Cases

742 F.2d 1436 Grimav.Philip Weiss Co. 83-7114 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. 5/20/83 1 S.D.N.Y. AFFIRMED

213 F.3d 55 (2nd Cir. 2000) PHILIP MARGO, MITCHELL MARGO, JAY SIEGEL, and HENRY MEDRESS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,STEPHEN J. KING and MITCHELL J. STEIN, Appellants,v.GEORGE DAVID WEISS, JUNE PERETTI, and LUIGI CREATORE, Defendants-Appellees,ABILENE MUSIC CORP., Defendant. Docket Nos. 98-9609(L), 99-7081(Con)August Term, 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT<

MAY, J. This case comes to us upon remand from the Supreme Court of Florida. Pratt v. Weiss, 161 So.3d 1268 (Fla.2015). We, previously affirmed, a trial court order, in which the trial court found an offer of judgment complied with the requirements of section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2004). The supreme court has now quashed our decision and held that the offer failed to

Becker, J. ¶1 — A civil lawsuit for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy is available to an employee only where no other adequate remedy exists to vindicate the public policy at issue. This rule requires reversal of a jury *348verdict that awarded damages to respondent Reba Weiss for her discharge from employment by appellant Judith Lonnquist’s law firm. <

MAY, C.J. This appeal challenges an attorney’s fees award, pursuant to a proposal for settlement/offer of judgment (“proposal”) in a medical malpractice action. The plaintiff, who prevailed against another defendant, appeals the fee award in favor of a defendant against whom he did not prevail. The plaintiff argues the fee award must be reversed because the proposal: (1) failed to apportion the offer between two separately nam

OPINION AND ORDER DORA L. IRIZARRY, Chief Judge Approximately 200 individuals and estates of deceased persons (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), brought this consolidated action against defendant National Westmin*639ster Bank Pic (“NatWest” or “Defendant”), seeking to recover damages from terrorist attacks in Israel and the Palestine Territories pursuan

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: In this action under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, 2 and the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2283, 3 we consider whether, following the approval of a federal class action settlement, the District Court properly enjoined

Opinion WILLHITE, J. —When a person challenges a parking citation, the Vehicle Code provides three potential levels of review: initial review, administrative hearing, and de novo appeal to the superior court. (Veh. Code, §§ 40215, subds. (a)-(c), 40230, subds. (a), (d).) 1 As to the initial review,

169 S.W.3d 888 (2005) Austin Michael WEISS, by his next friend, Kevin Joseph WEISS, and Kevin Joseph Weiss, Individually, Respondents, v. Sarah Marie CRITES, Appellant. No. ED 85021. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. August 30, 2005. *889 Gordon Rolla Upchurch, Philip E. Adams, Union, MO, for appellant.

MAY, J. A doctor, who volunteered his services to a high school football team, appeals a judgment against him in a medical malpractice action. On appeal, the doctor raises several issues. We have reviewed them all and find no basis for reversal. We also find no basis for reversal on the issues raised in the cross-appeal. We write however to discuss section 768.135(2), Florida Statutes (2008), in the context of requiring an exp

DORA L. IRIZARRY, Chief United States District Judge *226Approximately 200 individuals and estates of deceased persons (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), brought this consolidated action against defendant National Westminster Bank PLC ("Defendant"), seeking to recover damages from terrorist attacks in Israel and the Palestine Territories pursuant to the civil liability provi

OPINION OWENS, Circuit Judge: Intervenor-plaintiff-appellant Lance La-ber appeals from the district court’s denial of the motion for class certification brought by named plaintiffs Philip Bobbitt and John Sampson in their malpractice lawsuit against defendant-appellee Milberg LLP and various other law firms and lawyers (collectively “Milberg”). Becaus

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County *37(Louis York, J.), entered on March 3, 1998, which granted plaintifFs motion to vacate an order of the same court (Bruce Wright, J.), entered on or about December 15, 1994, which, upon reargument, dismissed the complaint, and directed that the case be restored to the trial calendar for an assessment of damages, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, an

PER CURIAM: * Linda Isner appeals the grant of summary judgment disposing of her misrepresentation and consumer protection claims against a number of attorneys and law firms. These attorneys and firms played leading roles, some on the side of the plaintiffs and others on the side of the defendant, in organizing a national settlement between users of the drug Vioxx and its manufacturer Merck &am;

464 F.Supp.2d 666 (2006) Philip C. WEISS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FUJISAWA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:05-527-JMH. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Lexington. November 28, 2006. *667 *668 David Robert Buchanan, Seeger Weiss LLP, New York, NY, H. Philip

Opinion MOSK, J. INTRODUCTION Richard Boeken (Richard) 1 brought an action against Philip Morris USA Inc. (Philip Morris) seeking damages for lung cancer he developed from

415 F.Supp.2d 720 (2005) Philip C. WEISS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FUJISAWA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.5:05-527JMH. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Lexington. December 28, 2005. *721 H. Philip Grossman, Fernandez, Friedman, Grossman & Kohn, Jennifer A. Moore, Fernandez, Friedman, Grossman &am;

MEMORANDUM OPINION Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge This case-was filed on September 22, 1999. In 2006, after a nine month trial, the Court ruled that the Defendant Cigarette Manufacturers had for decades conspired to deny the health effects of smoking in violation of RICO. USA v. Philip Morris, Inc., 449 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006) (“liability opini

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC12-1783 ____________ ANCEL PRATT, JR., Petitioner, vs. MICHAEL C. WEISS, D.O., et al., Respondents. [April 16, 2015] LEWIS, J. Pe

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge *133In 2006, Judge Gladys Kessler of this Court issued a 1,600-page opinion and a final judgment and remedial order in the above captioned case finding that the defendants had made false, deceptive, and misleading statements and mandating that they publish corrective statements as a remedy. See United States v.