Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Peer Street, Inc.”
JAMES F. McKAY III, CHIEF JUDGE hThe facts giving rise to this case arise out of the New Orleans Building Corporation’s (NOBC) decision to award the lease to redevelop the World Trade Center site located at 2 Canal Street in New Orleans, Louisiana to Carpenter & Company, Inc. and Woodward Interests, LLC (they plan to turn the building into a Four Seasons Hotel). Two Canal Street Investors, Inc. (TCSI) was anothe
Matiella v. Murdock Street LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLES MATIELLA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-2112 (GMH) MURDOCK STREET LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this case, Plaintiff Charles Matiella alleges that the construction of a multi-unit
Peer News LLC v. City and County of Honolulu.public domain
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-14-0000889 09-JUN-2016 08:35 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
Street v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.public domain
ORDER SUSAN C. BUCKLEW, United States District Judge This cause comes before the Court on Defendants’, Aetna Life Insurance Company (“Aetna”) and Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”), Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 37), to which Plaintiff, Patricia Street, has filed a response in opposition (Dkt. 46).1 For the reasons stated
Veer v. J&M Main Street Associates, Inc.public domain
Hillman, J. The plaintiffs son was a pedestrian who was run over and killed by a drunken driver who fled the scene of the accident. At the time of his death Gary Vander Veer was a 19 year old sophomore at Holy Cross College in Worcester. His estate has brought this action seeking recovery for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death against the liquor establishment and its owners who allegedly served the drunken driver. Be
Aspen Skiing Co. v. Peerpublic domain
804 P.2d 166 (1991) ASPEN SKIING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Leslie PEER, Respondent. No. 89SC548. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. January 14, 1991. Rehearing Denied February 4, 1991. *167 Arnold & Porter, James E. Scarboro, Tim Atkeson, Barry K. Arrington, Alfred T. McDonnell, Denver, for petitioner.
Cornell v. 360 West 51st Street Realty, LLCpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Read, J. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that plaintiff Brenda Cornell (Cornell) did not raise a triable issue of fact to rebut the prima facie showing made by defendant 360 West 51st Street Corp. (51st Street Corporation or the corporation) that her claimed personal injuries were not caused by indoor exposure to dampness and mold. Accordingly, Supreme Court properly granted the
Kenney v. STATE STREET CORPORATIONpublic domain
694 F.Supp.2d 67 (2010) Thomas U. KENNEY, on Behalf of Himself and a Class of Persons Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. STATE STREET CORPORATION; North America Regional Benefits Committee of State Street Corporation; Alison Quirk; Pamela Gormley; Ross McLellan; David O'leary; Skip Curtrell; Jayne Donahue; David Gutschenritter; James Malerba State Street Corporation Investment Committee; and John Does 1-10, Defendants. Civil
Cornell v. 360 West 51st Street Realty, LLCpublic domain
*52OPINION OF THE COURT Manzanet-Daniels, J. The motion court incorrectly interpreted our ruling in Fraser v 301-52 Townhouse Corp. (57 AD3d 416 [2008], appeal dismissed 12 NY3d 847 [2009]), as setting forth a categorical rule requiring dismissal of plaintiffs toxic mold claim due to failure meet the standard of scientific reliability se
Byrd v. Janssen Pharm., Inc.public domain
GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief United States District Judge Currently before the Court, in this products liability action filed by Shaquil Byrd ("Plaintiff") against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Janssen"), and Johnson & Johnson ("Defendants"), is Defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 or, in the alternative, for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. (Dkt. No. 199.) For the reasons set
Sherman v. Bear Stearns Companies Inc.public domain
OPINION Sweet, D.J. Defendants The Bear Stearns- Companies Inc. (“Bear Stearns”), James E. *448Cayne, and Warren J. Spector (together, “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16, 26, and 37, to strike the revised expert report (the “Revised Report”) of Dr. John D. Finnerty (“Finnerty”) served by Plaintiff Bruce S. Sherman
H&R Block, Inc. v. Block, Inc.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2075 ___________________________ H&R Block, Inc.; HRB Innovations, Inc. Plaintiffs - Appellees v. Block, Inc.
Frenchtown Square Partnership v. Nick Ents., Inc.public domain
[Cite as Frenchtown Square Partnership v. Nick Ents., Inc., 2021-Ohio-663.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO FRENCHTOWN SQUARE : OPINION PARTNERSHIP, : Plaintiff-Appellee, CASE NO. 2020-T-0038
In re TransPerfect Global, Inc.public domain
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KATHALEEN ST. JUDE LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER MCCORMICK 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 CHANCELLOR
CFPB v. Townstone Financial, Inc.public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1654 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWNSTONE FINANCIAL, INC. and BARRY STURNER, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for
Chong v. STL International, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge Plaintiff purchased ,an inversion table manufactured by Defendant STL International, Inc. (“STL”) and gold by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) (collectively, “Defendants”). A few months later, Plaintiff was, injured when she fell from the inversion table while it was fully inverted. Plaintiff filed suit,-alleging claims for strict prod
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2020 VT 38
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge United States District Court Plaintiff Sonin Group USA, Inc. (“So-rin”) brings this action against Defendant St. Jude Medical, S.C., Inc. (“St. Jude”) based on St. Jude’s hiring of two former Sorin employees — a supervisor, Danna Ho-man, and a salesperson,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DOUMAR, District Judge. Plaintiff filed a motion for judgment in the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia alleging that Defendants, an insurer and its agents, breached an insurance agreement and committed intentional misconduct and acted in bad faith to deprive it of a business expectancy separate and apart from the insurance agreement. Defendants, two
Estate of Truesdell v. Traci Brown Ins. Agency Inc.public domain
[Cite as Estate of Truesdell v. Traci Brown Ins. Agency Inc., 2024-Ohio-5440.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY ESTATE OF CASE NO. 2024-A-0029 JERRIAN C. TRUESDELL, DECEASED, Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas