⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Peggy Gray Hiatt”

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 10× · 808 S.E.2d 488; 256 N.C. App. 401
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA17-74 Filed: 21 November 2017 Forsyth County, Nos. 10-CVS-6926; 11-CVS-2998, 7119, 7120, 8170-8174, 8338; 12- CVS-4851, 4853-4859, 4861-4870, 4873-4876, 4916, 5953-5961, 5963, 6321, 6322, 6652, 7721, 8189; 13-CVS-1645, 4506, 6794, 7129; 14-CVS-4803-4806, 4808, 4809, 5702, 5703, 6311; 15-CVS-0301, 0610, 2471-2532, 3208-3231, 4011-4016, 4655-4657, 5447, 5448, 6744, 7770-777
Scott v. Moserpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976-11-03 · Published · cited 1× · 229 S.E.2d 222; 31 N.C. App. 268; 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 1967
229 S.E.2d 222 (1976) 31 N.C. App. 268 Sallie M. SCOTT (widow) et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ruby Juanita Scott MOSER et al., Defendants. No. 7617DC304. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 3, 1976. *225 Folger & Folger by Fred Folger, Jr., and Larry Bowman, Mount Airy, for plaintiffs-appellees. <
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-12-10 · Published · cited 741× · 157 L. Ed. 2d 491; 124 S. Ct. 619; 540 U.S. 93; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 9195
540 U.S. 93 (2003) McCONNELL, UNITED STATES SENATOR, ET AL. v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ET AL. No. 02-1674. Supreme Court of United States. Argued September 8, 2003. Decided December 10, 2003[*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA *94
United States Tax Court · 1986-11-17 · Published · cited 192× · 87 T.C. 1087; 1986 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 166; 87 T.C. No. 68
NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th