⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ponder v. Social Sec. Admin.”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-10-27 · Published · cited 14× · 140 F. Supp. 3d 94; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145348
MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, District Judge In February of 2005, the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) learned that Plaintiff Hugo Absalon Suarez, a recipient of Social Security benefits, had been deported to his native Mexico following a period of incarceration for gun and alien transportation convictions. By statute, Plai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAREN L. RYAN,  No. 06-15291 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v.  CV-03-02657- COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DFL/CMK Defendant-Appellee.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984-07-02 · Published · cited 50× · 736 F.2d 727
736 F.2d 727 34 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1514,34 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,406, 237 U.S.App.D.C. 118 NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, WASHINGTON, D.C. CHAPTERv.SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OF the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHAND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Prudential InsuranceCompany of America, Appellant. Nos. 76-2119, 76-2128, 76-2129, 76-2163, 77-1161, 77-1269and 77-1270.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984-05-25 · Published · cited 12× · 237 U.S. App. D.C. 118; 736 F.2d 727
Opinion'filed PER CURIAM. Opinion filed by Chief Judge SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, concurring in affirmance. Opinion filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA and Senior Circuit Judge McGOWAN concurring in affirmance. PER CURIAM: The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. Chief Judge Robinson concurs for the reasons set forth in his opinion. Circuit Judge Mikva and Senior
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010-12-30 · Published · cited 24× · 68 So. 3d 773; 2010 WL 5396114
Anthony Rogers petitioned for certiorari review after the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a judgment denying his claim for unemployment-compensation benefits. We granted certiorari review to reconsider prior Alabama decisions holding that the claimant has the burden of proving the *Page 774 absence of a disqualification for misconduct. Facts and Procedural History Rogers was employed by Penske Truck Leasing Co., L
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:25-cv-00943 (TNM) v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM ORDER Advocacy organizations serving imm
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-12-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-1066-JTL ) HORIZON KINETICS LLC, HORIZON ) KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, ) SOFTVEST ADVISORS,
Angov v. Holderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-12-04 · Published · cited 74× · 788 F.3d 893; 2015 WL 3540764
Opinion by Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Chief Judge THOMAS. ORDER The opinion and dissent filed on December 4, 2013, and published at 736 F.3d 1263, are hereby withdrawn and replaced by the amended opinion and dissent filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges Kozinski and Trott have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing, Judge Kozinski has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 602 F. Supp. 3d 1370
DYK, Circuit Judge. Teresa Chambers (“Chambers”) petitions for review of an adverse decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”). See Chambers v. Dep’t of the Interior, 110 M.S.P.R. 321 (2009) (“Chambers III”). The Board sustained Chambers’ removal from her position as the Chief of United States Park Police (“Park Police”). We
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-09-05 · Published · cited 0× · 66 F. Supp. 3d 178; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123787; 2014 WL 4387309
Re Document No.: 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting Defendant’S Motion For Summary Judgment RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Melvin Gresham brings this employment discrimination action against his employer, the District of Columbia (“D
Angov v. Holderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-06-08 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NIKOLAY IVANOV ANGOV, No. 07-74963 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A096-227-355 LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, ORDER AND Respondent. AMENDED OPINION On Petition for Review
District Court, District of Columbia · 2015-03-27 · Published · cited 31× · 85 F. Supp. 3d 183; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39509; 2015 WL 1472029
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROSEMARY M. COLLYER United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. 13, 21 and 26. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant the motions and dismiss this action. 1 I. BACKGR
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-06-18 · Published · cited 25× · 961 F.3d 800
Case: 19-60133 Document: 00515457870 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-60133 FILED
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2011-09-13 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION Plaintiff labor unions1 ("Plaintiffs") filed the underlying action against the Governor and General Treasurer of the State of Rhode Island, the Employees' Retirement *Page 2 System of the State of Rhode Island ("ERSRI"), by and through the Rhode Island Retirement Board ("Retirement Board"), and the Chairman and Secretary of the Reti
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014-10-27 · Published · cited 74× · 770 F.3d 485; 2014 FED App. 0269P; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 20645; 2014 WL 5419936
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0269p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ JAMES FRAZIER, ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-10-04 · Published · cited 10× · 975 F. Supp. 2d 151; 2013 WL 5498182; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144700
*153 MEMORANDUM YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case illustrates the value of a jury-trial in an adjudicatory system apparently devoted almost entirely to efficiency. Its broad outlines are briefly limned. The well-prepared plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment. Its outcome was all but a foregone con
Collins v. Yellenpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-06-23 · Published · cited 83× · 594 U.S. 220
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Collins v. Yellenpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
7/28/2021 12:36:49 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-422.pdf 19-422_new.pdf versus 81 pages (405 KB) 81 pages (400
Collins v. Yellenpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-06-23 · Published · cited 0× · 594 U.S. 220
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Collins v. Yellenpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2021-06-23 · Published · cited 0× · 594 U.S. 220
6/23/2021 3:37:48 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-422.pdf 19-422_new.pdf versus 81 pages (401 KB) 81 pages (401 KB)