Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 50540 ROBIN LEE ROW, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) Boise, May 2025 Term ) v. ) Opinion filed: September 4, 2025 STATE OF IDAHO,

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated September 24, 1997, as conditioned the granting of its motion to vacate its default in complying with a prior order of the same court, dated April 7, 1997, and to extend its time to serve and file a note of issue, upon waivin

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 22, 1995 (People v Caldwell, 215 AD2d 681), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 25, 1993. Ordered that the application is denied. The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effecti

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), rendered June 26, 1996, convicting him of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a *427matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and a new trial is ordere

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Proceeding pursu ant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with the matter entitled People v Fontaine pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Indictment No. 2798/95, and to prohibit Justice O’Dwyer from presiding over that matter. Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), imposed June 17, 1993, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Ordered that the amende

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered December 6, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant contends that the jury should not have believed the testimony of the two victims who identified him because their descriptions of hi

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered January 25, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered October 19, 1993, convicting him of assault in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. A court in its charge need not marshal all the ev

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), rendered March 24, 1987, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, and sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial becaus

In a habeas corpus proceeding, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (West, J.), entered March 22, 1996, which dismissed the proceeding. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner’s assertions that his attorney acted without his consent when requesting an adjournment of his final parole revocation hearing are without merit (see, People e

—Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), dated January 9, 1995. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for the procedural reasons stated by Justice Hillery at the Supreme Court. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered December 20, 1989, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. A defendant asserting a claim of unlawful discr

Appeal by the defendant from *791a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.), rendered April 19, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

In proceedings pursuant to CPLR 5015 and 5240, the People of the State of New York appeal (1) from 16 orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), all dated September 5, 1992, one entered in each proceeding, which granted the motion of International Fidelity Insurance Company, as surety, to remit the forfeiture of bail of its principals and to vacate the judgments entered thereon to preclude enforcement of the judgments, and (2) from so much of 1

141 N.J. Super. 301 (1976) 358 A.2d 203 WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued April 6, 1976. Dec