Cases

WINCHESTER, J., dissenting: T1 The majority states their opinion does not balance "the rights of sex offenders against the rights of the offenders' victims." Yet, according to the Department of Corree-tions, Appellants, today's decision will affect a number of offenders in the State and will defeat the Act's very purpose which is the protection of victims, and the public at large, from the very real danger of

LUMPKIN, Vice Presiding Judge: Concur in Part/Dissent in Part. $1 I concur in the Court's decision to affirm the judgment and sentence in Count I, Murder First Degree. However, I agree with Judge Lile that the trial court took appropriate remedial action to correct the error in the heading of Instruction 14 and any error is harmless. [ 2 In addition, in its

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Byron White United States Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-3157 Patrick J. Fisher, Jr. Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk

FILED BY CLERK SEP 19 2008 COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA,

LAY, Chief Judge. In 1975 Edward Charles Pickens was charged by information in Arkansas state court with murder in the first degree pursuant to Ark.Stat.Ann. § 41-2205 (current version at Ark.Stat.Ann. § 41-1502 (1977)). Several weeks prior to trial the State amended the information to charge Pickens with capital felony murder pursuant to Ark. Stat.Ann. § 41-4702 (current versio

177 Ariz. 322 (1993) 868 P.2d 335 Frank and Lorain KADISH, Marion L. Pickens; and the Arizona Education Association, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARIZONA STATE LAND DEPARTMENT, an agency of the State of Arizona; Joe T. Fallini, in his capacity as the State Land Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 91-0110. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice. Frank and Lorain Kadish, Marion Pick-ens, and the Arizona Education Association, petitioners, brought a taxpayers’ action against the Arizona State Land Department and others. The issue raised is whether the fixed royalty provisions of A.R.S. § 27-234(B), permitting the land department to lease minerals on a flat rate royalty, violate the appraisal and true value provisions of the Arizona Enablin

TACHA, Circuit Judge. Petitioner appeals the district court’s denial of habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254, from his Oklahoma first degree felony murder conviction and death sentence. Petitioner received a certificate of appeala-bility, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), on the following issues: 1) his post-arrest statement was unconstitutionally o

HEANEY, * Senior Circuit Judge, with whom LAY, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from the Court’s decision not to grant appellant’s motion to rehear this appeal en banc. T.J. Hayes’ right to counsel was violated by the appointment o

GARZA, Circuit Judge: We have gathered en banc to consider the circumstances surrounding the arrest, interrogation, confession, and trial of Jerry Lane Jurek, convicted of murder and sentenced to death in a Texas state district court. A panel of this Court has reversed a federal district court’s denial of Jurek’s petition for a writ o

80 F.3d 1226 Kirt Douglas WAINWRIGHT, Appellant,v.A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction,Appellee.Kirt Douglas WAINWRIGHT, Appellee,v.A.L. LOCKHART, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Appellant. Nos. 94-3525EA, 94-3528EA. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 11, 1995.Decided April 8, 1996

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Jonas H. Whitmore was convicted in Arkansas state court of capital murder in the death of a sixty-two-year-old woman, Essie Mae Black, committed on August 14, 1986. Whitmore was sentenced by the jury to death by lethal injection. The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed his conviction and his sentence on direct appeal, Whitmore v. State, 296 Ark.

02/05/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 3, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PAUL MICHAEL CHEAIRS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 22-856 Joseph T. Howell, Judge ___________________________________

07/05/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 7, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DANA BAKER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 20-01 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge ___________________________________

07/03/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 23, 2024 Session KENNETH BARNETT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 122155 Steven W. Sword, Judge ___________________________________

05/28/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 2, 2019 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSEPH WOODRUFF Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 16-180, 16-181, 16-182 Kyle Atkins, Judge ___________________________________

Filed 7/28/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE GLENN MAHLER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A158696 v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF (San Francisco City & CALIFORNIA et al., County Super. Ct. No.

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION October 22, 2020 Plaintiff-Appellee, 9

04/21/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 2, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. QUINCY LAMONT COLLINS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 20-67 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge ___________________________________

02/11/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 4, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GREGORY GILL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 16-423 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge ___________________________________