Cases

789 F.Supp.2d 1090 (2011) Peggy JONES, LaRonda Blakely, Marsha Corwin, Janet Engelken, Robin Hartkopp, Pamm Joyner-Azbill, Judy Klimesh, Shirley Long, Amber Pletsch, Kathleen Price, William Steven, Verna Sunnes, and Saundra West, Plaintiffs, v. DOLGENCORP, INC., and Dollar General Partners, Defendants. No. C 10-3020-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division.

ED CARNES, Chief Judge: After we have remanded a case with specific instructions,, attorneys rarely attempt to have the district court defy our mandate. And even if they try it, a district court is seldom misled into that kind of error by them.'This is one'of those rare cases where the attorneys representing one side successfully urged the district court to

MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge. Plaintiff, Michael Kreiner (“Kreiner”), brings this action against defendant, Dolgencorp, Inc.1 (“Dolgencorp” or “Dollar General”), claiming a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1) for failure to pay overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of forty hours a week. Dolgencorp ave

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LOUIS GUIROLA, JR., District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT are the Motion for Summary Judgment [20] and the Motion to Strike [35] filed by the defendant, Dolgencorp, Inc. (hereinafter “Dollar General”). Dollar General argues that there is no genuine issue of material fact that the plaintiff, Linda Noble, qualified for t

ORDER GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, CHIEF JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Before the court is the Motion to Dismiss of defendant Dolgencorp, LLC (“Dollar General”) [Dkt. # 12]. Plaintiff Will Sisemore, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“Sisemore”), asserts claims for violation of the Oklahoma Consumer Protection Act (“OCPA”), breach of an implied warranty of merchantability, breac

513 F.Supp.2d 1215 (2007) Penny ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. DOLGENCORP, INC., et al., Defendants. Beryl Dauzat, Plaintiff, v. Dolgencorp, Inc., et al., Defendants. Deborah Francis, Plaintiff, v. Dolgencorp, Inc., et al., Defendants. Regina Franklin, Plaintiff, v. Dolgencorp, Inc., et al., Defendants. Michael Hadaway, Plaintiff, v. Dolgencorp, Inc., et al., Defendants. Cathy Thomas, Plaintiff, v.

W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge. This case is before the court on two motions for summary judgment (DE # # 21, 28)1 filed by defendant Dolgencorp, Inc. (“Dollar General”). Also before the court are various motions to seal (DE #24, 27, 31, 37), Dollar General’s motion to strike (DE # 46), and plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file notice of supplemental authorities in response to defendant’s mo

JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge: Dolgencorp, Inc. and Dollar General Corp. (collectively “Dolgencorp”) brought an action in the district court seeking to enjoin John Doe, a member of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, and other *411defendants (collectively “the tribal defendants”) from adjudicating tort claims against Dolgencorp in the Choctaw tribal court.

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: When a Winn-Dixie supermarket signs on to anchor a shopping center, its lease often contains a restrictive covenant sharply limiting grocery sales by other tenants. In this complex lawsuit, Winn-Dixie claimed that, since 2005, it suffered more than $90 million in lost profits because Defendants Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Big Lots violated, and contin

Case: 12-14527 Date Filed: 03/05/2014 Page: 1 of 72 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ Nos. 12-14527; 12-14742; 12-14825 ________________________ D.C. Docket Nos. 9:11-cv-80601-DMM, 9:11-cv-80638-DMM WINN-DIXIE

13 So.3d 888 (2008) Ex parte DOLGENCORP, INC. (In re Dolgencorp, Inc. v. Barbara Ann Gibson). 1060428. Supreme Court of Alabama. October 31, 2008. *890 Robert S. Lamar, Jr., and Rick D. Norris, Jr., of Lamar, Miller, Norris, Haggard & Christie, P.C., Birmingham, for petitioner. Joseph C. McCorquodale of McCorquodale &

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.' Before the Court is Defendant Dolgen-corp, LLC’s (“Dollar General”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #21). This case arises out of Plaintiff Kimberly Thomas’s (“Thomas”) 'allegations that Dollar General discriminated against her on thq basis of her disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), on the bas

OPINION CEDARBAUM, District Judge. Chrisha Creations, Ltd. sues Dolgencorp., Inc., Dollar General Corp., and Family Dollar Stores, Inc. for infringing U.S. Patents Nos. 7,302,769 (“the '769 patent”) and 7,216,446 (“the '446 Patent”). Because the parties do not agree on the correct construction of certain terms used in the claims of the '769 patent, I held a hearing in accordance with Markma

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case comes before the court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enforce the Settlement Agreement and, in the Alternative, for a Declaratory Judgment. (Doc. 462). The motion actually seeks relief for plaintiffs’ counsel, as to the following respondents who were not parties to

JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge: The court previously issued its opinion in this case on October 3, 2013. Dolgencorp, Inc. v. Miss. Band of Choctaw Indians, 732 F.3d 409 (5th Cir.2013). We hereby withdraw the previous opinion and substitute the following. Dolgencorp, Inc. and Dollar General Corp. (collectively “Dolgencorp”) brought an action in the district court seeking to enjoin John Doe, a me

964 So.2d 261 (2007) WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. DOLGENCORP, INC., a Kentucky corporation, and Crest Haven, L.L.C., a foreign limited liability company, Appellees. No. 4D06-1585. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 19, 2007. *262 Thomas E. Warner, Dean A. Morande, and

134 S.W.3d 813 (2004) DOLGENCORP, INC. d/b/a Dollar General, Appellant, v. Donald ZATORSKI, Respondent pro se, Division of Employment Security, Respondent. No. WD 62645. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. May 28, 2004. *814 Rachel Heath Baker, Kansas City, for appellant. Donald Zatorski, Fulton, respondent pro se

ORDER R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge. Plaintiff Stacey Langley (“Plaintiff’) filed the above action against her former employer, Dollar General Stores (“Defendant”), alleging gender discrimination, *808quid pro quo sexual harassment, sexually hostile work environment, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Tit

Faye Hall sued Dolgencorp, Inc. ("Dolgencorp"), which owns and operates Dollar General Store discount stores, alleging negligence and wantonness after the contents of a bottle of liquid drain cleaner spilled onto her face from a shelf in the Dollar General Store in Marion. At trial, at the close of Hall's case-in-chief, Dolgencorp filed a motion for a judgment as a matter of law ("JML") as to Hall's negligence and wantonness claims. The trial court granted Dolgencorp's motion as to th

SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Linda Atkins, once a sales associate at Dollar General, is a type II diabetic who occasionally suffers from low blood sugar. She must respond to these episodes by quickly consuming glucose to avoid the risk of seizing or passing out. When she asked her manager if she could keep orange juice at her register in case of an emergency, the manager refused. Atkins' fear