Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Perla Gonzalez”
People v. Gonzalezpublic domain
*649 Opinion CORRIGAN, J. Defendant Perla Isabel Gonzalez (Perla) recruited her brother and her boyfriend to assault Roberto Canas-Fuentes (Canas). 1 After Canas fended off a knife attack and gained the upper hand in the fig
Becker v. Perlapublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered on or about March 12, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ counsel and sua sponte ordered that plaintiff Ronny Becker could not be represented by the same counsel as the other plaintiffs, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion to disqu
Perla Judith Pena v. Statepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00358-CR Perla Judith PENA, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
MCC Development Corp. v. Perlapublic domain
Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered May 12, 2009 and June 15, 2009, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and to discharge a mechanic’s lien and cancel a notice of pendency, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Pursuant to paragraph 4.4 of the contract, “[c]laims . . . shall be referred initially to the Architect for decision” and the “initial decision by the Architect shall be req
Rakosi v. Daniel Perla Associatespublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered on or about October 23, 2002, which granted defendants-respondents’ motions to dismiss the complaint as against them and denied plaintiffs cross motion to amend the complaint to add a necessary party, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant plaintiffs cross motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The action was properly dismissed as against defendants-respondents
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III EL PUEBLO DE Certiorari PUERTO RICO Procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Recurrido Sala de ARECIBO KLCE2023
Alfredo Montanez-Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.public domain
JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Alfredo Montanez-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying his application for cancellation of removal. The IJ denied Montanez-Gonzalez’s application on the grounds that he had established neither his continuous presence
176 S.W.3d 595 (2005) UMLIC VP LLC, Appellant, v. T & M SALES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC., Tomas Lozano, Perla Lozano, and Walter M. Ezell, Appellees. No. 13-02-00634-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. September 15, 2005. Rehearing Overruled November 10, 2005. *602 Beverly A. Whitley,
Romero v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM*** Lead petitioners Gregorio Montiel Romero and Pilar Gonzalez Calderon, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING DEFENDANTS’ COUNTERCLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE KEVIN MICHAEL MOORE, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 110). Defendants filed a Response in Opposition (ECF No. 137) and Plaintiffs filed a Reply (ECF No. 179). On March 12, 2014,
928 Country Back Tr. Vs. Bank Of America, N.A.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 928 COUNTRY BACK TRUST, A No. 79543 NEVADA TRUST, Appellant, FILED VS. APR 0 9 2021 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., A ELIZABETH A. BROWN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
928 Country Back Tr. Vs. Bank Of America, N.A.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 928 COUNTRY BACK TRUST, A No. 79543 NEVADA TRUST, Appellant, vs. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., A SEP 1 8 2020 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, EUZA.BE-771-! A. BROWN CLERK OF SIA-W.EME COURT Res s ondent. DEPS Y CLERK
In re Mutual Benefits Offshore Fund, Ltd.public domain
ORDER K. MICHAEL MOORE, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on appeal from a Final Judgment entered by the Honorable A. Jay Cristol, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Southern District of Florida, in the matter In re Mutual Benefits Offshore Fund, Ltd., Bankr.No. 11-17051-AJC, docket entry 654. Appellant filed an Initial Brief (ECF No. 15), Appellee filed an Answer (ECF
Ragno v. Nationwide Associates, Inc.public domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 14, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the motion of defendants-respondents for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants-respondents arose, at the latest, in 1990. Accordingly, the complaint as against those defendants, which was not interposed until 1999
in the Interest of I. R. , a Childpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER Appellate case name: In the Interest of B.R., A Child v. Department of Family Protective and Services; In the Interest of I.A.R., A Child v. Department of Family Protective and Services Appellate case number: 01-13-00023-CV; 01-13-00024-CV Trial court
In a proceeding pursuant to Insurance Law § 5218 (c) for leave to commence an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Giacomo, J.), entered December 4, 2012, as denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to renew his petition for leave to commence an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnifi
In a proceeding pursuant to Insurance Law § 5218 (c) for leave to commence an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Giacomo, J.), entered December 4, 2012, as denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to renew his petition for leave to commence an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnifi
United States v. Hernandezpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are: (a) Motion to Dismiss the Indictment for Government Misconduct Occurring Before the Grand Jury and Renewal Request for In Camera Inspection of Grand Jury Transcripts with Combined Memorandum of Law filed by the defendant Vanessa Martinez Hernández [106] (hereinafter “Vanessa Marti
In re Swingearnpublic domain
In a guardianship proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81, in which Richard L. Farley, guardian of the person and property of Pearl Swingearn, petitioned to settle the final account, the Nassau County Department of Social Services appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Maraño, J.), dated March 6, 2007, as (a) granted the guardian’s motion, in effect, for leave to renew and reargue his p
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-24-00352-CV ———————————— Juan Luis Mora, Individually and as Dependant Administrator of the Estate of Arturo Mora Reyes, Deceased, Perla Rodriguez, as Next of Friend of P.A.M., A.W.M., and P.V.M., all