Cases

OPINION AND ORDER MOSMAN, Chief United States District Judge Plaintiff Diane Randle has brought this employment action against her employer *1086Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (“TriMet”). TriMet filed a motion for summary judgment [28] and a memorandum in support [29] seeking to dismiss all of Randle’s claims. I find

338 F.Supp.2d 704 (2004) Tinnie RANDLE, Individuals Listed on Exhibit "A" and John Does 1-50. Plaintiffs v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION D/B/A Glaxosmithkline; Glaxo Wellcome, Inc.; Glaxo Wellcome, PLC; Glaxosmithkline, Inc.; Brian Phillips; Greg Ward; Amy Adams; Sales Representatives John Does 1-10 and Corporate John Does 1-5 Defendants No. CIV.A. 3:03-CV-746BN. United States District Court, S.D. Mi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CT-00433-SCT IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF LESTER RANDLE, DECEASED: TUMIKA RANDLE WEBBER AND SYLVESTER RANDLE v. DOROTHY MEEKS RANDLE ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/24/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WATOSA MARSHALL SANDERS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: JAMES KEVIN LITTLETON, III

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,720 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. RITCHIE D. RANDLE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court reviews instructional error claims in

Opinion issued July 14, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00454-CV ——————————— ADRIENE SIBLEY, Appellant V. CHARLES BERNARD ROBINSON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN HIS CAPACIT

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 234 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-22-723 TEVIN RANDLE Opinion Delivered April 19, 2023 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

Cite as 2022 Ark. 116 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-20-741 Opinion Delivered: June 2, 2022 CHARLES NEIL RANDLE APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 54CR-14-67]

47 Wn. App. 232 (1987) 734 P.2d 51 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. CHARLES EDWARD RANDLE, Appellant. No. 16412-1-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. March 18, 1987. Neil M. Fox of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for appellant. Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, Deborah J. Phillips, S

Cite as 2022 Ark. 116 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-20-741 Opinion Delivered: June 2, 2022 CHARLES NEIL RANDLE APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 54CR-14-67]

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This civil rights case, brought by Plaintiff El’Reko D’Wyane Randle pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against a number of prison officials, arises from serious allegations of abuse and neglect within the prison system. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Third Amended Verified Complaint (“TAC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Before us are petitions for leave to appeal under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, Pub.L. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4, from orders remanding two class action suits to Illinois state courts. The question the petitions present is whether amending a complaint to add or substitute named plaintiffs (class representatives) “commences” a new suit. Id.,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ No. 19-0459 ══════════ BLUESTONE NATURAL RESOURCES II, LLC, PETITIONER V. WALKER MURRAY RANDLE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE

565 S.W.2d 927 (1978) Delmond RANDLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 54341. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 1. May 10, 1978. *928 Russell C. Busby, Amarillo, for appellant. Tom Curtis, Dist. Atty. and Bruce Sadler, Asst. Dist. Atty., Amarillo, for the State. Before DOUGLAS, PHILLIPS an

ZIMMERMAN, Justice: Nilda Phillips appeals from an order enforcing an attorney’s lien. Nilda and her now-deceased husband, Elmer Lee Phillips, brought a medical malpractice action, initially retaining the law firm of Ungricht, Randle & Deamer (“the Ungricht firm”). Before any resolution was achieved, the Phillipses terminated their relationship with the Ungricht firm and hired new counsel. The new counsel negotiated a se

OPINION COLE, Chief Judge. A Kentucky jury .convicted Donald Phillips of two counts of first-degree murder. The jury considered the death penalty, but recommended life imprisonment with no possibility of parole for twenty-five years, which the judge imposed. For over six years, Phillips sought post-conviction relief in state trial court based on ineffective

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Eugene Brown is civilly committed to the Rushville Treatment and Detention Center under Illinois’s Sexually Violent Persons Commitment Act. The Act authorizes detention of persons who are determined through a civil proceeding to be a “sexually violent person.” See 725 ILCS 207/40. Brown and 17 others confined at Rushville sued the facil

NO. 07-01-0160-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 19, 2002 ______________________________ JOE REGINALD RANDLE, <

NO. 07-01-0160-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 19, 2002 ______________________________ JOE REGINALD RANDLE,

ORDER Jesse Phillips, an inmate at the Lawrence Correctional Center in Illinois, appeals from the dismissal of his civil-rights suit at screening. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. He principally contends that he received medication without warning of possible adverse effects. Taking his factual allegations as true for purposes of this appeal, Arnett v. Webster, 658 F.3d 742, 751 (7th Cir.2011), we conclude that he does not sta

NO. 07-01-0160-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D APRIL 19, 2002 ______________________________ JOE REGINALD RANDLE, Appellant