Cases

PD-0180-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS June 15, 2015 Transmitted 6/15/2015 12:00:00 AM Accepted 6/15/2015 7:52:34 AM

PD-0180-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/19/2015 2:26:42 PM Accepted 2/19/2015 2:32:33 PM

Order, Family Court, New York County (Jane Pearl, J.), entered on or about April 16, 2015, which, among other things, dismissed without prejudice petitioner father’s petitions seeking to modify a custody order and to enforce a visitation order, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Family Court properly declined to exercise its continuing jurisdiction under Domestic Relations Law § 76-a (1)

PD-0180-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/14/2015 2:24:41 PM Accepted 7/14/2015 2:30:54 PM July

COLEMAN, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Following Steve Broome’s death, his ex-wife Elizabeth Strickland and his children, Stephen Luke Broome and Jesse Alan Broome, filed claims against Steve’s estate for child support arrears, other un-" paid support obligations, and for life insurance proceeds. The chancellor dismissed all of the claims, holding that the c

EATON, J. ¶ 1. In this appeal, we are asked to recognize a common-law private right of action for damages resulting from the unjustified disclosure to a third party of information obtained by medical personnel during treatment. Plaintiff alleges in her lawsuit that she incurred damages as the result of an emergency room nurse informing a police officer that she was intoxicated, had d

HENDRY, Judge. Jeffrey Pearl appeals from an order dismissing his action against appellee, pursuant to Rule 1.260(a)(1), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure,1 for failure to file a notice of substitution of parties within 90 days after death was suggested upon the record. We reverse. Appellant admits that he received notice of the death of Elizabeth Kelly. He asserts, however, wi

40 B.R. 860 (1984) In the Matter of Charles R. PEARL, Debtor. and In re SHORE SITES, INC., Debtor. Charles J. BENNEMAN, Jr. and Bertha H. Benneman, Plaintiffs, v. Charles R. PEARL, Shore Sites, Inc., Pearl Builders, Inc., and Richard Kinnear, Receiver. Bankruptcy Nos. B-74-1480, B-74-1481, Adv. No. 83-0023-TS. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey. June 25,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 391 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 392 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER R. BROOKE JACKSON, United States District Judge' This case between the plaintiffs and the one non-settling defendant, Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company, was tried to the Court on June 23-25, 2014. The issues remaining for trial after this Court’s previous orders on various motions were whether Mountain States unreasonably delayed or denied payment o

This is an appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment, certified as final under NRCP 54(b), in an action to quiet title.1 Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, Judge. Reviewing the summary judgment de novo, Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 729,

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 24-OCT-2024 07:56 AM Dkt. 48 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 26-SEP-2024 02:30 PM Dkt. 32 ODAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

ERVIN, Circuit Judge: Harry Wallace and his wife, Elizabeth, brought this action in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland under the Swine Flu Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 247b, to recover for personal injuries and damages as a result of a swine flu inoculation administered to Harry Wallace. The district court dis

OPINION OF THE COURT NYGAARD, Circuit Judge. Before us is Appellee Buckley Broadcasting’s motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The Appellants have filed a memorandum in opposition. Buckley Broadcasting argues that we lack jurisdiction because the Appellants did not file their notice of appeal within thirty (30) days of the date the District Court’s judgment became final, as required by

110 S.E.2d 503 (1959) Elizabeth Pearl CHRISTOPHER v. Everett Grant CHRISTOPHER. No. 11058. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 15, 1959. Decided October 20, 1959. *504 A. Blake Billingslea, Fairmont, Charles H. Brown, Kingwood, for appellant. James T. Dailey, Jr., Kingwood, Clark

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This consolidated appeal arises out of the probate of the will of Waldo DeLoache (“Waldo”). Mary Sue Graetz, Hazel Polk, Marion Copeland, Joseph Marcus Hughes, III, Libbie Hughes Kurinee, James Dub-berly, John S. Hubbard, William B. Hubbard, Marsha Perkins Lapadula, Robert Mitchell Perkins 1 , Sarah Cook,

KAHN, J. In this wind insurance claim case, a jury awarded policy limits to the Hamiltons, whose mobile home was destroyed by Hurricane Ivan. Appellant Citizens Property Insurance Corp. (Citizens) raises numerous points; we focus upon the following: (1) the exclusion of evidence that flooding caused the total loss of the insured properties, including evidence that the Hamiltons also had a flood insurance policy from which they

GREENE, Judge. Save Our Rivers, Inc. (SORI), Johnny R. Walker, Mary E. Walker, Helen C. Bayley, George G. Laneri, Elizabeth C. Laneri, Pat Thompson, Doug Thompson, Morris Bryson, Janice McClure, Alene Munger, Kim Thompson, Eunice Queen, John Northern, Joyce Northern, Nellie Carpenter, Christine Webb, Butch Deal, W.M. Moses, James Stephen Raby, Pearl Moses, Beta Tilson, Hallie Stiles, Jack McEachin, Claire McEachin, Joseph J. J

MEMORANDUM & ORDER VERNON S. BRODERICK, District Judge: Before the Court is the unopposed Joint Motion of Plaintiffs Esther Kelen, Elizabeth Taub, and Yocheved Milo to Consolidate Cases and for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. (12-CV-5024, Doc. 37; 12-CV-9113, Doe. 30; and 12-CV-9418, Doe. 25.) Plaintiffs seek an order (1) consolidating the eases captioned above, (2) certify