Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

ORDER In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of June 26, 2013 as well as the resulting judgment, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

The stay in the above matter is dissolved effective immediately.

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority’s analysis and decisions in parts III and VI of its opinion, *1097determining that (1) the Proponents have standing to bring this appeal; and (2) the Motion to Vacate the Judgment should be denied. Because I do not agree w

667 F.3d 1078 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, Media Coalition, Intervenor, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Departm

Opinion CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J. At the request of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, we agreed to decide a question of California law that is relevant to the underlying lawsuit in this matter now pending in that federal appellate court. (Perry v. Brown (9th Cir., No. 10-16696); see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.548.) As posed by the Ninth Circuit, the question to be decided is “[w

639 F.3d 1153 (2011) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State

*1154ORDER Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472

In this interlocutory appeal regarding state legislative redistricting, we consider whether the trial court committed reversible error by denying a plea to the jurisdiction based upon issues of ripeness. Applying principles recently enunciated by this Court and the Texas Supreme Court in Perry v. Del Rio, we will affirm.1 See Perry v. Del Rio, No. 01-0728, 44 Tex. Sup.Ct. J. 1147, 2001 Tex. LEXIS 81 (Sept. 12, 2001);

STEINBERG, Judge: The appellant, Vietnam-era veteran Anthony E. Perry, appeals a July 1, 1994, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision denying entitlement to service connection for a heart disorder. Record (R.) at 6. The appellant filed a motion to remand and a reply, and the Secretary filed a motion to remand and a response. For the reasons that follow, the Court will vacate the BVA decision and remand the matter t

YANOFF, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned, retired, on recall). This opinion is a supplement to that portion of Fuechtbaum v. Constantini, 59 N.J. 167, 280 A.2d 161 (1971), which authorized service upon the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 to -91). The Fuechtbaum case dealt with two classes of *574def

992 F.2d 328 Perryv.Brown* NO. 92-8488 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Apr 21, 1993 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. 2

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1683 DEWAYNE PERRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RICHARD BROWN, Warden, Wabash Valley Correctional Facil- ity, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-1683 DEWAYNE PERRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RICHARD BROWN, Warden, Wabash Valley Correctional Facil- ity, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

FORT, J. In this habeas corpus proceeding plaintiff challenges the sufficiency of the documents of procedures under which he is being held for transfer to the State of Washington after probation violation. In his two assignments of error he questions whether the waiver of extradition which he signed in Washington as a condition of his being allowed to live in California while on parole is applicable in Oregon, and also contests

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B.  STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, MEDIA COALITION, Intervenor, v.  EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY ; SANDRA B. No. 10-16696 STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO , D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 3:09-cv-02292- VRW CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO , Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN , JR., in his official capacity as Governor o

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY ; SANDRA B. No. 10-16696 STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO , D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 3:09-cv-02292- VRW CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO , Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN , JR., in his official capacity as Governor o