Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “Portee v. Ashcroft”
United States v. Bryant Lovepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2131 & 20-2297 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. BRYANT LOVE, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the
WV Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority v. The Estate of COdy Lawrence Grovepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA September 2020 Term _____________ FILED November 20, 2020 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 18-1076 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK _____________ SUPREME COURT OF AP
Lockhart v. Willingboro High Schoolpublic domain
OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION This is an action by Tasia Lockhart (“Tasia”) and her legal guardians, Robbie Lockhart and James Lockhart, seeking to hold Willingboro High School and other related defendants responsible for a sexual assault against Tasia committed by another student while school was in session. Presently before the Court is the motion o
Thomas v. East Orange Board of Educationpublic domain
OPINION WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge: Plaintiff Katina Thomas, guardian ad litem for K.T. (a minor), brings this action against East Orange Board of Education (“EOBE”), Superintendent Dr. Gloria Scott, John Does (1-10), Jane Does (1-10), and ABC Corp. (1-10) (collectively “Defendants”), alleging various state and federal statutory, constitutional and common law claims. Plaintiffs claims arise from Defe
George v. Board of Educationpublic domain
*448OPINION WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge. Plaintiffs O.G., Daryl George, and Brenda Barnes-George allege race-based discrimination at Millburn High School. Plaintiffs further allege that the Board of Education of the Township of Millburn (the “Board”) violated O.G.’s due process rights when it expelled O.G. from school. The four Defendants — the
Panarello v. City of Vinelandpublic domain
OPINION KUGLER, United State District Judge: This civil rights suit arises from a series of disputes between Plaintiff John Panarel-lo (“Panarello”) and his wife, Plaintiff Sheri Panarello1 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and their neighbors, Defendant Detective *741Antonio “Pete” Ramos (“Ramos”) and his wife, Defendant Je
Potash v. Florida Union Free School Districtpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. Plaintiff Carol Potash (“Plaintiff’) brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging gender discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against the Florida Union Free School District (the “District”), Douglas Burnside, *564Superinten
Murray v. Visiting Nurse Services of New Yorkpublic domain
528 F.Supp.2d 257 (2007) Joseph MURRAY, Plaintiff, v. VISITING NURSE SERVICES OF NEW YORK, and Howard Frey, Defendants. No. 05-CV-5462 (RJS)(KNF). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 31, 2007. *258 *259 *260 Gregory Scolieri, Esq., Rick Ost
Mr. Chief Justice Prewitt delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a test suit challenging the validity of a school bond referendum in Cocke County in 1958. The Quarterly Court submitted the question of issuance of $1,530,000.00 in school bonds to a referendum vote of the people on November 8, 1958. The referendum carried by a twenty-one vote margin. Only eight days strict legal notice was