⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Phillip A Ross”

Ross v. Jenkinspublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 2018-05-23 · Published · cited 31× · 325 F. Supp. 3d 1141
Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge Plaintiff Kendra Ross seeks default judgment against defendants Royall Jenkins, The Value Creators, Inc. (f/k/a The United Nation of Islam, Inc.), The Value Creators LLC, and The Value Creators, Inc. Doc. 23. The court held a hearing on plaintiff's motion on February 2, 2018. Plaintiff testified at the hearing and presented other evidence. Plaintiff's licensed
State v. Rosspublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-12-14 · Published · cited 1× · 362 F. Supp. 3d 749
RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge *752I. INTRODUCTION This action, comprising two related cases, arises from the U.S. Census Bureau's decision to include a question regarding citizenship status on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire. The plaintiffs in these two related cases contend the decision to include this
State v. Rosspublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-08-17 · Published · cited 0× · 362 F. Supp. 3d 727
RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge *731I. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of a decision by the U.S. Census Bureau, a division of the U.S. Department of Commerce, to include a question regarding citizenship status on the 2020 decennial census questionnaire. The census surveys the number of persons in each househo
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2019-07-25 · Published · cited 1× · 275 So. 3d 1090
KITCHENS, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. Loren Ross was convicted of felony driving under the influence (DUI), fourth offense. The Circuit Court of Rankin County imposed the maximum sentence of ten years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC). Ross appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by not polling the jury to assure that the jurors had been un
State v. Rosspublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2019-03-06 · Published · cited 1× · 358 F. Supp. 3d 965
RICHARD SEEBORG, United States District Judge *973TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF DECISION...973 II. BACKGROUND...976 III. STANDING...977 A. Legal Standard...977 B. Findings of Fact Related to Standing...977 C. Conclusions of Law Related to S
District Court, D. Kansas · 2008-04-28 · Published · cited 0× · 546 F. Supp. 2d 1219; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35391; 2008 WL 1891424
(2008) William O. REED, Jr., Md, Plaintiff, v. PHILLIP ROY FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC and Phillip Wasserman, Defendants. No. 05-2153-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge. This is a contract claim concerning a lease for a Cessna Citation II airplane. Plaintiff
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017-04-04 · Published · cited 1× · 215 So. 3d 514; 2017 WL 1238114; 2017 Miss. App. LEXIS 178
WESTBROOKS, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Stanley Ross Strickland was convicted in the Circuit Court of Neshoba County of two counts of statutory rape. Strickland was convicted of having sex with his underage biological daughter on at least two separate occasions. He was sentenced on each count to thirty years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corre
Ross v. Phillipspublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 913 So. 2d 771; 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 17955; 2005 WL 3050593
SILBERMAN, Judge. Roxanne Ross (the Mother) challenges the trial court’s visitation orders of February 13, 2004, and June 7, 2004, granting visitation with the parties’ minor child to Robert T. Phillips (the Father). Because the trial court erred as a matter of law in applying the standard for an initial visitation determination rather than the standard for a modification of visitation, we reverse and remand for further procee
In re Rosspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 326 F. App'x 567
PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
In re Rosspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009-06-04 · Published · cited 0× · 326 F. App'x 567
PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Ross v. Spitzerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 161 F. App'x 175
SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner-appellant Michael J. Ross (“Ross”) appeals from a judgment of the district court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts of this case, its relevant procedural history, and the issues on appeal. Ross argues that although he filed his habeas corpus petition fifty months after the expiration of the one-yea
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015-05-08 · Published · cited 6× · 104 F. Supp. 3d 729; 45 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20092; 80 ERC (BNA) 2242; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60343; 2015 WL 2172682
ORDER AND OPINION MARGARET B. SEYMOUR, Senior District Judge. I. Factual and Procedural , Background This case is the latest in a series that have been filed in which the parties have litigated liability for environmental contamination and sought to recover cleanup costs at the Columbia Nitrogen Superfund Site (the “Site”) in Charleston, South Carolina. See ECF No. 1 at ¶¶ 2-4; <
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015-08-21 · Published · cited 6× · 126 F. Supp. 3d 611; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111409; 2015 WL 5024349
ORDER AND OPINION MARGARET B. SEYMOUR, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the various post-trial motions of the Ross Directors, the Ross Shareholders, and PCS Nitrogen, Inc. (“PCS”). I. Relevant Factual and Procedural Background The claims in this case arise out of litigation that resolved liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Respon
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 127 F. Supp. 3d 568; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111963; 2015 WL 5122878
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW MARGARET B. SEYMOUR, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court after trial for final disposition of Plaintiff PCS Nitrogen, Inc.’s (“PCS”) cause of action for fraudulent conveyance. The claims in this case arise out of litigation that resolved liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) for
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2013-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-12-00283-CR ____________________ PHILLIP BRIAN ROSS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 639 S.W.3d 416; 2022 Ark. App. 17
Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 17 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and SPECIAL DIVISION integrity of this document No. CV-21-125 2023.08.09 11:34:53 -05'00' 2023.003.20244 Opinion Delivered January 12, 2022 PHILLIP J. JACKSON
District Court, D. Oregon · 2016-03-25 · Published · cited 3× · 180 F. Supp. 3d 745; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39286; 2016 WL 1181677
OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff Ross Dress For Less, Inc. (“Ross” or “Plaintiff’) brings this declaratory action against its two downtown Portland landlords, Defendant Makarios-Oregon, LLC (“Makarios”) and Walker Place, LLC (‘Walker Place”) (collectively “Defendants”). Ross seeks a judicial declaration that its proposed end-of-lease plans satisfy Ross’s obligations under the r
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-06-04 · Published · cited 83× · 488 F.3d 1057; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12864; 2007 WL 1584579
HOLLAND, District Judge. Appellants Phillip Carnes, Jennifer Carnes, Kathryn Schaller, Kevin Schaller, and H. Gene Carnes (“the Carneses”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for attorney fees and costs incurred in enforcing a judgment in their favor against appellees Michael A. and Nancy Zamani (“the Zamanis”). This appeal raises the question of whether Rule 69(a
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998-12-07 · Published · cited 1× · 247 B.R. 646; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19655; 1998 WL 1536984
247 B.R. 646 (1998) In re CAMPO ELECTRONICS, INC., Appellant, v. John K. ROSS, Appellee. No. Civ.A. 98 CV 2043. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. December 7, 1998. *647 Leslie A. Collins, Heller, Draper, Hayden & Horn, LLC, New Orleans, LA, Douglas Scott Draper, Heller, Draper, Hayden & Horn, LLC, New Orleans,
Michigan Supreme Court · 2008-04-23 · Published · cited 9× · 747 N.W.2d 828; 480 Mich. 153
747 N.W.2d 828 (2008) 480 Mich. 153 Desiree E. ROSS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Douglas G. Ross, Petitioner-Appellee v. BLUE CARE NETWORK OF MICHIGAN, Respondent-Appellant. Docket No. 131711. Supreme Court of Michigan. April 23, 2008. *829 Wachler & Associates, P.C. (by Andrew B. Wachler