⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Perry O. Hooper”

Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997-10-31 · Published · cited 8× · 707 So. 2d 209
The plaintiff, Mississippi Valley Title Insurance Company ("Mississippi Valley"), appeals from an order dismissing its complaint against Perry O. Hooper, Sr. The plaintiff also petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to allow a second amendment to the complaint. We affirm the dismissal and deny the petition. Background Mississippi Valley alleged in its original complaint that Hooper had acted as an attorney-at-law to render title op
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960-03-23 · Published · cited 5× · 274 F.2d 403
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment in a bankruptcy proceeding in which, adopting as his own the memorandum opinion, the findings of fact and the conclusions of law of the referee, denying appellant’s petition to foreclose his mortgage for the full amount of his claims, the district judge made the referee’s o
Ex Parte Hooperpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984-05-11 · Published · cited 21× · 453 So. 2d 1066
In view of the fact that the respondent, Perry O. Hooper, trial judge, filed a motion under Rule 39 (k), Ala.R.App.P., in which he stated that "the new trial was granted on grounds other than insufficiency of the evidence," I agree that the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in granting the state's petition for mandamus. The circumstances of this case are unlike those presented in Ex parte Nice, 407 So.2d 874 (Ala. 1981).
Hooper v. Siegelmanpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 386 So. 2d 207
This expedited appeal, submitted on briefs and arguments of counsel on July 1, 1980, presents the issue whether a judge, appointed to a judicial office vacated by a prior appointee, may offer for election for a full term before he has completed one year in office, and such an election be valid. Immediately upon submission and after careful consideration, we issued an order affirming the judgment below which decreed that the Appellee, Judge Hartwell B. Lutz, was lawfully elected for a
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960-09-26 · Published · cited 263× · 282 F.2d 195
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. In this civil action seeking relief for violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 78 et seq., 78j, and Rule X-10B-5 promulgated by the SEC, the principal question is whether a corporation misled by fraud in the issuance of its stock in return for spurious assets is a seller. Is
Dennis v. Northcuttpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005-08-19 · Published · cited 5× · 923 So. 2d 275; 2005 WL 1995327
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 277 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 278 On Application for Rehearing On July 8, 2005, this Court affirmed the trial court's summary ju
Dennis v. Northcuttpublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004-02-13 · Published · cited 6× · 887 So. 2d 219; 2004 WL 260965
In February 1998, Gregory Dennis retained attorney Walter Northcutt to represent him in a legal-malpractice action against the law firm Meelheim and Rea, P.C.1 Northcutt represented Dennis in his suit against Meelheim and Rea; however, on September 9, 1999, Northcutt moved to withdraw as counsel, stating that he and Dennis were no longer able to work together and that it would be in Dennis's best interest to be represented by another
Hooper v. Rockwellpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999-02-22 · Published · cited 75× · 513 S.E.2d 358; 334 S.C. 281; 1999 S.C. LEXIS 49
334 S.C. 281 (1999) 513 S.E.2d 358 Kim D. HOOPER and Beverly G. Hooper, Plaintiffs, v. Amy ROCKWELL, Tony Suttles, South Carolina Department of Social Services, Candice Lynn Suttles, Shannon Donna Suttles, and Anthony Robert Edward Suttles, of whom Candice Lynn Suttles, Shannon Donna Suttles, and Anthony Robert Edward Suttles are minors under the age of eighteen years, by their guardian ad litem, Edward Galloway, Defendant
Galbraith v. Hooperpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-10-23 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 22-30159 Document: 00516940626 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/23/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED October 23, 2023
Hooper v. Hueypublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974-08-29 · Published · cited 15× · 300 So. 2d 100; 293 Ala. 63; 1974 Ala. LEXIS 922
This is an original petition filed in this court for writ of mandamus to be directed to the Honorable Thomas E. Huey, Jr., as Judge of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County. This case presents certain procedural questions in connection with a contest of a will under Tit. 61, §§ 52, 63, Code 1940. On April 12, 1973, Sarah Natalie Howard Bruce (hereinafter referred to as Mrs. Bruce) offered for probate in the Probate Court of Jefferson County, an instrument executed on August 31,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 49 F.3d 734
