⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Mitchell”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 354 F.3d 945
RILEY, Circuit Judge, concurring. Although I agree with the court’s decision, I concur to express two concerns: first, our imposition of federal equitable subrogation principles which may not comport with how Arkansas courts would necessarily decide this case; and second, our reversal of a respected Arkansas federal judge, who is more familiar with Arkansas legal practices than we are. Nevertheless, I am con
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-02-24 · Published · cited 15× · 354 F.3d 945
354 F.3d 945 PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant,Cannon Contracting, Inc., Intervenor Plaintiff,v.CITY OF PINE BLUFF, Defendant/Appellee,David Mitchell Construction, Inc.; David R. Mitchell; Theresa Mitchell; Karl F. Dix, Jr.; Pine Bluff National Bank; Nobel Insurance Company, Defendants.Surety Association of America, Amicus on Behalf of Appellant.Pennsylva
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 164 So. 3d 537; 2014 Ala. LEXIS 150; 2014 WL 4798773
MURDOCK, Justice (concurring specially). “ ‘The general rule is that when an insurer pays the insured in accordance with the insurance contract for a loss of property proximately resulting from fire caused by the actionable misconduct of a third party, the insurer becomes, by the doctrine of equitable subrogation, the owner, pro tanto, of the claim of the insured against the third party.’ ”
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986-05-12 · Published · cited 0× · 288 S.C. 548; 343 S.E.2d 659; 1986 S.C. App. LEXIS 353
Shaw, Judge: *549This is an action for reformation of an insurance policy. Appellants Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (Pennsylvania) and R. V. Chandler and Sons, Inc. (Chandler) appeal from the trial court’s order reforming an insurance policy, in favor of respondent Golden Strip Motors, Inc. (Golden Strip), to include coverage of used as well a
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2013-10-23 · Published · cited 0× · 979 F. Supp. 2d 883; 2013 WL 5755684; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152278
ORDER SUSAN 0. HICKEY, District Judge. On September 6, 2012, 2012 WL 3886189, this Court granted Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (ECF No. 104) and remanded this case to the Miller County Circuit Court for further proceedings. The Court’s remand decision was based upon Plaintiffs’ stipulation which limited the class recovery to a sum less than the amount-in-controversy required by the Class Action Fai
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2007-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 245 F.R.D. 245; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61081
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER STARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Motion for Summary Judgment [# 102] filed on behalf of the individual defendants Terry Blalock and Charles Rice pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and on the alternative Motion to Continue the motion for summary judgment [# 123] filed on behalf of the plaintiffs. The court, having
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-12-14 · Published · cited 1× · 877 F.3d 1081
OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge: ■ Under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), a defendant in a civil suit may remove a “mass action” from state to federal court if the aggregate amount in controversy exceeds $5,000,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(2), (11). A “mass action” is defined as “any civil action ... in wh
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015-02-27 · Published · cited 0× · 90 F. Supp. 3d 526; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25362; 2015 WL 859586
ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on motions for summary judgment by defendant First Mercury Insurance Company (“First Mercury”) (DE 110); plaintiff Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company. _ (“Harleys-ville”) (DE 111); defendant Assurance Company of America (“Assurance”) (DE 117); and defendant First Financial Insurance Company (“First Financial”) (DE 126). Also befo
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-05-28 · Published · cited 3× · 138 F.4th 786
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1302 Doc: 81 Filed: 05/28/2025 Pg: 1 of 21 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1302 TOWERS WATSON & CO., now known as WTW Delaware Holdings, LLC, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBU
Superior Court of Delaware · 2023-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC., ) NAI ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, ) LLC, and SHARI E. REDSTONE, ) ) C.A. No. N22C-06-018 AML CCLD Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ENDURANCE AMERICAN SPECIALTY ) INSURANCE COMPANY, IRONSHORE ) INDEMNITY, INC., STARR INDEMNITY ) & LIABILITY COMPANY, AND ) NAT
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2023-01-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STILLWATER MINING COMPANY, § § Plaintiff Below, § No. 24, 2022 Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § NATIONAL UNION FIRE § C.A. No. N20C-04-190 INSURANCE COMPANY OF § PITTSBURGH, PA, § ACE AMER
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2017-11-08 · Published · cited 3× · 2017 SD 72; 904 N.W.2d 52; 2017 S.D. LEXIS 152
KERN, Justice [¶1.] Western National Mutual Insurance Co. (Western National) insured BHI Inc. under a commercial general liability (CGL) policy. In 2005, Regency Plymouth Ventures Ltd. (Regency) hired BHI to serve as a general contractor to build- four condominiums near Alexandria, Minnesota. TSP .Inc. was the project architect. BHI hired LandTeam
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994-04-15 · Published · cited 0× · 639 So. 2d 41; 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3497
COBB, Judge. This appeal involves a dispute between two insurance carriers as to the extent of their respective coverages of their insureds, herein referred to collectively as Crane,1 pursuant to policies relating to the errors and omissions of the latter acting as an insurance broker. Utica Mutual Insurance Company (Utica) issued the primary policy which covered $500,000.00 per claim and was limit
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-05-09 · Published · cited 12× · 67 F.4th 648
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2396 Doc: 62 Filed: 05/09/2023 Pg: 1 of 18 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2396 TOWERS WATSON & CO., now known as WTW Delaware Holdings, LLC, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
District Court, District of Columbia · 2010-10-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INGER F. SHEINBAUM, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF Civil Action No. 09–273 (CKK) READING, PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, and CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 1, 2010) Pl
Superior Court of Delaware · 2023-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-14-00123-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/16/2015 4:39:11 PM
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-04-11 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-1217 and 24-1223 GRIFFITH FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals fr
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-04-11 · Published · cited 3× · 134 F.4th 483
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-1217 and 24-1223 GRIFFITH FOODS INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeals fr
Superior Court of Delaware · 2023-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL