Cases

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § DOLORES NARVAEZ, LUIS NARVAEZ, EDUARDO VELARDE, § JOSE JUAN VELARDE, JULIETA No. 08-17-00157-CV DURAN, LUZ MAGDALENA § ESCOBAR, AND JOSE ANTONIO

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § DOLORES NARVAEZ, LUIS NARVAEZ, EDUARDO VELARDE, § JOSE JUAN VELARDE, JULIETA No. 08-17-00157-CV DURAN, LUZ MAGDALENA § ESCOBAR, AND JOSE ANTONIO App

Benjamin Franklin described the snowballing consequences of inattention to a small detail — "For want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for want of a horse the rider was lost." (Oxford Dict. of Quotations (2d ed. 1955) p. 211.) In this case the missing nail is a check that was $3 short of the amount required to file a complaint for medical malpractice that allegedly caused the death of the plaintiffs' infant child. The harsh but unavoidable resul

*1279ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of defendant The Seattle Times Company’s (“Seattle Times”) motion to dismiss and motion pursuant to RCW 4.24.525 to strike claims. Dkt. # 7. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss shall be granted, and the mo

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of a motion to dismiss and motion pursuant to RCW 4.24.525 to strike claims, filed by defendant World Publishing Company, Inc., doing business as the Tulsa World (“Tulsa World”). Dkt. # 21. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss shall be granted, and the motion to strike shall

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of defendant KIRO-TV’s motion to dismiss and motion pursuant to RCW 4.24.525 to strike claims. Dkt. # 7. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss shall be granted, and the motion to strike shall be denied as moot. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Sonny Ray Hardaway appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s determination that a prisoner failed to exhaust available administrative remedies de novo and

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust on certain real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sweeney, J.), entered June 28, 2013, which denied her motion to vacate (a) an order of the same court (Spodek, J.), dated June 6, 2011, granting the plaintiffs unopposed motion for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability upon her failure to appear or a

[Cite as State v. Duran, 2014-Ohio-5208.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-13-1253 Appellee Trial Court No. CR90-5991 v. Richard Garcia Duran DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

Case: 22-51055 Document: 195-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 22-51055 ____________

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00179-CV Jose Duran and Maria Duran, Appellants v. JB Goodwin Realtors and Xuan Le, Appellees FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NOS. C-1-CV-12-012278 & C-1-CV-12-003023, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

644 P.2d 66 (1981) Michael S. DURAN and Daniel G. Trujillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Richard D. LAMM, Governor of the State of Colorado, Allen L. Ault, Executive Director of the Department of Corrections of the State of Colorado, and William Wilson, Superintendent of the Maximum Security Unit of the Colorado State Prison, Defendants-Appellants. No. 81CA0215. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.<

596 F.3d 1283 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Franklin DURAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-11446. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. February 16, 2010. *1286 Ira N. Loewy, Edward R. Shohar, Bierman, Shohat, Loewy & Perry, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant. Stephen Schlessing

GRANT, Senior District Judge. The Plaintiffs-Appellees are a certified class consisting of all pretrial detainees in the custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections. The Defendants-Appellants are Richard J. Elrod, the Sheriff of Cook County, Phillip T. Hardiman, the Executive Director of the Cook County Department of Corrections, the Cook County Board of Commissioners and

Opinion CORRIGAN, J. We encounter here an exceedingly rare beast: a wage and hour class action that proceeded through trial to verdict. Loan officers for U.S. Bank National Association (USB) sued for unpaid overtime, claiming they had been misclassified as exempt employees under the outside salesperson exemption. (Lab. Code, § 1171.) This exemption applies to employees who spend more than 50 percent of the workday

616 F.Supp.2d 1162 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ricardo DURAN-MORENO, Defendant. No. CR 08-1971 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. March 16, 2009. *1163 Gregory J. Fouratt, United States Attorney, Reeve Swainston, Joel R. Meyers, Assistant United States Attorneys, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff.

535 P.2d 505 (1975) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony E. DURAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 26219. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. May 19, 1975. John D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Jean E. Dubofsky, Deputy Atty. Gen., J. Stephen Phillips, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee. Rollie R. Rogers, Colorado State Public D

348 F.3d 1158 Ramon DURAN-HERNANDEZ, Petitionerv.John ASHCROFT, United States Attorney General; Michael Heston, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS"); and James W. Ziglar, Commissioner, INS, Respondents. No. 02-9513. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Decided July 21, 2003. Ordered Published October 28,

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge. The basic facts upon which plaintiff seeks to hold the defendant Phillips Petroleum Company [Phillips] liable are set forth in this Court’s earlier opinion dismissing the action against the Economic Development Administration of Puerto Rico [EDA] on the jurisdictional ground that EDA was an instrumentality of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and that since the Commonwealth was the real party i