Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2022-CP-01290-COA DARIAN A. PIERCE APPELLANT v. JAMES “SAM” SORRELLS APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/28/2022 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ANTHONY ALAN MOZINGO COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAMAR COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY

370 B.R. 64 (2007) In re ENRON CREDITORS RECOVERY CORP., et al., Reorganized Debtors. No. 01-16034 (AJG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. May 29, 2007. *65 *66 Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Martin J. Bienenstock, Esq., Brian S. Rosen, Esq., Sylvia Ann Mayer, Esq., of counsel, New York

ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2012 FED App. 0006P (6th Cir.) File Name: 12b0006p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: WILLIAM W. PIERCE, JR., ) ) Debtor. ) ______________________________________ ) ) VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND ) FINANCE, INC.,

KNOLL, Justice, dissenting. IJ disagree with the majority’s finding failure to comply with the notice and re-cordation requirements of La. R.S. 38:2247 does'not affect the right of a subcontractor to proceed directly against' the surety on the bond.1 For the following reasons, I respectfully dissent. Indeed, to the contrary, I find the surety is immune from suit unless the subcontr

212 B.R. 549 (1997) In re PIERCE MORTUARY COLLEGES, INC., Debtor. In re PROFESSIONAL TRAINING SCHOOLS, INC., Debtor. MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., American Standard Lloyd's Insurance Company, Amerisure Lloyd's Insurance Co., Employer's Fire Insurance Co., and Guaranty National Insurance Co. Plaintiffs, v. Pat W. FORREST, Jerre Kauck, Grace S. Self, Virginia Henderson, Betty J. Standridge, Frederick Bjerke, Jack Muse, Roger Scarlotti, Nan

343 B.R. 444 (2006) In re VERESTAR, INC., et al., Debtors. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Verestar, Inc., Verestar Networks, Inc. and Verstar International, Inc. for and on behalf of itself and Verstar, Inc., Verestar Networks, Inc. and Verestar International, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. American Tower Corporation, Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., Justin Benincasa, Norman A. Bikales, Alan Box, Arnold Chavkin, Steven B. Dodge, David W. Ga

¶1 — The issue in this case is whether Initiative Measure No. 776 (1-776) impairs bonds issued by the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit). Sound Transit was created to address traffic congestion in the central Puget Sound region. Pursuant to statute, Sound Transit was authorized to collect a motor vehicle excise tax (MVET) to finance a transportation system. In the years prior to passage of 1-776, Sound Transit issued and sold t

148 P.3d 1002 (2006) PIERCE COUNTY, a local government in the State of Washington; Gloria Irene Thein, a Pierce County resident, voter, taxpayer, vehicle owner, vehicle driver, and public transportation user; City of Tacoma, a local government in the State of Washington; William LaBorde, a Tacoma resident, voter, taxpayer, vehicle owner, vehicle driver, and public transportation *1003 user; King County, a local govern

376 B.R. 442 (2007) In re ENRON CREDITORS RECOVERY CORP., Debtors. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Enron Corp., et al., on behalf of Enron Corp., Plaintiff, v. Amanda K. Martin, Defendant. Amanda K. Martin, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Enron Corp., Azurix Corp., Azurix North America Corp., and AWS Corp. a/k/a AWS (Water/Wastewater) Corp. f/k/a Azurix North America Corporation, Third-Party Defendants.

OPINION SAM GRIFFITH, Justice. Virgil A. Pierce sued Washington Mutual Bank (the “Bank”) to remove a cloud on the title of his current home, claiming that home as his homestead. The Bank moved for traditional summary judgment, which was granted. In one issue, Pierce argues that a genuine issue of material fact existed in the case and, therefore, the trial court improperly granted summary judgme

208 B.R. 261 (1997) Lewis D. JACOBS and Stuart J. Jacobs, Appellants, v. Robert PIERCE, Appellee. In re Robert PIERCE, Debtor. Lewis D. JACOBS and Stuart J. Jacobs, Creditors, v. Robert PIERCE, Defendant. Civil Action No. 95-12557-REK, No. BK 89-13609-CJK, Adversary No. 92-1440. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. April 29, 1997.

282 B.R. 26 (2002) In re Bruce W. PIERCE and Tammy L. Pierce, Debtors. Bruce W. Pierce and Tammy L. Pierce, Plaintiffs, v. Beneficial Mortgage Co. of Utah, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-30416. Adversary No. 01-2367. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah, Central Division. February 26, 2002. Lee Rudd, Salt Lake City, UT, for Bruce W. Pierce and Tammy L. Pierce.<

173 B.R. 20 (1994) Lewis D. JACOBS and Stuart J. Jacobs, Appellants, v. Robert PIERCE, Appellee. In re Robert PIERCE, Debtor. Lewis D. JACOBS and Stuart J. Jacobs, Creditors, v. Robert PIERCE, Debtor. No. 89-13609. Bankruptcy Appeal Civ. A. No. 93-12176-REK. Adv. No. 92-1440-WCH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 20, 1994.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE FERRELLGAS PARTNERS L.P., § FERRELLGAS, L.P., BRIDGER § LOGISTICS, LLC, BRIDGER § ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES II, § No. 183, 2023 LLC, BRIDGER LAKE, LLC, § BRIDGER LEASING, LLC, BRIDGER § MARINE, LLC, BRIDGER RAIL § Court Below: Superior Court SHIPPING, LLC, BRIDGER REAL § of the State of Delaware PROPERTY, LLC, BRIDGER § STORAGE, LLC, BRID

OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL W. MOSMAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Great American Insurance Co. (“Great American”) brought this action against Defendants Matthew Linderman and Racquel Linderman, husband and wife (collectively, “the Lindermans”); and Jeff Waldien, along with two companies listing Mr. Waldien as registered agent, Precision Mobile Integration, LLC (“PMI”) and J. Waldien Designs (“JWD”) (colle

OPINION THOMAS H. FULTON, Bankruptcy Judge. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. (“Appellant”) appeals the grant of summary judgment by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky (the “Bankruptcy Court”) to Maxie E. Hig-gason, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee (“Appellee”) for Debtor William W. Pierce, Jr. (“Debt- or”), which avoids Appellant’s lien on Debtor’s manufactured home under 11 U.S.C.

200 B.R. 203 (1996) Jimmy PIERCE and J.E. Pierce Builders, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. John Mr. PYRITZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96 C 2264. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 9, 1996. *204 Whitman Henry Brisky, Lindenbaum, Coffman, Kurlander, Brisky & Hayes, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for defe

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STEARNS, District Judge. The issue in this case is whether a private equity firm seeking to protect its shareholders’ stake in a failing company succeeded in negotiating the delicate boundary between permissible self-help and de facto corporate control so as to avoid liability as a “single-employer” under the Worker Adjustment and Retr

42 F.Supp.2d 797 (1999) Lori PETTIT, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. RETRIEVAL MASTERS CREDITORS BUREAU, INC. and Russell Fuchs, Defendants. No. 98 C 1154. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 10, 1999. *798 Cathleen M. Combs, Daniel A. Edelman, James O. Lattur

Salinger, Kenneth W., J. The Court previously denied Zurich American Insurance Company’s motion for summaiy judgment [31 Mass. L. Rptr. 139). Plaintiffs Joseph and Janice Boyle claim that Zurich breached contractual and statutory duties to defend and indemnify C&N Corporation and Nicolas Rago against tort claims that resulted in a $3.7 million default judgment in favor of the Boyles, and to settle those claims once the liabi