Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Peiffer v. Merck & Co., Inc.”

Michaels Ex Rel. Estate of Michaels v. Mr. Heater, Inc.public domain

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006-01-30 · Published · cited 16× · 411 F. Supp. 2d 992; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3670; 2006 WL 231488

411 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Elizabeth MICHAELS, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Travis J. Michaels, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. MR. HEATER, INC., Admiral Indemnity Co., and Westchester Fire Insurance Company, Defendants. No. 05-C-0369-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. January 30, 2006. *993

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

Bergman v. United Services Automobile Ass'npublic domain

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999-12-06 · Published · cited 34× · 742 A.2d 1101; 1999 Pa. Super. 300; 1999 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4107

KELLY, J.: ¶ 1 In this appeal we must determine whether expert testimony should be required in cases involving allegations of bad faith in the context of insurance practices. Essentially, Appellant, Herbert Bergman, requests that this Court adopt a per se rule requiring expert testimony in all bad faith actions by an insured against an insurer. For the following reasons, we hold that the admission or exclusion of

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →