Cases

JAMES L. DENNIS, Circuit Judge, joined by GRAVES, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: I respectfully dissent from the court’s refusal to consider en banc the important standing issue in this case. In my view, the panel opinion committed serious error in concluding that the plaintiffs lack standing to bring suit under the Establishment Clause. The plaintiffs argue that HB 1523, a Mis

OPINION BRUTINEL, Justice. ¶ 1 The issue in this case is whether the Adult Protective Services Act (“APSA”), AR.S. § 46-455 (2011), subjects the state to an action for damages under that statute. We hold that it does not and, therefore, affirm the superior court’s summary judgment in favor of the State. I. ¶ 2 Jacob Braden, an adult with developmental disabilities,

Case: 22-20603 Document: 142-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 29, 2024

USCA11 Case: 21-13887 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 05/23/2024 Page: 1 of 33 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-13887 ____________________ PATRICIA BENTON LEE,

BOLIN, Justice. Dothan/Houston County Communications District and Ozark/Dale County E-911, Inc. (“the districts”), sued Century Tel of Alabama, LLC (“CTA”), and Qwest Communications Company, LLC (“Qwest”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the defendants”), seeking, among other things, to recover E-911 charges5 that the' defendants were alleged to have not properly billed and collected in accordance with the Emergency

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The Governor of Mississippi and the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Human Services appeal a preliminary injunction. Because the plaintiffs do not have standing, we reverse the injunction and render a judgment of dismissal. I. A. The plaintiffs challenge t

OPINION & ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge Plaintiffs here challenge a set of Wisconsin laws that have significantly changed the state’s elections. The most significant new law is 2011 Wisconsin Act 23, which requires voters to present one of several specified types of photo ID. But Act 23 and a handful of other new laws passed since 2011 contain approximately a dozen new provisions relating ■

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

20-1809-cv Dorce v. City of New York UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2020 Argued: January 27, 2021 Decided: June 23, 2021 Docket No. 20-1809-cv MCCONNELL DORCE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CECILIA JONES, individually and on beh

OPINION OROZCO, Judge. ¶ 1 The Estate of Jacob Braden (the Estate) appeals from the entry of summary *393judgment in favor of the State of Arizona and the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) of the Department of Economic Security (DES) (collectively, the State) on the Estate’s claim for statutory abuse or neglect under the Adult Protective

Filed 7/8/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A170169 v. (Napa County COUNTY OF NAPA et al., Super. Ct. No. 23CV001211) Defendants and Respondents.

FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge Mrs. Smith has lived in Milwaukee since 2003.1 She was born at home, in Missouri, in 1916. In her long life she has survived two husbands, and she has left many of the typical traces of her life in public records. But, like many older African Americans born in the South, she does not have a birth c

MEMORANDUM TAURO, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiffs Sarahjane Blum, Ryan Shapiro, Lana Lehr, Lauren Gazzola, and Iver Robert Johnson III, dedicated animal rights activists, bring this facial and as-applied challenge to the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (“AETA”),1 a criminal statute that prohibits acts of violence against animal en

By Judge Jonathan C. Thacher This matter came before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendants Martha Brightsen and Long & Foster Real Estate, Inc.’s demurrer to Plaintiffs Amended Complaint; (2) Defendants Prince William Real Estate, *91Inc., and David Baker, Sr.’s plea in bar and demurrer to the Amended Complaint; and (3) Defendants Roy and Roxann Barret

PAUL D. BORMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs filed their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Complaint challenging Defendants Nick Lyon (sued in his official capacity as the Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services "DHHS") and Herman McCall's (sued in his official capacity as the Executive Director

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT TERRENCE F. MeVERRY, District Judge. Presently pending before the Court is the DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, with brief in support (Document Nos. 17 and 18), the PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Document No. 27), and the REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Document No. 40).1 The issues hav

COCHRAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which PRICE, JOHNSON and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined. I respectfully dissent. I do not agree with the majority of the court of appeals1 that a rational trier of fact could conclude from the evidence in this case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that appellant (1) had a specific intent to hold or secrete eight-year-old Beatrice in a place where she was

Getty, J. “The Government of the United States, ... though limited in its powers, is supreme; and its laws, when made in pursuance of the Constitution, form the supreme law of the land[.]” Chief Justice John Marshall, McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316, 406, 4 Wheat. 316, 4 L.Ed. 579 (1819). <

416 F.Supp.2d 1286 (2006) Robert DRAKEFORD, Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SYSTEM, William Walker, and Gains Smith, Defendants. No. Civ.A.3:03CV1201WHA. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. February 6, 2006. *1287 *1288 *1289<

982 So.2d 43 (2008) Terrance Jamar GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D06-3190. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 10, 2008. Rehearing Denied May 16, 2008. *44 Bryan S. Gowdy and John S. Mills of Mills & Creed, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant. Bill McCollum