⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Pen American Center, Inc. v. Kevin Adams”

District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-05-06 · Published · cited 24× · 185 F. Supp. 3d 401; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 896; 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1852; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60539; 2016 WL 2621131
OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, United States District Judge Before the Court - is the .motion of defendant Center for Investigative Reporting, Inc. (“CIR”), for judgment on the pleadings, as well as CIR’s Rule 11 motion for sanctions against plaintiff Erica Almeciga and her counsel. Subsumed within defendant’s Rule 11 motion is a Daubert motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiffs
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 24–0261 Submitted February 18, 2025—Filed June 27, 2025 Amended September 4, 2025 State of Iowa, Appellee, vs. Kevin Dwayne Woods, Jr., Appellant. Appeal from th
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00726-CV 4089429 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002-05-31 · Published · cited 12× · 201 F. Supp. 2d 401; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9537; 2002 WL 1126046
201 F.Supp.2d 401 (2002) AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., v. UNITED STATES, et al. Multnomah County Public Library, et al., v. United States of America, et al. Nos. CIV.A. 01-1303, CIV.A. 01-1322. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 31, 2002. *402 *403 <
Trump v. CASA, Inc.public domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 606 U.S. 831
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 831–941 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
District Court, N.D. California · 2014-08-13 · Published · cited 4× · 65 F. Supp. 3d 742; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112325; 2014 WL 3974778
Dkt. Nos. 203, 204 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this action, Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Pesticide Action Network North America (“Plaintiffs”) allege the Environmental Protection Agency and Gina McCarthy, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Age
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00478-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/18
California Court of Appeal · 1999-01-04 · Published · cited 104× · 80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 196; 68 Cal. App. 4th 243
80 Cal.Rptr.2d 196 (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 243 Johnette Marie ADAMS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF FREMONT et al., Defendants and Appellants. Johnette Marie Adams et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. City of Freemont et al., Defendants and Respondents. Nos. A074965, A075279. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two. Decemb
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-05-10 · Published · cited 16× · 190 F. Supp. 3d 100; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64909; 2016 WL 2899222
MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge I. Introduction Drawing an analogy to the fate of penguins whose destinies appear doomed in the face of uncertain environmental changes; Defendant. Staples Inc. (“Staples”) and Defendant Office Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”) (collectively “Defendants”) argue they are l
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 189× · 600 U.S. 181
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014-06-12 · Published · cited 6× · 512 B.R. 19; 2014 WL 2624987; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 2577
MEMORANDUM JOAN N. FEENEY, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Mark G. DeGiacomo, the Chapter 7 Trustee (the “Trustee”) of Inofin Incorpo*25rated (“Inofín”) filed a Complaint against Raymond C. Green, Inc. (“RCG”) on April 25, 2011, one day before this Court conducted a hearing on RCG’s Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay and for
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013-07-31 · Published · cited 5× · 960 F. Supp. 2d 1200; 2013 WL 4400382; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116039
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant PHC-Las Cruces, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Claim Under the Rehabilitation Act and Memorandum in Support, filed September 20, 2012 (Doc. 41)(“Motion for Summary Judgment”). The Court held a hearing on November 28, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) wheth
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-05-11 · Published · cited 21× · 104 F. Supp. 3d 441; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61516; 2015 WL 2183875
OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge: Table of Contents PROCEDURAL HISTORY.453 BACKGROUND.458 *450[[Image here]] *451[[Image here]]
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2014-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00991-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-01-04 · Published · cited 492× · 396 F.3d 96
WESLEY, Circuit Judge. Appellants challenge the district court’s approval of a class action settlement, including the award of attorneys’ fees. The class action involved approximately five million merchants and alleged, inter alia, that defendants Visa U.S.A. Inc. and MasterCard International Inc. tied merchant use of defendants’ debit products to use of defendants’ credit cards, in violation of the
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-12-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3590 (JEB) META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Believing that the only constant in the world was change, the Greek philosopher Heraclitus posited that no man can ever step into the same river
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-11-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3590 (JEB) META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Believing that the only constant in the world was change, the Greek philosopher Heraclitus posited that no man can ever step into the same river
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007-07-03 · Published · cited 9× · 494 F. Supp. 2d 54; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47886; 2007 WL 1893058
494 F.Supp.2d 54 (2007) AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD., a Swiss Company, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, a German Company and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., a New Jersey Corporation Defendants. No. CIV.A. 05-12237-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 3, 2007. *55 *56