Cases

Long, J. At the present session the Legislature passed an act entitled “An act to establish a board of health for the city of Detroit.” 1 The act was approved by the Governor February 27, 1895, and took immediate effect. Under that act the board is to consist of four members, electors and freeholders in the city of Detroit, to be appointed by the Governor, by. and with the advice and consent of the Se

220 Md. 469 (1959) 154 A.2d 711 KLOZE v. PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK OF BALTIMORE ET AL. [No. 23, September Term, 1959.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided October 16, 1959. *470 The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ. Alexander P. Kloze, in proper person, for t

LEAHY, J. In this appeal, we address an employer’s duty under the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act (“MFEPA”), Maryland Code (1984, 2014 Repl.Vol.), State Government Article (“SG”) §§ 20-601 to 20-609, to reasonably accommodate a disabled employee seeking reassignment to another position for which he or she is otherwise qualified

965 S.W.2d 713 (1998) Clark PHIPPEN, Four Star Rv and Marine, Inc., Moped Traveland, Inc., and James Ted Williams, Appellants, v. DEERE AND COMPANY, Successor In Interest To John Deere Company, Appellee. No. 06-97-00077-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Argued January 28, 1998. Decided March 17, 1998. *715

This is an action brough by the plaintiff, by her next friend, in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County for damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff through the alleged negligence of appellants in causing and permitting their automobile truck to run into the rear of an electirc motorbus in St. Joseph, in which respondent was, at the time, riding as a passenger. There was a verdict for the defendants. Motion for new trial was sustained on the sole ground assigne

Clark, J. Defendant was convicted under an information charging him with having unlawfully transported and had in his possession a quantity of spirituous and intoxicating liquors.' The information was based upon section 2 of Act No. 338, Pub. Acts 1917, as amended by Act No. 53, Pub. Acts 1919: ' “Sec. 2. It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, himself or by his clerk, agent or

Sedgwick, J. Rhebe A. Goodman began this action in the district court for Johnson county to establish her interest in cer*228tain real estate in that county which she claimed as an heir of her father, Thomas Phippin. The district court entered a judgment in favor of the defendants, from which the said Phebe A. Goodman appealed. Afterwards she died, and the action was

Steere, J. Respondent was informed against and convicted in the January, 1915, term of the recorder’s court for the city of Detroit of violating the general liquor law of this State (Act No. 291, Pub. Acts 1909, as amended [2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 7032]) by engaging in the sale of intoxicating liquors without having first paid for and obtained a license so to do, and otherwise complied with specified prerequisites.

Plaintiff, as administratrix of the estate of her deceased child, Laverne, brings this action to recover the damages incident to her death, charging malpractice on the part of the defendant. The defendant attended the Palmer School of Chiropractic at Davenport, Iowa, for 14 months, and received a graduation diploma. After practicing for two years at Tipton, Iowa, he came to Grand Rapids. He did not comply with the law relative to registration of drugless healers in this State (2 Comp.

GRAVES, J. Plaintiff, a railway mail clerk, was injured by a collision between two of defendant’s trains. He sued for damages in the sum of $12,000, and recovered judgment for $11,800. From this judgment defendant has appealed, and thus his troubles reach this court. Whilst the answer is a general denial, yet the defendant made no contention nisi as to non-liability, but directed the force of its efforts toward the measur

Hackney, C. J. The appellant was charged by information with having on the 1st day of July,- 1897, ■ and continuously thereafter until the 1st day of January, 1898, unlawfully practiced dentistry without *248having first “obtained and procured a certificate of qualification and registration so to do, from the Board of Dental Examiners,” and without, during the period afor

Sedgwick, . J. The district court for Johnson county entered judgment pursuant to the decision of this court in Goodman v. Smith, 94 Neb. 227, and thereupon the defendants at the *286same term of court filed a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The district court overruled the motion, and the defendants appealed to this court.

Ostrander, J. The information alleges that respondent on July 22, 1914, and— *37“on divers days and times between that day and the 28th day of July, 1914, at the city of Grand Rapids, in the county of Kent aforesaid, unlawfully did engage in the business of practice of medicine, and did practice medicine, within the meaning of Act No. 237 of the Pu

I. Suit by widow for death of her husband under Federal Employers' Liability Act. Plaintiff recovered judgment for $17,000, from which defendant appealed. The petition alleged that, on September 15, 1920, the defendant was engaged in operating a railroad carrying freight and passengers to and from the States of Missouri, Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas and Tennessee. That her husband was the fireman of a switch engine and member of a switch crew in the yards of defendant at Springfield, Missou

Kuhn, J. The information in this case charges that the respondent,— “heretofore, to wit: on the 1st day of July, A. D. 1915, and on divers other days between that day and the 8th day of December, 1916, at the city of Battle Creek in the county of Calhoun aforesaid, did then and there practice medicine and surgery and did advertise and hold himself out to the public as being able to heal, cure and allev

Moore, C. J. The following statement is taken from the brief of counsel for petitioner: “ The petitioner and his associates caused to be prepared and executed articles of association for the incorporation of an electric-light company under and in compliance with the provisions of chapter 191 of the Compiled Laws of this State, and presented same to the secretary of State for filing, accompanied by the

Carpenter, J. Respondent, a druggist in the city of Charlotte, was convicted in the court below under an information charging him with keeping a place where intoxicating liquors were sold, in violation of the local option law in force in Eaton county; the same being Act No. 183 of the Public Acts of 1899. We are asked to set aside the conviction for several reasons. 1. It is contended

The information fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense. Our contention, among others, briefly, as expressed in the decisions of the supreme courts of the states of Washington, Wisconsin, Utah, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Nebraska, South Dakota and Michigan, where the same question has been passed upon, is as follows: That practicing medicine without a license is a statutory offense, unknown at the common law; that the statute defines what shall constitute the practice of me

Moore, J. The respondent was convicted of a violation .of a city ordinance, and has brought the case here for review. The facts are substantially the same, so far as the acts of the respondent are concerned, as the case of City of Muskegon v. Zeeryp, 134 Mich. 181. If you substitute the word “ Clow” for the word “ Zeeryp,” the word “Alma”for the word “Muskegon,” and the word

Montgomery, J. Act No. 212 of the Public Acts of 1899 provides for the examination and licensing of barbers. Section 5 provides for the examination of an applicant concerning his ability to prepare and fit for use tools and utensils used by barbers, including the proper antiseptic treatment of razors, etc., and the nature and effect of eruptive and other diseases of the skin and scalp, and whether the same are infectious or commu