Cases

PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be.enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of

WYNN, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Thomas Porter, Anthony Juniper, and Mark Lawlor 1 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) — three inmates on Virginia’s death row — alleged that their conditions of confinement amounted to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. After Plaintiffs filed their complaint, Defend

33 So.3d 30 (2009) Allen Forrest PORTER, Jr. v. STATE of Alabama. CR-07-0471. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. March 20, 2009. Rehearing Denied April 10, 2009. Certiorari Quashed September 11, 2009. Alabama Supreme Court 1080912. Mari Morrison, Birmingham, for appellant. Troy King, atty. gen., and Yvonne A.H. Saxon, asst

2006 WY 161 DOUGLAS MORRISON, CHARLES W. SMITH, and RONALD HANSEN, in their representative capacities as Trustees of the Newell B. Sargent 1990 Living Trust, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. FORREST L. CLAY and F. KELLY CLAY, Appellees (Defendants/Counterclaimants). Nos. 05-281, 06-21 Supreme Court of Wyoming. OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2006. December 28, 2006. Representing Appe

626 S.E.2d 500 (2006) 280 Ga. 222 MORRISON v. The STATE (two cases). Nos. S05G1136, S05G1147. Supreme Court of Georgia. February 13, 2006. *501 Angela Brown Dillon, Brown & Gill, L.L.C., Norcross, for Appellant. Daniel J. Porter, Dist. Atty., Matthew David Crosby, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lawrencevill

611 S.E.2d 720 (2005) 272 Ga. App. 34 MORRISON v. The STATE (Two Cases). Nos. A04A1739, A04A1740. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 8, 2005. *722 Charles Joyner, Buford, Brown & Gill, Angela Brown, Jonesboro, for Appellant. Daniel Porter, District Attorney, Matthew Crosby, Assistant District At

Halpern and Holmes, JJ., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I. Concurrence We concur in so much of the majority opinion as holds the appropriate standard of review to be de novo. We do so notwithstanding our dissent in the Court’s prior report in this case, Porter v. Commissioner, 130 T.C. 115, 146-147 (2

O’Neill, J., dissenting. {¶ 76} I join Justice Lanzinger’s well-written dissent. Let’s be clear here. The Ohio General Assembly has created a zookeeper to feed the elephant in the living room. What the drilling industry has bought and paid for in campaign contributions it shall receive. The oil and gas industry has gotten its way, and local control of drilling-location decisions has been unceremoniously taken

SUZANNE L. PORTER, A.K.A. SUZANNE L. HOLMAN, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentPorter v. Comm'rNo. 13558-06United States Tax Court

[Cite as Porter v. Porter, 2020-Ohio-4504.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY TONITA PORTER, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2019-11-185 : OPINION - vs -

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Daily Servs., L.L.C. v. Morrison, Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-2151.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohi

[Cite as Morrison v. Morrison, 2014-Ohio-2254.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) BRANDY M. MORRISON C.A. No. 27150 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE CHAD J. MORRISON, SR.

PER CURIAM. This is a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. *217Plaintiff appeals from a decree dismissing plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff’s claim arises out of work performed and labor furnished in connection with the drilling of a well for defendant upon the basis of a written contract. Defendant contests the foreclosure on the ground that plainti

576 N.W.2d 869 (1998) 1998 SD 33 Maggie MORRISON, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MINERAL PALACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Thomas R. Nelson and Melodee Nelson, general partners, Defendants and Appellants. No. 20080. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued January 14, 1998. Decided April 1, 1998. John J. Delaney of Estes, Porter &

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2022 WY 26 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2021 February 18, 2022 JOHN DAVID MORRISON, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-21-0126 PEGGY SUE RUBIO f/k/a PEGGY SUE MORRISON, Appellee (Pl

MEMORANDUM ORDER DONALD J. PORTER, District Judge. Defendant Sanford Morrison has moved for withdrawal of his guilty plea under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(d). As the basis for his motion, defendant asserts that he is innocent of the charge to which he pleaded guilty and that the victim of the alleged rape has recanted her accusations. Defendant was indicted on a charge of Aggravated Sexual Abuse. On

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Charles Porter pled guilty to five counts of mail fraud and one count of wire fraud, and now challenges the sentence he received under the Sentencing Guidelines. He contends that the district court erred in calculating the amount of loss under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, in adding a two-level enhancement for obstruction of justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1,

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-2132 _____________________________ GOIDIA PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Stephen S. Everett, Judge. May 8, 2024 B.L. THOMAS, J. Appellant challenges his c

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Patrick J. Morrison (“Plaintiff’), who is proceeding pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that his constitutional rights were violated while he was incarcerated at Attica Correctional Facility (“Attica”), in the custody of the New York State Department of Correction and C

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-21-00404-CV __________________ KYLE KILWAY, Appellant V. TAYLOR MORRISON OF TEXAS, INC., Appellee _____________________________________________________