⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Power Force Apparel, LLC”

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017-08-24 · Published · cited 9× · 577 B.R. 54
MEMORANDUM DECISION Robert E. Grossman, United States Bankruptcy Judge 1. Introduction Anthony Labrosciano (the “Plaintiff’), the Chapter 11 Responsible Person of the estate of Signature Apparel Group LLC (the “Debtor”), appointed pursuant to a confirmed liquidation plan, commenced this adversary proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code, New York and Delaware law asserting a variety of claims aris
District Court, C.D. California · 2012-01-13 · Published · cited 26× · 855 F. Supp. 2d 1043; 2012 WL 1131684; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47026
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. This is a consolidated putative securities class action against defendants American Apparel, Inc., Dov Charney, Adrian Kowalewski, and Lion Capital, Inc. Plaintiffs’ primary allegation is that during the class period, defendants misled the public about its hiring of workers employed in American Apparel’s Los Angeles factory.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2012-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 108 Fed. Cl. 11; 2012 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1602; 2012 WL 6597339
Post-Award Bid Protest; Motion to Dismiss; Contract Modification OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT The United States Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Defense Supply Center Philadelphia, issued Solicitation SPM1C1-08-R-0153 (the solicitation) for “Coats, All Weather, Various, Mens and Womens” for the United States Marine Corps, Army, and Navy on September 10, 2009. The sol
District Court, S.D. New York · 2009-07-30 · Published · cited 6× · 644 F. Supp. 2d 375; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68338; 2009 WL 2355784
644 F.Supp.2d 375 (2009) Donna MUHLEISEN, Plaintiff, v. WEAR ME APPAREL LLC, Defendant. No. 07 Civ. 8748(NRB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 30, 2009. *377 Paul R. Castronovo, Bedminster, NJ, for Plaintiff. Michael Peter Pappas, Sara Danielle Sheinkin, Littler Mendelson, P.C., New York, NY, for Defendan
Illinois Supreme Court · 2008-02-07 · Published · cited 85× · 882 N.E.2d 1011; 227 Ill. 2d 381; 36 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1335; 317 Ill. Dec. 855; 2008 Ill. LEXIS 277
882 N.E.2d 1011 (2008) 227 Ill.2d 381 IMPERIAL APPAREL, LTD., et al., Appellees, v. COSMO'S DESIGNER DIRECT, INC., et al., Appellants. No. 103331. Supreme Court of Illinois. February 7, 2008. *1014 James H. Wolf, James M. Wolf, of Wolf & Tennant, Chicago, for appellant Cosmo's Designer Direct, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015-05-06 · Published · cited 13× · 785 F.3d 1285; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 7508; 61 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 2; 2015 WL 2081575
OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge: This case presents an unresolved issue of bankruptcy law. The question is whether a corporate insider who personally guaranteed his corporation’s loan is absolved of any preference liability to which he might otherwise have been subjected, where he had previously waived his indemnification rights against the corporation, he had a bona fide basis for doing so, and he took
District Court, D. Utah · 2019-03-12 · Published · cited 1× · 374 F. Supp. 3d 1124
ROBERT J. SHELBY, United States Chief District Judge Plaintiff Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment (UPHE) brought this citizen enforcement action under the Clean Air Act (CAA). UPHE claims Defendants-three businesses and four individuals-violated the CAA and federally-enforceable Utah State Implementation Plan Regulations relating to the installation, removal, operation, and sale of emission control devices on diesel vehicles.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2008-06-05 · Published · cited 9× · 591 F. Supp. 2d 306; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44599; 2008 WL 2329533
(2008) JA APPAREL CORP., Plaintiff, v. Joseph ABBOUD, Houndstooth Corp., and Herringbone Creative Services, Inc., Defendants. Joseph Abboud, Houndstooth Corp., and Herringbone Creative Services, Inc., Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, v. JA Apparel Corp. and Martin Staff, Counterclaim-Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 7787 (THK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 5, 20
Oregon Supreme Court · 2024-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
No. 11 May 2, 2024 225 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. Thomas BROWN, Respondent on Review, and Maria Del Carmen Espindola GOMEZ, Respondent on Review. (CC 15CV23066) (CA A169544) (SC S070082)
Oregon Supreme Court · 2024-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
No. 11 May 2, 2024 225 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. Thomas BROWN, Respondent on Review, and Maria Del Carmen Espindola GOMEZ, Respondent on Review. (CC 15CV23066) (CA A169544) (SC S070082)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-06-06 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 03073
Matter of 195 B Owner LLC v Anthropologie, Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 03073) Matter of 195 B Owner LLC v Anthropologie, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 03073 Decided on June 06, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Repo
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002-09-06 · Published · cited 17× · 218 F. Supp. 2d 974; 48 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 960; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16726; 2002 WL 31015263
218 F.Supp.2d 974 (2002) FABRICA DE TEJIDOS IMPERIAL, S.A., Plaintiff, v. BRANDON APPAREL GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 00 C 7033. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 6, 2002. Neal H. Levin, Neal H. Levin & Associates, P.C., Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. *975 Robert P. Cummins,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008-12-15 · Published · cited 0×
REVISED DECEMBER 15, 2008 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED November 25, 2008 No. 07-30580 Charles R. Fulbruge III
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-06-16 · Published · cited 3× · 112 F. Supp. 3d 69; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77779; 2015 WL 3751658
OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge. This lawsuit arises from a dispute ’ between a licensor of a patented camouflage pattern and its former licensee. The pleadings include the licensor’s claims for breach of contract and counterclaims seeking a declaration that-plaintiffs’ patents in the camouflage pattern are invalid. This Opinion addresses two pending motions.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-12-19 · Published · cited 8× · 124 F.4th 441
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2850 CHARLES CURRY, JR., doing business as GET DIESEL NUTRITION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REVOLUTION LABORATORIES, LLC, et al., Defendant-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from t
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2017-03-15 · Published · cited 23× · 242 F. Supp. 3d 789; 2017 WL 1026025; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37266
OPINION & ORDER JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge After more than 25 years as the founder and president of plaintiff Kuryakyn Holdings, LLC, a motorcycle aftermarket parts design company, defendant Thomas Rudd resigned. Rather than simply retiring, Rudd helped his son start a competing motorcycle aftermarket parts company, defendant Ciro, LLC, and poach Kuryak-yn’s three main designers, defendants Dar
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023-02-21 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021-12-28 · Published · cited 27× · 21 F.4th 1229
Appellate Case: 20-4043 Document: 010110624784 Date Filed: 12/28/2021 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 28, 2021
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2018-08-30 · Published · cited 47× · 564 S.W.3d 167
Opinion issued August 30, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00501-CV ——————————— FORTITUDE ENERGY, LLC, Appellant/Cross-Appellee V. SOONER PIPE LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appel
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PAUL WITMER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0807-MTZ ) ARMISTICE CAPITAL, LLC, ) ARMISTICE CAPITAL MASTER FUND ) LTD., STEVEN BOYD, JOSHUA ) DISBROW, GARY CANTRELL, JOHN ) DONOFRIO, JR., CARL DOCKERY,