Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Plain v. American Modern Home Insurance Company”
Johnson v. American Modern Home Insurance Companypublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DON L. JOHNSON, : C.A. No. K20A-03-002 WLW Plaintiff-below, Appellant, Vv. AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-below, Appellee. Submitted: October 2, 2020 Decided: January 26, 2021 ORDER Upon an Appeal from the Decision Of the Court of Common Pleas. Affirmed. Gary E. Junge, Esquire of Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, Delaware; attorney for Appellant. William A. Crawford, Esquire and Michael P. Torrice, Esquire of Franklin
Padilla v. Am. Modern Home Ins. Co.public domain
*1247Padilla then took advantage of his opportunity to reply to further address his breach-of-contract claim against Brown Insurance and Brown. See Tr. at 56:18-23 (Court, Romero). Padilla asserted that there are "lots of different claims related to failing to procure coverage," including breach of contract. Tr. at 57:4-18 (Romero, Court). Padilla contended
Jin Zun Zou v. American Modern Home Insurancepublic domain
ORDER DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge. This matter is before the court upon the cross-motions for summary judgment by plaintiffs Jin Zun Zou and Hua Ying Gao and defendant American Modern Home Insurance Company (AMI). Based on a *1052review of the file, record, and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the court grants plaintiffs’ mo
ORDER DENYING AHMIC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH INSURANCE POLICY TERMS Kane, U.S. Senior District Judge This case involves a disputed insurance claim for losses incurred by the burglary of a large vacant building in Greeley, Colorado. Defendant American Modern Home Insurance Company (“AMHIC”) moves for summary judgment, Doc. 55, against Plaintiff Summit Bank & Trust (“Summit
HARTZ, Circuit Judge. A bank obtained insurance on a commercial property mortgaged to it by a borrower. The policy prohibited an assignment “of this Policy” without the insurer’s consent. J.App. at 36. But after the property was damaged, the bank assigned its loss claim to the borrower. The insurer refused to pay the borrower’s claim because of the nonassignment provision, and
Trotter v. American Modern Select Insurance Co.public domain
ORDER JOE HEATON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Brenton Trotter and the company he formed in 2009, Trotter Doors, LLC (collectively “Trotter Doors”), sued American Modern Select Insurance Company (“American Modern”), the company’s insurer, asserting breach of contract and bad faith claims. Plaintiffs allege that American Modern breached the duties owed them under a commercial insurance policy when th
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: *1243 This appeal involves a complicated property insurance coverage dispute between an insurer and a landlord claiming through its prior tenant, the named insured under the relevant policy. The insurer, Ace American Insurance Company ("Ace"), appeals the judgmen
122 F.Supp.2d 114 (2000) RIVERDALE MILLS CORP. and James M. Knott, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. CIVA98CV40104-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. November 29, 2000. *115 Warren G. Miller, Boston, MA, for Riverdale Mills Corp, James M. Knott, Sr., Plaintiffs. Gregory P.
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INGENCO HOLDINGS, LLC, a No. 16-35792 Delaware limited liability company; BIO ENERGY D.C. No. (WASHINGTON), LLC, a 2:13-cv-00543-RAJ Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Dist
American Zurich Insurance Company v. Daniel Samudiopublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00478-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/18
Schatzman v. Modern Controls, Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WILLIAM SCHATZMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N24C-01-071-EMD CCLD ) MODERN CONTROLS, INC. and ) MICHAEL S. PEET,
OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois, appeals from the February 12, 2007 judgment entry of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, denying its motion for summary judgment, and granting the motion for summary judgment of *Page 2 appellee, American Modern Home Insurance Company, as assignees of Robert and Toni Oakman ("the Oakmans").
United States v. American Home Assurance Co.public domain
OPINION EATON, Judge: This matter is before the court on the cross-motions lor summary judgment of plaintiff United States (“plaintiff’ or “the Government”), on behalf of the United States Customs and Border Protection Agency (“Customs”), and defendant American Home Assurance Company (“defendant” or “AHAC”). ' See Pl.’s Mot. for Summ. J.
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
United States v. American Home Assurance Co.public domain
SCHALL, Circuit Judge. American Home Assurance Company (“AHAC”) appeals, and the government cross-appeals, the final decision of the United States Court of International Trade in United States v. American Home Assurance Co., 964 F.Supp.2d 1342 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014) (‘American Home ”). In its decision, the Court of International Trade made
Builders Mutual Insurance Companypublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Ex Parte: Builders Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, In Re: Palmetto Pointe at Peas Island Condominium Property Owners Association, Inc., and Jack Love, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Island Pointe, LLC; Leonard T. Brown; Complete Building Corporation; Tri-County Roofing, Inc.; Creekside, Inc.; American Residential Services, LLC d
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 1. This is an appeal of a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County, J. Mac Davis, Judge, granting summary judgment in favor of Jeffrey Brown, American Family Mutual Insurance Company, and Regent Insurance Company (collectively the defendants). The part of the judgment at issue here dismissed the consolidated actions of Hailey Marie-Joe Force, Me
2014 WI 82 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP2402 COMPLETE TITLE: Hailey Marie-Joe Force, a/k/a Hailey Marie-Joe Dziewa, a minor, by her Guardian Ad Litem, Joseph J. Welcenbach, Plaintiff-Appellant, The Estate of Billy Joe Force, by its Special
United States v. American Home Assurance Co.public domain
OPINION GOLDBERG, Senior Judge: This case is before the court on competing cross-motions for summary judgment. In this action on a bond, Plaintiff, the United States (“United States” or “the Government”), seeks recovery of unpaid antidumping duties from surety Defendant American Home Assurance Company (“AHAC”). The parties dispute (1) whe
James Snell v. United Specialty Insurance Companypublic domain
USCA11 Case: 22-12581 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 05/28/2024 Page: 1 of 56 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12581 ____________________ JAMES SNELL, d.b.a. Outdoor Expr