49 F.3d 734 Larry Roe, Perry O. Hooper, Sr., James D. Martinv.State of Alabama, By and Through its Attorney General JamesEvans, James Bennett, Honorable Alabama Secretary of State,John W. Davis, a Representative of a Class of Persons whoHanve Sought to Have Their Ballots Counted in an Action inCircuit Court of 8 Coosa County, Alabama, Mobile CountyAppointing Board Lionel W. Noonan, Wilcox County AppointingBoard, Jerr
State v. Hooperpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-08-29 · Published · cited 9× · 2022 Ohio 2990
[Cite as State v. Hooper, 2022-Ohio-2990.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-21-35 v. CHEYENNE N. HOOPER, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Allen County Common Pleas Court Trial
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977-08-03 · Published · cited 0× · 349 So. 2d 611; 1977 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 640
The parties to this appeal are coterminous landowners. Irene P. Adams sued O.D. King in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County for draining across her land two ponds located on his property, causing her property to flood. She alleged that as a consequence of his action she lost an opportunity to sell the property. After trial a jury returned a verdict in favor of Mrs. Adams, awarding her no compensatory damages but $500.00 punitive damages and ordering Mr. King to reseal the two ponds
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983-12-22 · Published · cited 18× · 443 So. 2d 917
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying plaintiffs' motion for *Page 918 relief under Rule 60 (b), Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm. On April 23, 1981, plaintiffs filed their complaint seeking injunctive relief to prevent the defendant, Capital City Church of the Nazarene, from building church facilities on a certain lot located within Green Acres subdivision. Plaintiffs' complaint alleged the existence of cert
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992-11-06 · Published · cited 2× · 612 So. 2d 1237; 1992 WL 317576
612 So.2d 1237 (1992) ALABAMA SECURITIES COMMISSION v. AMERICAN BUSINESS CLUB; J.F. (Jim) Straw. 2910360. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. November 6, 1992. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1992. Certiorari Denied February 26, 1993. Robert L. Rash, Director, Alabama Securities Com'n, Montgomery, for appellant. Perry O. Hooper,
Perry v. Spencerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024-02-21 · Published · cited 13× · 94 F.4th 136
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 16-2444 JWAINUS PERRY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. LUIS S. SPENCER, Commissioner; THOMAS DICKHAUT, Former Superintendent; ANTHONY M. MENDONSA, Former Deputy of Classification; JAMES J. SABA, Superintendent; ABBE NELLIGAN, Deputy of Classification; PATRICK TOOLIN, Correctional Program Officer; KRISTIE LADOUCEUR
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984-02-01 · Published · cited 0× · 446 So. 2d 40; 1984 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1231
This is an action for condemnation of drug-related objects defined in § 20-2-75, Code of Alabama 1975, as amended by 1980 Ala. Acts 80-579. Condemnation proceedings were brought by the District Attorney of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit against some ten boxes of articles seized under search warrant from a place of business in the City of Montgomery. After hearing ore tenus, the trial judge entered an order directing forfeiture of the entire lo
Dickey v. McClammypublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984-04-06 · Published · cited 5× · 452 So. 2d 1315; 18 Educ. L. Rep. 1092
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for the defendant following an ore tenus hearing in the trial court below. We reverse and remand. Plaintiff had been employed at Trenholm State Technical College (Trenholm) until he was removed by action of the president of the college, Thad McClammy. Plaintiff initiated this action for a writ of mandamus and injunctive relief, with the view of reinstatement to his former position, claiming that because he was a tenured em
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983-01-12 · Published · cited 3× · 441 So. 2d 596; 1983 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1135
This is a corporate income tax case. In 1978 Chesebrough-Ponds, Inc., was a foreign corporation doing business in Alabama. It joined with its fifteen subsidiaries in filing a consolidated federal income tax return for that year, but filed a separate return with Alabama (Alabama does not allow for consolidated returns). Section40-18-35 (3), Code of Alabama 1975 allows as a deduction from state income tax an amount of the total federal income ta
Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983-11-04 · Published · cited 0× · 440 So. 2d 1046; 1983 Ala. LEXIS 4885
Plaintiffs, who are Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama (Blue Cross) policyholders, appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in this action to recover interest on claims paid by Blue Cross under medical insurance policies held by the plaintiffs. The issue, which was before the trial court and is now before us, is this: Is Blue Cross, which issues health insurance policies which are silent as to when claims for benefits are due to be paid, required to pay interest at the l