Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Phillip Lankford Johnson”
Lankford v. Wrightpublic domain
489 S.E.2d 604 (1997) Barbara Ann Newton LANKFORD v. Thomas H. WRIGHT and Thelma Irene White, Administrators of the Estate of Lula Newton; Thomas H. Wright, Individually; Thelma Irene White, Individually; William Paul Wright; Jay Cornelius Knight, Jr.; James Robert Coffey; and Patricia Coffey Northern Coates. No. 308PA96. Supreme Court of North Carolina. September 5, 1997.
State v. David Leon Johnsonpublic domain
BEVAN, Justice. A jury found David Leon Johnson ("Johnson") guilty of two counts of lewd conduct with a minor child under sixteen. Johnson appeals, arguing that the district court erred in multiple ways and that his convictions should be vacated. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On August, 24, 2005, Johnson was indicted on three counts of lewd conduct with a minor child
United States v. James Willis Saget, Julius Phillip Hall, Herbert Nathaniel Johnson, Lamar Robersonpublic domain
MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellants were tried and convicted by a jury on charges stemming from a fifteen-count indictment handed down by a grand jury. Appellants raise numerous issues on appeal, including insufficiency of the evidence, erroneous evidentiary rulings, and improper sentencing. We find these contentions to be without merit and AFFIRM the convictions of each ap
Rose v. Johnsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction Petitioner Nathan Lynn Rose (“Rose”) challenges his 1995 conviction for aggravated robbery and forty-year sentence of imprisonment. Having reviewed the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the state court record, and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that Respondent Gary L. Joh
Rose v. Johnsonpublic domain
141 F.Supp.2d 661 (2001) Nathan Lynn ROSE, Petitioner, v. Gary L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent. No. CIV. A. H-99-2535. United States District Court, S.D. Texas. March 26, 2001. *662 *663 *664
United States v. Johnsonpublic domain
DECISION KASTL, Senior Judge: In United States v. Womack, 27 M.J. 630 (A.F.C.M.R.1988), we upheld the court-martial conviction of a non-commissioned officer who had AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). His offense was willful disobedience of an order of a superior commissioned officer under Article 90, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 890. That order, among other things, required him to take affirmative
Doe Ex Rel. Smith v. Johnsonpublic domain
817 F.Supp. 1382 (1993) Jane DOE and Infant Doe by her Next Friend John Smith, Plaintiffs, v. Earvin JOHNSON, Jr., Defendant. No. 5:92:CV:125. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan. February 18, 1993. *1383 *1384 Webb A. Smith, Theodore W. Swift, Michael J. Bommarito, Foster, Swift, Coll
Pack v. Mahanpublic domain
Blackwell, Justice. This is an appeal from an order directing the equitable partition by sale of 3.503 acres in Union County, real property in which appellant Brittany Pack and appellee Sidney C. Mahan, Jr., both have interests as tenants in common. Mahan sought the equitable partition and sale of the property, and in response to his petition, Pack urged that statutory partition w
Jackson v. Colvinpublic domain
ORDER AND OPINION KIMBERLY C. PRIEST JOHNSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On February 17, 2016, Plaintiff Mark David Jackson initiated this civil action pursuant to the Social Security Act (the “Act”), Section 405(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner’s denial of Plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the case was referred to the undersigned
Smith v. Statepublic domain
695 S.E.2d 679 (2010) SMITH v. The STATE. No. A10A0890. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 20, 2010. *680 Jennifer A. Trieshmann, for appellant. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, Dist. Atty., Deborah D. Wellborn, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. JOHNSON, Judge. A jury found Akeem Smith guilty of four counts of aggravate
08/08/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 14, 2025 Session INDUSTRIAL BOILER & MECHANICAL CO., INC. v. TYLER ANDREW EVATT ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 21-0126 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancellor ________
Lankford v. Holtonpublic domain
Jenkins, Justice. Every applicant Cor the benefits under the land-registration act (Ga. L. 1917, p. 108; Code, § 60-101 et seq.) must stand on the strength of his own application, and not upon the weakness of his adversary’s title. In proving such title as will entitle him to registration and a decree in his favor, the same rules of law apply as in suits for the recovery of possession of land by ejectment or statutory 'complaint
Lombardo v. Albupublic domain
4 P.3d 395 (1999) 197 Ariz. 340 Joseph LOMBARDO and Jacqueline Lombardo, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Elaine ALBU and John Doe Albu, Husband and Wife; Phillip Mercurio, Jr. and Jane Doe Mercurio, Husband and Wife; Century 21 Alliance and Investment Group, an Arizona Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 98-0113. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, De
Kinman v. Statepublic domain
Smith, Judge. Joseph B. Kinman was convicted of driving the wrong way on a one-way street and driving under the influence of alcohol. The trial *259court denied Kinman’s motion for new trial, and this appeal followed. Although Kinman contends that his motion to suppress certain evidence of his intoxication should have been granted, we find otherwise and affirm.
03/16/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 11, 2018 Session CHARLES MICHAEL VANCE, II V. ANGELA MICHELLE TAYLOR VANCE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 08D-2882 Phillip R. Robinson, Judge No. M2017-0
Johnson v. Oil Transport Co.public domain
JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge (dissenting) : This is a most troublesome area. I will contribute nothing to the Court’s running solution of its many variables by a too doctrinaire approach. Recognizing, therefore, that the answer is not easy I nevertheless think this opinion, when considered along with other recent ones, see e. g., Drake v. Dupont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 5 Cir., 1970, 432 F.2d 276, 1970 A.M.C. 1
Melissa A. Phillips v. Burns Phillipspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 27, 2015 Session MELISSA A. PHILLIPS v. BURNS PHILLIPS, ET. AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Cumberland County No. 2014CH816 Hon. Ronald Thurman, Chancellor No. E2015-00407-COA-R3-CV-FILED-OCTOBER 8, 2015 This is an unemployment compensation case. The employe
State v. Saenzpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 46262 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Opinion Filed: March 10, 2020 Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk v. ) ) ABDON ANDRE SAENZ,
Dillard, Chief Judge. *208 In this civil action, Harold and Judy Sharpe sued Phillip Gray, alleging that, while driving a vehicle owned by his employer, Harold suffered injuries when Gray's vehicle collided with his vehicle. Later, the Sharpes sought uninsured motorist coverage and, thus, se
Cooper v. Usco Power Equipment Corp.public domain
The plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant USCO Power Equipment Corporation. On December 15, 1992, Merle Cooper and Turnham Cooper filed a shareholder's derivative action against USCO, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, based on what they alleged to be USCO's excessive compensation of the company's chief executive officer, Benton T. Lankford. The plaintiffs also alleged that USCO was spending too much money was on employee benefits. On January 25, 1