Cases

Pierce v City of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 05814) Pierce v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 05814 Decided on October 18, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Pierce v City of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 05814) Pierce v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 05814 Decided on October 18, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Motion by the third-party defendant-respondent on appeals from (1) an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 13, 1996, (2) an order of the same court dated June 20, 1996, and (3) an order of the same court dated November 6, 1996, in effect, to recall and vacate the decision and order of this Court dated October 27, 1997, which determined the appeals. Upon the papers filed in support of the motion a

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff Yonkers Contracting Co., Inc., appeals (1) as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated March 13, 1996, which, upon a jury verdict, inter alia, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $2,000,000 for past pain and suffering and $500,000 for

OPINION OF THE COURT Arnold N. Price, J. In this action to recover damages for work-related injuries, the third-party defendant, plaintiff’s employer, moves for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. The third-party plaintiff (hereinafter Yonkers) was the general contractor on a highway renovation project. The third-party defendant (hereinafter Rice-Mohawk) was hired by Yon

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, defendant Board of Education and plaintiff cross appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 30, 1971. Said defendant’s appeal, as limited by its brief, is from so much of the judgment as (1) is in favor of plaintiff against it, upon a jury verdict as reduced with respect to the jury’s award on the conscious pain and suffering cause by plaintiff

COGAN, District Judge. This § 1983 excessive-force action arose out of an incident that took place on Labor Day, 2015. A RadioShack manager accused plaintiff of trying to steal merchandise. When police approached plaintiff and the manager outside the store on the sidewalk of Flatbush Avenue and asked to search plaintiff's bag, plaintiff, who at the time was a recreations manager and former personal trainer, took off running down the

626 F.3d 47 (2010) Edward D. MULLINS, et al., Plaintiff-Appellees, v. CITY OF NEW YORK and The New York City Police Department, Defendant-Appellants. Docket No. 08-1839-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: September 22, 2010. Decided: November 16, 2010. *48 Stephen P. Younger, (Clay J. Pier

634 F.Supp.2d 373 (2009) Edward D. MULLINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW YORK and the New York City Police Department, Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 2979 (SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 9, 2009. *377 Stephen P. Younger, Esq., Clay J. Pierce, Esq., Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York, NY, Andr

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Defendants the City of New York and the New York City Police Department (“the City”) appeal from an order of the district court, entered on March 21, 2008, and amended on April 10, 2008, preliminarily enjoining defendants from taking certain actions with regard to plaintiffs-appellees.

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Defendants the City of New York and the New York City Police Department (“the City”) appeal from an order of the district court, entered on March 21, 2008, and amended on April 10, 2008, preliminarily enjoining defendants from taking certain actions with regard to plaintiffs-appellees.

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. In this personal injury case arising from the collapse of a crane on a construction site, the jury found that the operation of the crane with an excess load, in violation of Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-8.2 (g) (2) (iii), amounted to negl

609 F.Supp. 798 (1985) CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. Samuel R. PIERCE, Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, City of Jersey City, New Jersey Waterfront Associates, and Bankers Trust Company, Defendants. No. 84 Civ. 9301(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 23, 19

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between appellant’s truck and an automobile in which respondent was a passenger. Judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.

Anaya v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 24223) [*1] Anaya v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 24223 Decided on August 21, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Kingo, J. Published by New York State Law Repo

Anaya v City of New York (2024 NY Slip Op 24223) [*1] Anaya v City of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 24223 Decided on August 21, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Kingo, J. Published by New York State Law Repo

501 F.Supp.2d 369 (2007) The CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. A-1 JEWELRY & PAWN, INC.; Adventure Outdoors, Inc.; Cole's Gun Shop, Inc., Dunkelberger's Sports Outfitters; Gallery Distributing Inc.; Greg L. Driggers d/b/a AAA Gun & Pawn Brokers; The Gun Store, Inc.; Harold W. Babcock, Jr. d/b/a Webb's Sporting Goods; James Thomas Farmer d/b/a Jim's Guns and Whatever; Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC; Nancy Dailey d/b/a Peddler's Post; Old Dominion G

Wiggins v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 06335) Wiggins v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 06335 Decided on November 16, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu

20-4238 Melendez v. City of New York In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 20-4238-cv MARCIA MELENDEZ, JARICAN REALTY INC., 1025 PACIFIC LLC, LING YANG, TOP EAST REALTY LLC, HAIGHT TRADE LLC, ELIAS BOCHNER, 287 7TH AVENUE REALTY LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants,