. Duchesneau Group, Inc.public domain
392 F.Supp.2d 63 (2005) Desiree PEARCE, Plaintiff, v. THE DUCHESNEAU GROUP, INC., David Michael Duchesneau, Brant P. McGettrick, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 04-11409-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 8, 2005. *64 *65 Sara B Davis, Matthew J. Tuttle, Perkins Smith & C
Smith v. Zipcar, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, Chief-Judge, I. INTRODUCTION This case stems from Plaintiff Michael Smith’s 47-day employment at Zipcar, the Boston-based car sharing company. While Plaintiff was negotiating his executive compensation package, which included stock options, Zipcar was contemplating a possible merger with Avis Budget Group (Avis). ■ When the merger later went
Bryan Corp. v. Chemwerth, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT JUDITH GAIL DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of an agreement pursuant to which the plaintiff, Bryan Corporation (“Bryan”), agreed to purchase the pharmaceutical ingredient Tobram
Bryan Corp. v. Chemwerth, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT V (FRAUD) OF COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of an agreement pursuant to which the plaintiff, Bryan Corporation (“Bryan Corp.”), agreed to *105purchase the pharmaceutical
Roche v. Morgan Collection, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Document Nos. 6 and 16) NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Joanna Roche (“Plaintiff’) alleges that her former employer, Morgan Collection, Inc. (“Morgan Collection”) and its officers, Andrew T. Morgan (“Morgan”) and Linda S. Kagan (“Kagan”) (together “Defendants”), failed to pay her compensa
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank Agpublic domain
764 F.Supp.2d 263 (2011) AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Akamai Securities Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. DEUTSCHE BANK AG, Defendant. Civil Action No. 10-10254-JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 15, 2011. *264 Elizabeth A. Edmondson, Michael W. Ross, Andrew Weissmann, Jenner & Block, LLP, New York, NY,
404 B.R. 593 (2009) In re ACCESS CARDIOSYSTEMS, INC., Debtor. Access Cardiosystems, Inc., North American Enterprises, Inc., John Moriarty and Associates, John J. Moriarty, Richard F. Connolly, Jr., and Joseph R. Zimmell, Plaintiffs, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Access Cardiosystems, Inc., *594 Plaintiffs-Intervenors,[1] v. Randall Fincke, Defendant. Bank
Wilder v. TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERICAS CORP.public domain
764 F.Supp.2d 249 (2011) Erica J. WILDER, for herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TOYOTA FINANCIAL SERVICES AMERICAS CORPORATION, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, Defendants. Civil Action No. 10-10365-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 9, 2011. *252 Walter H. Jacobs, J.D. Attorney a
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS 11-30035-MAP (Dkt. Nos. 22 and 28); 11-30039-MAP (Dkt. No. 17); 11-30044-MAP (Dkt. No. 17); 11-30047-MAP (Dkt. No. 16); 11-30048-MAP (Dkt. Nos. 23 and 27); 11-30094-MAP (Dkt. No. 24); 11-30126-MAP (Dkt. No. 26); 11-30127-MAP (Dkt. No. 10); 11-30141-MAP (Dkt. No. 11). PONSOR, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plai
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge. Amorim Holding Financeira S.G.P.S., S.A. (“Amorim Holding”) filed this suit against C.P. Baker & Co., Ltd. and its principal, Christopher P. Baker (collectively, “Baker”), alleging violations of the Massachusetts Securities Act, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, and unfair and deceptive trade practices in vi
610 F.Supp.2d 113 (2009) Paul BERGERON, Individually and on behalf of the P. Bergeron Nominee Trust v. RIDGEWOOD SECURITIES CORP., et al. Civil Action No. 06-10321 RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 31, 2009. *116 William C. Nystrom, Robert S. Messinger, Nystrom Beckman & Paris LLP, Boston, MA, for Pau