Cases

ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV

Filed 11/3/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA LORETO A. LAGRISOLA et al., D080758 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2021- NORTH AMERICAN FINANCIAL 00020798-CU-CO-CTL) CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

651 F.Supp.2d 219 (2009) SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. Action No. 05-2575 (KSH). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 28, 2009. *221 William J. O'Shaughnessy, Richard Hernandez, McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ, Charles W. Hall, William S. Lee, Nancy T.

ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc.’s (“Defendant” of “Teva”) Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. [66], seeking summary judgment in its favor on each of Plaintiff Keisha Hall’s (“Plaintiff’) claims. See Compl., ECF No. [1]. The Court has carefully reviewed the Motion, all supporting and op

PRESIDING JUSTICE ZENOFF delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Reliable Fire Equipment Co., appeals from an order of the circuit court of Du Page County entered on November 28, 2007, ruling that employment agreements entered into by the parties were unenforceable. Plaintiff also appeals from an order entered on June 12, 2008, directing a jury verdict in favor of defe

638 F.Supp.2d 1042 (2009) NCMIC FINANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. William ARTINO; Daniel Kerr; Sally Schmaltz; Pro Funding Group, LLC; and Unnamed Co-Conspirators, Defendants. No. 4:07-cv-00204-JEG. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 28, 2009. *1048 Frank B. Harty, Benjamin Patrick Roach, Nyemaster G

DENNIS, Circuit Judge. In this case, we review decisions by the bankruptcy and district courts resolving the competing claims of two secured creditors, Peoples State Bank (“Peoples State”) and General Electric Capital Corporation (“General Electric”), to proceeds resulting from an auction of non-titled movables1 formerly owned by a bankrupt corporation, Ark-La-Tex, and its two related juridical per

AMENDED1 MEMORANDUM OPINION IN SUPPORT OF JUDGMENT: (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS FOR (A) SUBORDINATION UNDER SECTION 510 AND (B) RE-CHARACTERIZATION; BUT (2) TREATING CERTAIN PLAIN-TIFFSISELLER NOTEHOLDERS AS PARI PASSU WITH THE DEFENDANTS/NEW NOTEHOLDERS STACEY G. JERNIGAN, Bankruptcy Judge. “Equity is a roguish thing. For law we have a measure, know what to t

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David Golden brings this suit against Management & Training Corporation ("MTC") and Chugach Government Services, Inc. ("CGSI") for discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ("ADEA"),

597 F.Supp.2d 651 (2009) John HALL et al., Plaintiffs, v. MARTIN ENGINEERING COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:07-0107. United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. February 10, 2009. *653 Heather M. Langeland, Joshua I. Barrett, Robert M. Bastress, III, Rudolph L. Ditrapano, Ditrapano Barrett &

34 So.3d 959 (2010) James Patrick CLUSE d/b/a J.P. Cluse Construction v. H & E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. No. 09-574. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. March 31, 2010. *961 Stan Gauthier, II Law Corporation, Nicole Laborde Romero, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant, James Patrick Cluse. Taylor, Porter, Bro

326 F.Supp.2d 1010 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ALISAL WATER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants No. C97-20099 JF(EAI). United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. April 9, 2002. Lori Jonas, Matthew Fogelson, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment *1011 and Natural Resources Division, U

OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Editor Note: The paragraphs related to headnotes 1-105 are found on the supplemental pieces of this opinion on Westlaw. Part 1 is 2014 WL 815553; Part 2 is 2014 WL 815613; Part 3 is 2014 WL 815715; Part 4 is 2014 WL 815869 [Head-notes 1-2]; Part 5 is 2014 WL 815923 [Headnotes 3-51]; Part 6 is 2014 WL 815961 [Headnotes 52-87]; Part 7 is 2014 WL 816086 [Headnotes 88-

People v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 04756) People v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 04756 Decided on August 21, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department MOULTON, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

ORDER WILLIAM J. ZLOCH, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Defendant Cox & Company, Ltd.’s, Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (DE 68). The Court held an evidentiary Hearing on the instant Motion (DE 68) on December 3, 2012. The Court has carefully reviewed said Motion, the entire court file and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT C. MICHAEL HILL, United States ' Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court are the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [rec. doc. 224] and Motion for Summary Judgment [rec. doc. 227] filed by Condor Petroleum Corporation (“Condor”). The plaintiff Partnerships and Partner/Investors (collectively “the Partnerships”), the Estate of Ashvin Zaveri (“the Estate”), Red Fox Run Corpo

137 F.Supp.2d 452 (2001) CROMER FINANCE LTD. and Prival N.V., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael BERGER, Fund Administration Services (Bermuda) Ltd., Ernst & Young International, Ernst & Young Bermuda, Kempe & Whittle Associates Limited, Deloitte & Touche (Bermuda), Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Deloitte & Touche L.L.P., Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., Bear Stearns Securities Corp., Financial Asset Management, Inc., and John Does 1-100,

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A pipeline operator challenges a local ordinance prohibiting loading crude oil onto tankers and the construction of new structures for that purpose on the grounds that it violates the dormant Commerce Clause and Foreign Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. A state or local statute can violate the dormant Commerce Clause if it (1) has an impermissible extraterritorial

NORMAN K. MOON, SENIOR JUDGE This case is about soured financing for a municipal golf course in the City of Buena Vista, Virginia. Through agreements in 2005, the City procured funds to renovate and service debt on the golf course. For initial purposes, one can conceptualize these agreements as creating a mortgage. The City and its recreational authority ("Authority") received cash from a bank. In return, the City pledged, "subject

HARRELL, J. On 17 February 2006, Appellant, Exxon Mobil Corporation (“Exxon”), reported a leak of approximately 26,000 gallons of gasoline from the underground tanks at its fueling station located in Jacksonville, Maryland.1 The seemingly cursed Jacksonville community, the unfortunate site of multiple gasoline leaks over the years, see, e.g., Exxon Corp. v. Yarema, 69 Md.App. 124, 516 A.2