Cases

835 F.Supp. 352 (1993) D.W. TALBOT, et ux. v. SAIPEM A.G., et al. Civ. A. No. G-93-437. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. October 28, 1993. *353 Ernest H. Cannon, Ernest Cannon & Associates, Houston, TX, for plaintiffs. Timothy K. Borchers, Eugene J. Silva, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., Housto

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, the United States Government (the Government), appealed the district court’s dismissal of an indictment against the defendant Asa Richard Talbot (the defendant or Talbot), which had charged him with assault with intent to commit a felony on a military reservation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113. The record disc

McCOMB, J. -This is an automatic appeal (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b)) from a judgment, after trial before a jury, on verdicts finding defendant guilty of murder in the first degree and imposing the death penalty. *695Facts: On March 13, 1965, about 6 :30 a.m., the mutilated body of Michael Dean Bartholomew was discovered in a rocky beach area below St

192 F.Supp. 663 (1961) READING COMPANY, a corporation, as Owner of Carfloat No. 23, Libellant and Cross-Respondent, v. POPE & TALBOT, INC., a corporation, as Owner Pro Hac Vice of Steamship THE WALTHAM VICTORY, Respondent and Cross-Libellant, v. MERRITT-CHAPMAN & SCOTT CORPORATION, Impleaded Respondent and Cross-Respondent. No. 471 of 1957. United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvani

PER CURIAM: Daryl J. Talbot sought a writ of habeas corpus to obtain his release from the United States Navy for an alleged breach of his contract of enlistment. He alleged and testified that, as a former Marine and a skilled illustrator with a college degree in art education, he enlisted in the Navy as an Illustrative-Draftsman third class under the Direct Petty Officer Procure

BURGESS, J. These are actions of ejectment for two different tracts of land in Pettis county, which by agreement of the parties are to- be heard together. The petitions are in the usual form. The answers admit possession, but deny the remaining allegations of the petitions. They then plead the ten and thirty-year statutes of limitations. They also aver that a vendor’s lien was expressly reserved in the deed to Guilford O. Talbot,

Dole, J. This is a case for damages for injuries received by the vessel of the libelants by stranding while being towed by the tug Fearless, and, as originally brought, included the dredger Pacific as one of the defendants, claiming that she was liable in that she signalled the approaching tug to pass her on her starboard side, which was an unsafe passage for her tow, and, being taken, led to the stranding of the libelants’ ship.

Robert H. Dudley, Justice. The appellants, plaintiffs below, Dale King and her minor son Marcel King, filed suit for recovery of medical expenses paid by the mother, Dale King, on behalf of her son, Marcel, and for injuries suffered by Marcel when he wrecked a three-wheeled motor vehicle. They sued Marcel’s grandfather and grandmother, D.J. King and Emilene King, for failing to properly super

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Jan 11 2019, 10:23 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

TALBOT, EJ. A jury convicted defendant, Raymond Curtis Carp, of first-degree murder,1 armed robbery,2 larceny in a building,3 and larceny of property worth $1,000 or more but less than $20,000.4 The trial court sentenced Carp to mandatory life imprisonment without parole for the first-degree murder conviction, 15 to

RADER, Circuit Judge. The United States Court of International Trade upheld an antidumping determination of the United States Department of Com*1079merce (Commerce). See Torrington Co. v. United States, 881 F.Supp. 622, 629-33 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1995). Commerce had declined to apply 19 C.F.R. § 353.26(a) (1992) in calculating the “United States price” and to

OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Cassandra B. Nickerson appeals from the District Court’s affirmation of her conviction before a Magistrate Judge for three Class B misdemeanors: operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in violation of 36 C.F.R. § 1004.23(a)(1); operating a motor

GUIDRY, J. 11 This matter involves the interpretation and application of the Uniform Local Sales Tax Code (“ULSTC”), , La.Rev.Stat. 47:337.1.et seq. The trial court found ambiguity in the language of the ULSTC requiring the plaintiff nightclubs , to “keep and preserve suitable records” of all sales and expenditures. The- trial court then found the tax collecto

Ellen L. Hollander, United States District Judge This employment discrimination case is brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), codified, as amended, at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Plaintiff Frederick J. Brennan has sued his former employer, Deluxe Corporation ("Deluxe"), alleging that he was disciplined and then terminated from his job because of discrimination based on religion. ECF 1-4 (the "

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18‐1605 REX A. FREDERICKSON, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. TIZOC LANDEROS, DETECTIVE, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18‐1605 REX A. FREDERICKSON, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. TIZOC LANDEROS, DETECTIVE, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18‐1605 REX A. FREDERICKSON, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. TIZOC LANDEROS, DETECTIVE, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18‐1605 REX A. FREDERICKSON, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. TIZOC LANDEROS, DETECTIVE, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Opinion TSOUCALAS, Judge: Plaintiff, The Torrington Company (“Torring-ton”), challenges certain aspects of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) final results of redetermination entitled The Torrington Company v. United States, Slip Op. 95-54 (March 31, 1995), Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”), filed on August 1

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Robert P. Young, Jr. Michael F. Cavanagh