Cases

Donohue, J. Upon receipt of allegations of rape, members of the Milford Police Department initiated a routine investigation of the plaintiff, Jose Pinto (“Pinto”). On June 11, 1993, the Grand Jury voted not to indict Pinto. Subsequently, Pinto brought the present case based on the following counts: Count I Malicious Prosecution, Count II Abuse of Process, Count III Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Count IV Negligent

In the Circuit Court of Macon County the defendant was charged with feloniously manufacturing one-half gallon of intoxicating liquor commonly known as "corn whiskey." On a trial before a jury, July 3, 1924, he was found guilty, and his punishment assessed *Page 104 at three months in the county jail. He appealed from the judgment thereupon rendered. I. It is earnestly insisted by the appellant that a case was not made out, and his demurrer to the e

512 P.2d 1003 (1973) Al FARNSWORTH, Appellant, v. Dayton O. HYDE, Respondent, Dial Press, Inc., Defendant. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted May 3, 1973. Decided August 2, 1973. Michael J. Bird, Grants Pass, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Brown & Hughes, Grants Pass. Stanley C. Jones, Klamath Falls, argued the cause

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-471 Filed: 3 December 2019 Nash County, No. 15 CRS 52330 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ALI AWNI SAID MARZOUQ, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from order entered 28 December 2018 by Judge Quentin T. Sumner in Nash County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 31 October 2019. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant

*********** The Full Commission reviewed the prior Decision and Order based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Donovan and the assignments of error and briefs before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. Accordingly, the Full Commission reverses the Decision and Order of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The

671 S.E.2d 550 (2009) Mitchell TEAGUE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAYER AG; Bayer Polymers, LLC, n/k/a Bayer MaterialScience, LLC; Bayer Corporation; Crompton Corporation; Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc., n/k/a Crompton Manufacturing Company, Inc.; The Dow Chemical Company; E.I. *551 du Pont de Nemours & Company; Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C.; DSM Copoly

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: On April 17, 2012, Plaintiff Jacqueline Lionel commenced this action against Target Corporation a/k/a Target Stores (“Target”), in the Supreme Court of New York, Kings County, alleging a claim of negligence. Defendant removed the proceeding to this Court on October 26, 2012, based on diversity jurisdiction, and now moves for summary judgment

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Gamien Batchelor brings the above-captioned action against Defendants City of New York, New York City Department of Correction (“DOC”), DOC Commissioner Dora Shiro, Assistant Commissioner Richard R. White, Director Dennis Wall, Deputy Director Alexis Castillo and Chief of Department Larry Davis, Sr., alleging claims of race and g

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WEST PALM BEACH FIREFIGHTERS’ ) PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and ) all other similarly-situated Class A ) stockholders of MOELIS & COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0309-JTL ) MOELI

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Sylvia Bowen-Hooks brings the above-captioned action against Defendants City of New York, Commissioner David Frankel, Sheriff Lindsay Eason, Chief of Operations Timothy LaRose, First Deputy Sheriff Oliver Pu-Folkes and Chief of Staff Peter Sammarco, alleging claims of race and gender discrimination, retaliation

Deyton v. Estate of Waters, 2013 NCBC 25. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER 10 CVS 2582 ROBERT G. DEYTON, JR., M.D., and ) YVONNE S. DEYTON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

19 A.3d 193 (2011) 128 Conn.App. 646 HARTFORD MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION v. CITY OF HARTFORD. No. 31262. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued November 29, 2010. Decided May 17, 2011. *194 Saundra Kee Borges, corporation counsel, with whom was Ivan A. Ramos, assistant corporation cou

447 B.R. 51 (2011) In re Sean DOOLAN and Nicole Doolan, Debtors. In re Lori J. Gaff, Debtor. Lori J. Gaff, Plaintiff v. Town of Pembroke, New Hampshire, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-14300-JMD, 07-12763-JMD. Adversary No. 10-1053-JMD. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire. March 14, 2011. *53 Michelle Kainen, Es

Teague v. Bayer AG, 2007 NCBC 12 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE 05 CVS 90 MITCHELL TEAGUE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BAYER AG; BAYER POLYMERS, LLC, n/k/a BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE, LLC; ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: *937Plaintiff Authenticom, Inc., a data-integration firm, sued Defendants CDK Global, LLC and The Reynolds and Reynolds Company, the premier purveyors of dealer management systems, for violating Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and committing tortious interference. Both Defendants filed respective motion

GUARINO, J., Defendant Falkenstein, one of two defendants, has filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1035. The record to be examined on this motion consists of the pleadings, answers to cross interrogatories and depositions. Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1035 provides that: “(a) After the pleadings are closed . . . any party may move for summary judgment on

OPINION OF THE COURT Tom, J. Defendant, J. Leonard Spodek, was the guarantor of a mortgage, pursuant to a written guaranty dated September 2, 1987, on the building designated as 777 East 31st Street, Brooklyn, New York (the East 31st St. Building). The building was owned by Mr. Spodek’s wife, defendant Rosalind J. Spodek. It was in this building that Mr. Spodek illegally converted storage space in the southea

660 S.W.2d 322 (1983) STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Richard Berlin ALLBRITTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 46747. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. September 20, 1983. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied November 15, 1983. Application to Transfer Denied December 20, 1983.

MEMORANDUM NEWCOMER, District Judge. This is a wrongful death and survival action based on negligence and strict liability for a defective product. A jury returned a verdict of $473,298 against the defendant, and the defendant has filed motions for a judgment N.O.V. and a new trial. We will deny the motions. FACTUAL BACKGROUND The decedent in this case was killed on Septemb

91 F.Supp.2d 464 (2000) Claribel PAGAN-CUEBAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Roberto VERA-MONROIG, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 97-2772(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 27, 2000. *465 *466 Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Aldarondo & Lopez Bras, Hato Rey, PR, for counter-claimant