⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Powell v. Carnival Cruise Lines Inc”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001-03-07 · Published · cited 0× · 778 So. 2d 1084; 2001 A.M.C. 1417; 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 2487; 2001 WL 219273
778 So.2d 1084 (2001) Vivian L. BOEHNEN, etc., et al., Appellants, v. CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 3D99-2001. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 7, 2001. Ginsberg & Schwartz, and Todd R. Schwartz; and Allison & Robertson, Miami, for appellants. Mase & Gassenheimer, and Richard D. Lara, and Rachel S. C
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 37 F. Supp. 3d 1254; 2012 WL 11795788; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190429
ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant, Carnival Corporation’s (“Carnivalf’s]”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (“Motion”) [ECF No. 9], filed July 17, 2012. Plaintiff, Jane Doe, “a minor, by and through her mother, natural guardian and best friend, Susan Doe,” filed a Complaint [ECF No. 1] sounding in negligence against Carnival on J
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009-11-25 · Published · cited 6× · 22 So. 3d 567; 2010 A.M.C. 263; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17708
SHEPHERD, J., concurring. I write further in this case only to offer the following additional considerations to balance those suggested by the dissent.2 The issue in these cases is whether the respective trial courts erred by enforcing a forum-selection clause in form contracts issued by Carnival Cruise Lines to four of its fare-paying customers, which requires
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2006-04-06 · Published · cited 10× · 193 S.W.3d 229; 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2751; 2006 WL 870929
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 231 OPINION ON REHEARING Relator Carnival Corporation seeks mandamus relief from a death penalty sanction imposed by the trial court.1 Carnival contends the trial court abused its discretion when, as its first order in this dis
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2006-04-06 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued April 6, 2006 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of T
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999-09-16 · Published · cited 7× · 744 So. 2d 489; 1999 WL 743545
744 So.2d 489 (1999) CARNIVAL CORPORATION, a/k/a Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., Curtis J. Mase, and Mase & Sreenan, P.A., Petitioners, v. Yvonne BEVERLY, Respondent. No. 98-2337. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 16, 1999. Rehearing Denied November 12, 1999. *490 Beverly D. Eisensta
District Court, D. Oregon · 2016-03-14 · Published · cited 16× · 169 F. Supp. 3d 1079; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32275; 2016 WL 1054581
OPINION AND ORDER Michael H. Simon, District Judge. In this lawsuit, adidas America, Inc. and adidas AG (collectively, “Adidas”) allege claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, trademark dilution, and deceptive trade practices against Cougar Sport, Inc. (“Cougar Sport”). Cougar Sport has moved to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, or, alternatively, to tran
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-24-00040-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2016-05-06 · Published · cited 10× · 185 F. Supp. 3d 916; 2016 WL 2621969
RULING JAMES J. BRADY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA These matters are before the Court on two motions. The first is a Motion for *921Preliminary Injunction (Doe. 4) brought by the Plaintiffs.1 The Defendants2 have filed an Opposition (Doc. 22). The second motion
District Court, C.D. California · 2011-01-05 · Published · cited 52× · 782 F. Supp. 2d 911; 2011 WL 1114250
782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille
Washington Supreme Court · 2016-07-21 · Published · cited 44× · 186 Wash. 2d 169; 375 P.3d 1035
González, J. ¶1 The State of Washington sued more than 20 foreign electronics manufacturing companies (including the petitioners) for price fixing. The State claimed the foreign companies conspired to fix prices by selling CRTs (cathode ray tubes) into international streams of commerce intending they be incorporated into products sold at inflated prices in large numbers in Washington State. ¶2 The trial court d
Washington Supreme Court · 2016-07-21 · Published · cited 0×
ThijfPlr.tion was fll~ m~:~1r~1 'l at ·UU t&m on~1y 'tw---t:A~ Supreme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) No. 91391-9 ) v.
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017-03-10 · Published · cited 4× · 320 F.R.D. 271; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60693; 2017 WL 1304302
ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. 93) filed by Plaintiffs, Jason Herman, William Cohen, Joey Kratt, and Christina Lancaster, the Response in opposition thereto (Dkt. 99) filed by Defendant, SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment, Inc. (“SeaWorld”), and the Supplement (Dkt. 115) filed by Plaintiffs;
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-09-18 · Published · cited 3× · 767 F.3d 485; 2014 A.M.C. 2529; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17936; 2014 WL 4672403
JONES, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully disagree with the majority opinion, which assists the United States Chemical Safety Board (“CSB”) in expanding its jurisdiction into novel territory disallowed by Congress. This is the first time, in twenty years after CSB was ordained, that the agency has sought to investigate in connection with an offshore oil spill.1 The majority’
District Court, E.D. New York · 2013-09-04 · Published · cited 26× · 965 F. Supp. 2d 276; 2013 WL 4735698; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126140
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Allied Dynamics Corporation (“plaintiff’ or “Allied”) brings this action against Kennametal, Inc. (“Kennametal”) and Kennametal Stellite, formerly known as Microfusione Stellite S.p.A., (“MFS”) (collectively, “defendants”), alleging causes of action for breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and replevin.
District Court, D. Oregon · 2009-06-08 · Published · cited 3× · 626 F. Supp. 2d 1084; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47935; 2009 WL 1606731
626 F.Supp.2d 1084 (2009) Jeffrey CHUDNER, Plaintiff, v. TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC., a foreign corporation, and TransUnion LLC, a foreign limited liability company, Defendants. Civil Case No. 08-1103-AC. United States District Court, D. Oregon. June 8, 2009. *1085 Steve D. Larson, Joshua L. Ross, Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting &
Hofer v. Gap, Inc.public domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007-10-01 · Published · cited 22× · 516 F. Supp. 2d 161; 2007 WL 2827380
516 F.Supp.2d 161 (2007) Stephanie HOFER and Douglas Hofer, Plaintiffs, v. The GAP, INC., Expedia, Inc., and Turtle Beach Towers, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 05-40170-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 1, 2007. *162 *163 *164
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2010-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 760 F. Supp. 2d 1033; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140227; 2010 WL 5600868
760 F.Supp.2d 1033 (2010) ELECTRIC MIRROR, LLC, Plaintiff, v. JANMAR LIGHTING, INC., Defendant. No. C10-0976RSL. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. November 8, 2010. *1034 Franciscus L. Diaba, Robert Morris, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, NY, Mark S. Peloquin, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-05-02 · Published · cited 240× · 524 F.3d 754; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9505; 2008 WL 1913179
524 F.3d 754 (2008) Jill B. SAVEDOFF, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ACCESS GROUP, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3670. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 11, 2008. Decided and Filed: May 2, 2008. *756 ARGUED: Robert Binder, Foley &
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0170p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - JILL B. SAVEDOFF,