⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “People of The State of California v. REV Group Inc”

Oregon Supreme Court · 2025-07-24 · Published · cited 3× · 374 Or. 58
58 July 24, 2025 No. 31 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellant. (TC 5409) (SC S070593) En Banc On appeal from the Oregon Tax Court.* R
Oregon Supreme Court · 2025-07-24 · Published · cited 0× · 374 Or. 58
58 July 24, 2025 No. 31 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant-Appellant. (TC 5409) (SC S070593) En Banc On appeal from the Oregon Tax Court.* R
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-12-13 · Published · cited 255× · 911 F.3d 558
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 13 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF No. 18-15144 DELAWARE; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STATE OF MARYLAND;
California Supreme Court · 2024-07-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Appellants; PROTECT APP-BASED DRIVERS AND SERVICES et al., Interveners and Appellants. S279622 First Appellate District, Division Four A163655 Alameda County Superior
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2025-06-23 · Published · cited 24× · 2025 CO 42
1 2025 CO 42 The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert Keith Ray. Defendant-Appellant No. 10SA157Supreme Court of Colorado, En BancJune 23, 2025 ADVANCE SHEET HEADNOTE In this direct appeal, the defendant asserts that the district court erred b
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE GEO GROUP, INC., No. 24-2815 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cv-05626- BHS v. JAY INSLEE, Governor; ROBERT FERGUSON, OPINION Defendants - Appellants. A
Oregon Tax Court · 2021-08-06 · Published · cited 3× · 24 Or. Tax 562
562 August 6, 2021 No. 25 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION GLOBAL HOOKAH DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a North Carolina corporation, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. (TC 5272) On cross-motions for summary judgment, Plaintiff raised two issues reg
Oregon Tax Court · 2020-02-18 · Published · cited 1× · 24 Or. Tax 22
22 February 18, 2020 No. 2 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION T-MOBILE USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. (TC 5321) On cross-motions for summary judgment, the parties disagreed whether two of Plaintiff’s subsidiaries—one pro
California Court of Appeal · 2023-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/13/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. No. STATE OF CALIFORNIA RG21088725) et al., Defendants and Appellants, PROTECT APP-BASED DRI
California Court of Appeal · 2023-04-12 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 4/12/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR HECTOR CASTELLANOS et al., Plaintiffs and A163655 Respondents, v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG21088725) STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.,
Oregon Tax Court · 2019-11-26 · Published · cited 4× · 23 Or. Tax 512
512 November 26, 2019 No. 23 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Plaintiff, and WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. THE NEW FRIENDS OF THE BEAVERTON CITY LIBRARY, Defendant.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0× · 122 Fed. Cl. 315
Cal. Pub. Util. Code §§ 330-398.5; Certification, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(2); Contracts Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-13; Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7101,' et seq.; Department of Energy Power Marketing Rates Delegation Order Confirmation And Approval, 43 Fed. Reg. 60,636-37; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 791a et seq.;
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2015-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 07-157C & 07-167C Consolidated No. 07-184C Filed: March 13, 2015 ***************************** * PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, * and SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON * COMPANY, * * Plaintiffs,
California Court of Appeal · 2021-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 11/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- JOHN TOS et al., C089466 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2016-
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021-04-19 · Published · cited 1× · 486 P.3d 239
486 P.3d 239The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner<
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-24-00040-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Oregon Tax Court · 2019-03-21 · Published · cited 1× · 23 Or. Tax 263
No. 13 March 21, 2019 263 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION Senator Brian J. BOQUIST and Senator Herman Baertschiger, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant. (TC
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-24-00040-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-01-16 · Published · cited 6× · 127 F.4th 750
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UGOCHUKWU GOODLUCK Nos. 21-36024 NWAUZOR; FERNANDO 22-35026 AGUIRRE-URBINA, individually and on behalf of all those similarly D.C. No. situated, 3:17-cv-05769- RJB Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. OPINION THE GEO GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation
Oregon Tax Court · 2020-07-15 · Published · cited 2× · 24 Or. Tax 146
146 July 15, 2020 No. 9 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION POWEREX CORP., Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. (TC 5339) On cross-motions for partial summary judgment, Plaintiff argued that it was not a “public utility” and therefore O