Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Pope v. City of Boston”
Wright v. City of Albanypublic domain
306 F.Supp.2d 1228 (2003) William WRIGHT, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ALBANY, et. al., Defendants. No. 1:03-CV-148-1(WLS). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Albany Division. December 24, 2003. *1229 Neil T. Bradley, Laughlin McDonald, Meredith Elaine Barnes-Bell, Atlanta, GA, for William Wright, Emma A.D. Branch-Dav
Ronald Williams v. City of Kansas City, Missouripublic domain
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT en banc RONALD WILLIAMS, ) ) Respondent, ) WD83835 v. ) (Consolidated with WD83938) ) ) OPINION FILED: CITY
McMurtry v. City of Largopublic domain
837 F.Supp. 1155 (1993) Walter P. McMURTRY, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF LARGO, Florida Municipal Corporation, Defendant. No. 93-959-Civ-T-17C. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. November 10, 1993. *1156 Walter P. McMurtry, pro se. Marion Hale, Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A.,
98 F.Supp.2d 1380 (2000) UPPER CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER FUND, et al., Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF ATLANTA, Defendant. The United States of America and The State of Georgia, Plaintiffs, v. The City of Atlanta, Defendant. Nos. Civ.A.1:95CV2550TWT, Civ.A.1:98CV1956TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. May 30, 2000.
Fulton v. City of Phila.public domain
Tucker, District Judge The gratitude we owe to all those working to better the lives of Philadelphia's most vulnerable children is too great to convey in words. While our gratitude is ultimately ineffable, the Court still begins by recognizing the Parties in this case for their many years of sacrifice and labor. The Court thanks Sharonell Fulton, Cecelia Paul, Toni Lynn Simms-Busch, Catholic Social Services ("CSS"), the City of Phil
Sharonell Fulton v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
AMBRO, Circuit Judge A reporter from the Philadelphia Inquirer informed the City of Philadelphia's Department of Human Services in March 2018 that two of its agencies would not work with same-sex couples as foster parents. Human Services investigated this allegation, which it considered a violation of the City's anti-discrimination laws. When the agencies confirmed that, because of their relig
Sharonell Fulton v. City of Philadelphiapublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ No. 18-2574 SHARONELL FULTON; CECELIA PAUL; TONI LYNN SIMMS-BUSCH; CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES, Appellants v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; PHILADELPHIA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS SUPPORT CENTER FO
Pope v. Statepublic domain
632 A.2d 73 (1993) Hubert Julian POPE, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: September 14, 1993. Decided: October 20, 1993. Anthony A. Figliola, Jr. of Figliola & Faciolo, Wilmington, for appellant. Richard E. Fairbanks, Jr., Chief of Appeals Div., Dept. of Justice, Wilmington, f
Amanda Kondrat'yev v. City of Pensacola, Floridapublic domain
Case: 17-13025 Date Filed: 09/07/2018 Page: 1 of 82 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-13025 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cv-00195-RV-CJK AMANDA KONDRAT’YEV, ANDREIY KONDRAT’YEV, ANDRE RYLAND, DAVID SUHOR,
Amanda Kondrat'yev v. City of Pensacola, Floridapublic domain
PER CURIAM: The City of Pensacola, Florida appeals a district court decision ordering it to remove a 34-foot Latin cross from a public park on the ground that the City's maintenance of the cross violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause. Having concluded that we are bound by existing Circuit precedent, we find ourselves constrained to affirm.
735 F.Supp.2d 1348 (2010) J.D.P. a minor by his next friend Martin Pope his father, and Martin Pope, Plaintiffs, v. CHEROKEE COUNTY, GEORGIA SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. Civil Action File No. 1:08-cv-165-TCB. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 18, 2010. *1349 Ted B. Herbert, Law Office of
Considine v. City of Waterburypublic domain
Opinion VERTEFEUILLE, J. The defendant, the city of Waterbury, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Edward Considine. The defendant contends that the trial court improperly determined that governmental immunity as set forth in General Statutes § 52-557n1 did not shield it from liability and that the plaintiff had proffered suf
City of Norwood v. Horneypublic domain
O’Connor, J. {¶ 1} In case Nos. 2005-1210 and 2005-1211, we decide the constitutionality of a municipality’s taking of an individual’s property by eminent domain and transferring the property to a private entity for redevelopment. In doing so, we must balance two competing interests of great import in American democracy: the individual’s rights in the possession and security of property and the sovereign’s power to take priv
383 F.Supp.2d 269 (2005) BOSTON ARCHDIOCESE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff v. ARCHDIOCESAN CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOLS, INC., et al. Defendants No. 04-11197. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 15, 2005. *270 Wilson D. Rogers, III, The Rogers Law Firm, Boston, MA, Sean P. Sweeney, Murphy, Lamere & Murphy P.C., Br
Southern Waste Systems, LLC v. City of Coral Springspublic domain
687 F.Supp.2d 1342 (2010) SOUTHERN WASTE SYSTEMS, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; and Sun Recycling, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA, a Florida Municipal Corporation; Waste Management, Inc. of Florida, a Florida Corporation, and the Broward Solid Waste Disposal District, a Florida Dependent Special District, Defendants. Case No. 06-61448-CIV.
City of Milwaukee v. Burnettepublic domain
248 Wis.2d 820 (2001) 2001 WI App 258 637 N.W.2d 447 CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michelle M. BURNETTE, Yolanda C. Jenkins, Vivian V. Nicholson, Theresa A. Roth, and Patricia Wheeler, Defendants-Appellants,[] Tanya M. BEAN, Marvin T. Blount, Tracy A. Blue, Jansee R. Boens, Schonda F. Butcher, Teresa M. Chojnacki, Deborah A. Darby, Ruthann Dzibinski, Carmen M. Estrada,
NORTH PACIFICA, LLC. v. City of Pacificapublic domain
366 F.Supp.2d 927 (2005) NORTH PACIFICA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PACIFICA, et al., Defendants. No. C-01-4823 EMC. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 28, 2005. Jaquelynn C. Pope, Mark D. Warshaw, Hermosa Beach, CA, for Plaintiff. Kevin Drake Siegel, Benjamin Louis Stock, Megan Holt Matthew, Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, Natalie Elsa West, Oak
Boston Water Power Co. v. City of Bostonpublic domain
Shaw, C. J. The court are of opinion that the plaintiffs are not liable to be taxed for personal estate or income. The whole value of their personal estate is included in the value of the shares of the stock, and, as such, is liable to be taxed to the holders of the shares eo nomine. By the Rev. Sts. c. 7, § 4, “ personal estate shall, for the purposes of taxation, be construed to include stocks in turnpikes, br
Smith v. City of Atlantapublic domain
ORDER FORRESTER, District Judge. This employment discrimination action is before the court on Plaintiffs appeal from the adverse judgment entered against him in a bench trial held on his claims by Magistrate Judge William L. Harper, and on this court’s sua sponte inquiry into its subject matter jurisdiction. I. Statement of the Case On Octob
Pope v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.public domain
This was an action by the widow and three children of Thos. A. Pope to recover of the Kansas City, Mexico Orient Railway Company of Texas damages for the death of Thos. A. Pope while engaged in the railway company's service as a locomotive engineer, the death being alleged to have resulted from the negligence of a conductor in the employ of the railway company, in giving a certain signal. The amended original petition, on which the case was tried, did not allege whether the railway co