Cases

OPINION AND ORDER S. ARTHUR SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s June 29, 2011 Report and Recommendation (doc. 25), Respondent’s objections (doc. 32), and Petitioner’s objections (doc. 33). Also before the Court are Petitioner’s Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (doc. 34), Petitioner’s Notice of Correction (doc. 35), and Respondent’s Objection

141 Cal.App.2d 428 (1956) 297 P.2d 98 ROY C. KAISER et al., Appellants, v. MARGARET MANSFIELD, Defendant and Respondent; CLARA HOLECHECK, Intervener and Respondent. Docket No. 5340. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District. May 10, 1956. *429 Roy C. Kaiser in pro. per. and Roland T. Williams for App

OAKES, Circuit Judge (dissenting): Appellate fact-finding is one thing. It violates Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), which provides that facts found by the trial court “shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous,” but no constitutional or statutory require*460ments, United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 92 L.Ed. 74

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a judgment order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, Curtin, J., denying without an evidentiary hearing a petition seeking the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. Assigned counsel has done an admirable job briefing and arguing this appeal but, inasmuch as we find no error i

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge: Geraldine Powell, formerly a visiting assistant professor at the Syracuse University School of Architecture, appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Edmund Port, Judge. Judge Port found that, contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the university had legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for terminating M

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge: This appeal raises the question of whether the federal judiciary should, at the instance of victims, compel federal and state officials to investigate and prosecute persons who allegedly have violated certain federal and state criminal statutes. Plaintiffs in the purported class suit, which was commenced in t

568 F.2d 830 Arthur Richard GATES, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Robert J. HENDERSON, Superintendent, Auburn CorrectionalFacility, Respondent-Appellee. No. 361, Docket 76-2065. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Oct. 19, 1976.Decided Jan. 12, 1977.On Rehearing En Banc, Panel Judgment and Decision VacatedAug. 19, 1977.Certiorari Den

* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References; Partnership, 30 Cyc., p. 590, n. 16. This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Suit was instituted against several defendants, who were alleged to be copartners, operating an automobile agency under the name of the Kirkwood Motor Company. On the nineteenth of November, 1921, while plaintiff, a pedestrian, was upon the traveled portion of Washington Avenue, at its interse

Morris, J. Cause No. 21,854 in this court, entitled Moore-Mansfield Construction Co. v. George A. Buskirk et al., was heretofore ordered consolidated with cause No. 21,823, entitled as above. The principal questions for determination are the same in each case. The pleadings show that appellee, Indianapolis, Newcastle and Toledo Railway Company, was incorporated un

651 F.2d 96 Donald J. LAREAU, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.John R. MANSON, Commissioner of Correction, State ofConnecticut, Defendant- Appellant.Jesus CAMPOS, James Scott, Jr., Donald J. Lareau andClarence King, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.John R. MANSON, Commissioner of Correction, State ofConnecticut, and Richard Wezowicz, Warden,Hartford Community Correctional Center,Defendants- Appellants. No

[Cite as State v. Conger, 2024-Ohio-128.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLINTON COUNTY : STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2023-08-017 Appellee, : DECISION

[Cite as Lyrenmann v. Milford Exempted Village Schools, 2025-Ohio-2885.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO MICHAEL LYRENMANN Case No. 2025-00570PQ Requester Special Master Todd Marti v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MILFORD EXEMPTED VILLAGE SCHOOLS Respondent {¶1} This matter is before me for a R.C.2743.75(F) repo

[Cite as State v. Buchman, 2019-Ohio-4276.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. -vs-

[Cite as State v. Sheldon, 2016-Ohio-6984.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BROWN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. CA2016-04-010 Plaintiff-Appellee, : OPINION

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Joseph Piesciuk, appeals a judgment of the Butler County Common Pleas Court sentencing him to 21 years in prison and ordering him to pay restitution to various individuals in the amount of $132,734. Piesciuk asserts that the trial court erred in his original trial, that it failed to rule on his pre-sentence motions, that the restitution order was not supported by suffici

[Cite as State ex rel. Ware v. Stone, 2023-Ohio-3865.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO EX REL., KIMANI : JUDGES: E. WARE #A470743, : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Relator : Hon. Cr

[Cite as State ex rel. Ware v. Stone, 2023-Ohio-3284.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO EX REL., KIMANI : JUDGES: E. WARE #A470743, : : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Relator : Hon. Cr

MANSFIELD, Justice. This case requires us to answer the following question: Does a person commit theft by taking within the meaning of Iowa Code section 714.1(1) (2013) when the person obtains property or services by delivering a phony check or money order? Here, the defendant removed money from her bank account after depositing several counterfeit checks and money orders. La

OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the July 16, 2014 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 45). The Report recommends granting (1) the Motion to Dismiss of Hamilton County and the unnamed agents of the Hamilton County Regional Narcotics Unit and Organized Crime Division (“County Defendants”) (Doc. 20); (2) the Motion to Di

[Cite as Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ., 2024-Ohio-5964.] IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO ALEX SCHAFFER Case No. 2024-00461PQ Requester Special Master Todd Marti v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY Respondent {¶1} This case is before me for a R.C. 2743.75(F) report and reco