Cases

APPEALS COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. ANGEL PENA-LARA Docket: 22-P-592 Dates: March 11, 2024 – September 10, 2024 Present: Rubi

785 F.Supp.2d 165 (2011) Roger HARTLEY, Plaintiff, v. Henry RUBIO, City of New York, New York City Department of Education, and Does 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. No. 08 CV 4461 (NRB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 29, 2011. *170 Joy Hochstadt, Joy Hochstadt P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Isaac Klep

938 So.2d 1153 (2006) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee v. Robert HARTLEY, Appellant. No. 41,178-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 23, 2006. Louisiana Appellate Project, by Carey J. Ellis, III, Louis G. Scott, for Appellant. *1154 Jerry L. Jones, District Attorney, Charles L. Brumfield, Edward D. Young, A

573 F.3d 1011 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alvin HUTCHINSON, a/k/a Big Al, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Arthur Thompson, a/k/a "LT", Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Junior Ray Montoya, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William L. Gladney, a/k/a "L", Defendant-Appellan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLEY STEARNS, et al., Plaintiffs, Vv. Case No. 1:17-cv-131-RCL THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN Defendant. FINDING OF LIABILITY For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion, the Court hereby GRANTS the plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment. Specifically, the Court holds as follows: 1. As to Count I, defendant the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) is LIABLE to the following plaintiffs: (1) Steven Vernier, Jr.; (2

OPINION The conviction is for the possession of a forged instrument with intent to defraud as denounced by Article 998, Vernon's Ann.P.C. The trial was on a plea of not guilty before the court; the punishment was assessed at two years. Appellant contends that the court erred in overruling his motion to quash the indictment, because it contained no allegation that appellant forged the instrument that he was alleged to have possessed. Article 998, supra, p

OPINION This is an appeal from an order revoking probation granted in a conviction on March *Page 930 12, 1968 for burglary with punishment assessed at 3 years in the penitentiary. The state's motion to revoke probation alleged violation of the condition of the appellant's probation that the appellant commit no offense against the laws of this state or any other state or of the United States in that on or about February 16,

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

PER CURIAM: This case was orally argued in New Orleans on October 18, 1979. There was a jury verdict against W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, in the sum of $10,500 for failure to release Johnson from the Texas prison system on the date his sentence lawfully expired.

445 U.S. 263 (1980) RUMMEL v. ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 78-6386. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 7, 1980. Decided March 18, 1980. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *264 Scott J. Atlas, by appointment of the Court, 442 U. S. 939, argued the cause

OPINION The conviction is for burglary; the punishment was assessed at two years. The appellant did not comply with Sec. 9 of Art. 40.09, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 728. The groun

Appellee Dr. Hector R. Rojas, plaintiff below, secured judgment after jury verdict against appellant, Pan American College, defendant in the trial court, for damages for breach of employment contract. Motion for new trial was overruled, and defendant has perfected this appeal. Appellee, a Doctor of Astonomy whose residence is in France, was employed by appellant in September, 1962, by contract to expire May 31, 1963, as Research Associate under Professor Paul Engle in a program

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 57 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CR-22-717 BRYAN PORRAS Opinion Delivered January 31, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FORT V

PER CURIAM: Paul William Jordan was convicted in Texas state court of aggravated robbery and was sentenced to eighty-five years imprisonment. After exhausting state remedies, 1 he petitioned the district court for habeas corpus relief. This request was denied without an evi

OPINION The offense is felony embezzlement; the punishment, two years. The indictment alleged the embezzlement of $85.19 in money from Valley Transit Co. Inc., a corporation, by appellant, its agent and bailee. The first ground of error is that the court erred in allowing admission of evidence and allusion to the commission by defendant of other crimes and transactions. Art. 40.09, Sec. 9, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., requires that the defendant's brief s

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

PER CURIAM: Habeas petition by a Texas state prisoner. The respondent was not served with a summons or a show cause order and was unaware of the case until served with appellant’s brief on appeal. The Magistrate, relying on state court records and an ex parte personal investigation of non-record matters, recom

2022 IL 125959 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 125959) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. OMEGA MOON, Appellant. Opinion filed April 7, 2022.

356 F.Supp.2d 166 (2005) Naud CHARRON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF HARTFORD, Michael Parker, Leonard Wallace, and Charles Teale, Defendants. No. 3:02CV1526DJS. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 16, 2005. *168 Norman A. Pattis, Williams & Pattis, New Haven, CT, for Plaintiff. Jill Hartley, John P. Shea, J

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2023 ME 15 Docket: Wal-22-19 Argued: September 8, 2022 Decided: February 16, 2023 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, JJ., and HUMPHREY, A.R.J. JEFFREY R. MABEE et al. v. NORDIC AQUAFARMS INC. et al. CONNORS, J. [¶1] This is an appeal from a ju