Cases

A petition for certification of the judgment in A-002946-15 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied, with costs.

OPINION Opinion By Justice MORRIS. In this appeal following a trial to the court without a jury, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. challenges the trial court’s judgment in favor of Ray Robinson on his claims for wrongful foreclosure and breach of contract. In three issues, Wells Fargo contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1472 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PHILLIP ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1472 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PHILLIP ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

253 P.3d 1148 (2011) 2011 WY 101 Kelly David ROBINSON, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. S-10-0234. Supreme Court of Wyoming. June 29, 2011. Representing Appellant: Diane Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. Olson, Appellate Counsel; and Eric M. Alden, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel. Argument by M

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. We took this case in banc to resolve a conflict within the circuit. Castaneda v. Henman, 914 F.2d 981, 984 (7th Cir.1990), holds that a regulation allowing prison officials discretion to act for any reason except discipline does not establish a liberty or property interest for the purpose of the due process clause. An earlier case,

Opinion DAWSON, J. A former chief of police sued the city that had employed him, alleging breach of contract, wrongful termination, and violations of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBRA) (Gov. Code, § 3300 et seq.).1 The trial court determined that the city breached its obligations under POBRA when it removed the police chief from offi

Opinion DAWSON, J. Plaintiff appeals from (1) an order denying him attorney fees under California’s private attorney general doctrine, which is set forth in Code *387of Civil Procedure section 1021.51 and (2) an order applying section 998 to limit his recovery of costs to those incurred prior to defendants’ May 7, 2007, offer

{¶ 40} In considering whether the state presented sufficient evidence to convict Robinson of disrupting public services in violation of R.C. 2909.04(A)(3), I agree with the majority's analysis insofar as it concludes that the state failed to prove the element of substantial impairment.3 In my opinion, such conclusion renders moot the issue of whether the destruction of a private cell phone cons

O’Connor, J. {¶ 1} In this appeal, we must determine whether the damaging of a single private telephone or cellular telephone disrupts public services sufficiently to constitute a violation of R.C. 2909.04(A)(3). {¶ 2} The state asserts that the statutory language of R.C. 2909.04(A)(3) is unambiguous and plai

770 N.W.2d 421 (2009) 283 Mich. App. 677 CUMMINS v. ROBINSON TOWNSHIP. Berens v. Robinson Township. Nos. 279020, 279064 and 279088. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted December 9, 2008, at Grand Rapids. Decided May 12, 2009, at 9:20 a.m. *429 Corwin Law & Consulting, PL

MEMORANDUM WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge. In its March 3, 2009, Memorandum and Order, Paper No. 128, this Court granted a Motion for Reconsideration and For Leave to File Fifth Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Darzel Robinson on behalf of herself and all class members.1 Paper No. 111. In that motion for reconsideration, Plaintiff also asked this Co

Wahls, P.J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. *39On August 29, 1985, defendants robbed and murdered Paul Hutchins, an off-duty Michigan State Police trooper. They were convicted of second-degree murder, MCL 750.317; MSA 28.549, and armed robbery, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797. In the decade after these

ORDER HENRY T. WINGATE, Chief Judge. This case was removed to this court on April 4, 2007, from the Circuit Court for the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi. The defendants, Roxy Investments, L.P., a California limited partnership, and Freeman Webb Company, Realtors, a Tennessee corporation, also have filed a motion to dismiss [docket no. 14] for failure to obtain service of p

447 F.Supp.2d 478 (2006) Darzel ROBINSON Individually and on behalf of a class of borrowers similarly situated v. FOUNTAINHEAD TITLE GROUP CORP., et al. No. CIV. WMN-03-3106. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 9, 2006. *479 *480 *481 Richard

MEMORANDUM WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss In Part Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint” filed by Defendants, Fountainhead Title Group Corporation (Fountainhead), Assurance Title, LLC (Assurance), Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc. (Long & Foster), and Mid-States Title Insurance Agency, Inc. (Mid-States), Paper No. 78, and the

MEMORANDUM OPINION GEORGE L. RUSSELL, III, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on three pending motions, including Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s (“Chase”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Dean C. Marchese’s four-count Complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 11); Mr. Marchese’s Motion to Remand (ECF No. 13); and Chase’s

748 N.E.2d 624 (2001) 319 Ill. App.3d 459 254 Ill.Dec. 906 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Phillip ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2-00-0242. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. March 22, 2001. Timothy W. Johnson, Ronald G. Matekaitis, De Kalb County State's Attorney, Sycamore,

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner *780of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. After an investigation into petitioner’s claim that superficial cuts to his face were the result of

I, MURRAY, Judge. Tanika Williams and Byron Nedd, parents of the deceased child, Terrell Williams, appeal the judgment of the trial court in favor of defendants, Children’s Hospital, Dr. Carl Robinson, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. We affirm. FACTS: Terrell Williams, a sixteen month old boy, was seen in the emergency room of Children’s Hospital on February 5, 1995. Hi