Cases

Tokar v Weissberg (2018 NY Slip Op 05516) Tokar v Weissberg 2018 NY Slip Op 05516 Decided on July 25, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DYLAN TOKAR, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 16-2410 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 9, 10 : U.

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION This case arises from two Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") requests to the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ"). Dylan Tokar, a reporter for the public

Mingo v Nobandegani (2019 NY Slip Op 05974) Mingo v Nobandegani 2019 NY Slip Op 05974 Decided on July 31, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

Navas v New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens (2020 NY Slip Op 01069) Navas v New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens 2020 NY Slip Op 01069 Decided on February 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New Yor

[Cite as McCarthy v. Sterling Chems., Inc., 2016-Ohio-1039.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO PATRICK B. MCCARTHY, an : APPEAL NO. C-150274 incompetent, by and through his duly TRIAL NO. A-0509144 appointed guardians, Michael B. : McCarthy and Nancy M. McCarthy, : O P I N I O N. MARK COLLIN

257 S.W.3d 667 (2008) Andrew J. HACK, Respondent, v. Trish VINCENT Missouri Director of Revenue, Drivers License Bureau, Appellant. No. WD 68408. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. July 22, 2008. *668 Abagail L. Pierpoint, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Jon M. Krebbs, Liberty, MO, for respondent. Before J

Williams, P.J. The parties’ cross appeals present the issues of whether the judge in the jury-waived trial of this action erred in denying the motion of the defendant, Robert J. Langone (“Langone”), to dismiss the action on the basis of a previous dismissal of a case between the parties, and of whether the judge erred in awarding the prevailing plaintiff, Rockland Trust Company (“Rockland”), attorney’s fees in the amount of $15,

*869 Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge Wesley Osborn appeals, following a bench trial, his convictions of unlawful possession of an explosive weapon, § 571.020, 1 and failure to appear, § 544.665, for which he was sentenced to consecutive terms o

301 S.W.3d 90 (2010) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Travis D. MACK, Defendant-Appellant. No. SD 29477. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. January 13, 2010. *92 Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, and Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney Ge

[Cite as Simecek v. Simecek, 2024-Ohio-2471.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DAWN A. SIMECEK C.A. No. 30800 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE BRIAN J. SIMECEK

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 12, 2022 Decided August 16, 2022 No. 21-7036 ESTATE OF JEREMY ISADORE LEVIN, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., APPELLEE Consolidated with 21-7041, 21-7044, 21-7052, 21-7053 Appeals from the United States District Court

Filed 4/17/23; Modified and Certified for Pub. 5/5/23 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN CHILDHELP, INC., B311945 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC711998) v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 12, 2022 Decided August 16, 2022 No. 21-7036 ESTATE OF JEREMY ISADORE LEVIN, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., APPELLEE Consolidated with 21-7041, 21-7044, 21-7052, 21-7053 Appeals from the United States District Court

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION On October 3, 2011, this Court issued an Opinion and Order (the “Opinion”) granting Northwestern National Insurance Company’s (“NNIC”) motion to disqualify Freeborn & Peters LLP (“Freeborn”) from further representing Insco, Ltd. (“Insco”) in a pending arbitration.1 Insco n

BARRETT, Circuit Judge: Vernon Victor Prather appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute pseu-doephedrine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 861(d)(2) and 846, distribution of pseu-doephedrine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(d)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1957(a). Prather asks this Court to discharge him, vacating his convic

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge. Currently before the Court is petitioner Urban Outfitters, Inc.’s Amended Petition To Enforce Subpoena. Urban Outfitters seeks to discover documents in the possession of DPIC Companies, Inc. (“DPIC”), an insurance company located in Illinois, that relate to DPIC’s insured, Mary Swanson and Swanson Design Studios, and work perfor

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc EVE SHERRER, ) Opinion issued October 13, 2020 ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SC97465 ) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FREEDOM WATCH, INC., Plaintiff, v. No. 18-cv-88 (EGS) ROBERT S. MUELLER III, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Freedom Watch, Inc., a non-profit organization, brings this action against Defendants Robert S. Mueller III (“Mr. Mueller”), United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”),

364 S.W.3d 518 (2012) Kenneth BAUMRUK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. SC 91564. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. April 17, 2012. Rehearing Denied May 29, 2012. *523 William J. Swift, Public Defender's Office, Columbia, for Baumruk. Daniel N. McPherson, Attorney General's Office, Jeffer