Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Powell v. Carnival Cruise Lines Inc”
Boehnen v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.public domain
778 So.2d 1084 (2001) Vivian L. BOEHNEN, etc., et al., Appellants, v. CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 3D99-2001. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 7, 2001. Ginsberg & Schwartz, and Todd R. Schwartz; and Allison & Robertson, Miami, for appellants. Mase & Gassenheimer, and Richard D. Lara, and Rachel S. C
Doe v. Carnival Corp.public domain
ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant, Carnival Corporation’s (“Carnivalf’s]”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (“Motion”) [ECF No. 9], filed July 17, 2012. Plaintiff, Jane Doe, “a minor, by and through her mother, natural guardian and best friend, Susan Doe,” filed a Complaint [ECF No. 1] sounding in negligence against Carnival on J
Leslie v. Carnival Corp.public domain
SHEPHERD, J., concurring. I write further in this case only to offer the following additional considerations to balance those suggested by the dissent.2 The issue in these cases is whether the respective trial courts erred by enforcing a forum-selection clause in form contracts issued by Carnival Cruise Lines to four of its fare-paying customers, which requires
In Re Carnival Corp.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 231 OPINION ON REHEARING Relator Carnival Corporation seeks mandamus relief from a death penalty sanction imposed by the trial court.1 Carnival contends the trial court abused its discretion when, as its first order in this dis
in Re Carnival Corporationpublic domain
Opinion issued April 6, 2006 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of T
Carnival Corp. v. Beverlypublic domain
744 So.2d 489 (1999) CARNIVAL CORPORATION, a/k/a Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., Curtis J. Mase, and Mase & Sreenan, P.A., Petitioners, v. Yvonne BEVERLY, Respondent. No. 98-2337. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 16, 1999. Rehearing Denied November 12, 1999. *490 Beverly D. Eisensta
Adidas America, Inc. v. Cougar Sport, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge. In this lawsuit, adidas America, Inc. and adidas AG (collectively, “Adidas”) allege claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, trademark dilution, and deceptive trade practices against Cougar Sport, Inc. (“Cougar Sport”). Cougar Sport has moved to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, or, alternatively, to tran
The State of Texas v. YELP, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 15-24-00040-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Waguespack v. Medtronic, Inc.public domain
RULING JAMES J. BRADY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA These matters are before the Court on two motions. The first is a Motion for *921Preliminary Injunction (Doe. 4) brought by the Plaintiffs.1 The Defendants2 have filed an Opposition (Doc. 22). The second motion
Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.public domain
782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille
State v. LG Electronics, Inc.public domain
González, J. ¶1 The State of Washington sued more than 20 foreign electronics manufacturing companies (including the petitioners) for price fixing. The State claimed the foreign companies conspired to fix prices by selling CRTs (cathode ray tubes) into international streams of commerce intending they be incorporated into products sold at inflated prices in large numbers in Washington State. ¶2 The trial court d
State v. LG Elecs., Inc.public domain
ThijfPlr.tion was fll~ m~:~1r~1 'l at ·UU t&m on~1y 'tw---t:A~ Supreme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 91391-9 ) v.
Herman v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.public domain
ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 93) filed by Plaintiffs, Jason Herman, William Cohen, Joey Kratt, and Christina Lancaster, the Response in opposition thereto (Dkt. 99) filed by Defendant, SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment, Inc. (“SeaWorld”), and the Supplement (Dkt. 115) filed by Plaintiffs;
United States v. Transocean Deepwater Drilling, Inc.public domain
JONES, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully disagree with the majority opinion, which assists the United States Chemical Safety Board (“CSB”) in expanding its jurisdiction into novel territory disallowed by Congress. This is the first time, in twenty years after CSB was ordained, that the agency has sought to investigate in connection with an offshore oil spill.1 The majority’
Allied Dynamics Corp. v. Kennametal, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Allied Dynamics Corporation (“plaintiff’ or “Allied”) brings this action against Kennametal, Inc. (“Kennametal”) and Kennametal Stellite, formerly known as Microfusione Stellite S.p.A., (“MFS”) (collectively, “defendants”), alleging causes of action for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and replevin.
Chudner v. TransUnion Interactive, Inc.public domain
626 F.Supp.2d 1084 (2009) Jeffrey CHUDNER, Plaintiff, v. TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a foreign corporation, and TransUnion LLC, a foreign limited liability company, Defendants. Civil Case No. 08-1103-AC. United States District Court, D. Oregon. June 8, 2009. *1085 Steve D. Larson, Joshua L. Ross, Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting &
Hofer v. Gap, Inc.public domain
516 F.Supp.2d 161 (2007) Stephanie HOFER and Douglas Hofer, Plaintiffs, v. The GAP, INC., Expedia, Inc., and Turtle Beach Towers, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 05-40170-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 1, 2007. *162 *163 *164
Electric Mirror, LLC v. Janmar Lighting, Inc.public domain
760 F.Supp.2d 1033 (2010) ELECTRIC MIRROR, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JANMAR LIGHTING, INC., Defendant. No. C10-0976RSL. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. November 8, 2010. *1034 Franciscus L. Diaba, Robert Morris, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY, Mark S. Peloquin, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff
Savedoff v. Access Group, Inc.public domain
524 F.3d 754 (2008) Jill B. SAVEDOFF, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ACCESS GROUP, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3670. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 11, 2008. Decided and Filed: May 2, 2008. *756 ARGUED: Robert Binder, Foley &
Savedoff v. Access Group, Inc.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0170p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - JILL B. SAVEDOFF,