Cases

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER. Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge FRIEDMAN. RADER, Circuit Judge. Elizabeth A. Price appeals the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) denying her motion for attorney fees. Social Sec. Admin. v. Price, 94 M.S.P.R. 337 (M.S.P.B. 2003) (Final Decision ). Because the Board properly determined that an award o

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles A. Fields appeals the district court’s orders affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny Fields a period of disability and disability insurance benefits and denying Fields’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 motion. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if it is suppo

BARRON, Circuit Judge. The Social Security Administration (“SSA”) terminated the disability benefits that Daniel Justiniano and Francisco Men-éndez—the plaintiffs-appellants—had been receiving. 1 The SSA did so based on a concern that the medical evidence that supported Justiniano’s and Menéndez’s ap

*1044ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Ralph R. Erickson, District Judge United States District Court Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has received a Report and' Recommendation from the Honorable Alice R. Senechal, United States Magistrate Judge.1 The Report and Recommendation recommends that the defendant

OPINION AND ORDER GERSHON, District Judge: Plaintiff Mary Price brings this action seeking court review of the July 2, 2009 final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), by which her application for Supplemental Security Income benefits, made on behalf of her infant grandson, was denied. The Commissioner now moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Price, who appeals from the decision of the district court upholding the Social Security Administration’s 2013 denial of his claim for Supplemental Security Income (benefits for low-income people who are aged, blind or disabled, Browning v. Col-vin, 766 F.3d 702, 703 (7th Cir.2014)), is an almost illiterate, mentally retarded (“intellec

MEMORANDUM *** Sherry Price appeals the district court’s affirmance of the ALJ’s determination that she is ineligible for Supplemental Security Income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. We affirm. Price argues that the ALJ improperly discounted the opinion of her treating physician. A treating physician’s opinion is not “conclusive as to either a physical condition or

MEMORANDUM *** Sherry Price appeals the district court’s affirmance of the ALJ’s determination that she is ineligible for Supplemental Security Income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. We affirm. Price argues that the ALJ improperly discounted the opinion of her treating physician. A treating physician’s opinion is not “conclusive as to either a physical condition or

RILEY, Circuit Judge. Martha Hillier (Hillier) appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits (SSDI) and supplemental security income (SSI) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434, 1381-1383f. We affirm.

WU, District Judge, concurring: I am in agreement with the holdings and reasoning in the Discussion — Part II (“The Residual Functional Capacity Determination”) of the Opinion. Likewise, I concur with the result reached in the Discussion— Part I (“The ALJ’s Failure to Follow SSR 82-41”), ie., that the decision below should be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. How

600 F.Supp.2d 740 (2009) William S. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:08CV17. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia. February 27, 2009. *741 Joyce H. Morton, Montie Vannostrand, Vannostrand & Morton, PLLC, Webster Springs, WV, for Plaintiff. <

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) KISHA SIMON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2033 (RBW) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY,

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WOODCOCK, District Judge. The Plaintiff, Peter Clifford, a former Social Security Administration (SSA) employee, is a fifty-five year old man with a physical disability who applied for, but was not selected for, three positions within the SSA. He has filed suit, claiming the SSA’s actions were based on his disability and age in violation of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL GREENWALD, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-797 (LLA) v. XAVIER BECERRA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Michael Greenwald’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 63, and Defendan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) DENISE PRICE, individually and as the ) personal representative and administrator ) of the Estate of Jeffrey Price, Jr., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs Natalie A. Hekmat and Michael Hekmat sued defendants JetBlue Airways Corporation (“JetBlue”) and the United States Transportation Security Administration (the “TSA”), asserting bailment, negligence, failure to supervise, and breach of contract claims after approximately $95,000 in jewelry went missing from their checked lug

OPINION BÜMB, United States District Judge:,, This matter comes before the Court on an appeal from„a final administrative-decision by the Commissioner of Social Security which denied benefits to Plaintiff Charles Schemelia (“Plaintiff’). (Adminis*535trative Record (“AR”) 25-26). On June 5, 2017, this Court conducted oral argument. For the reasons s

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR (PE 17) AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DE 20) Anthony P. Patti, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Kristen Jo Gross, Jr., brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) for review of a final decision of *82

OPINION RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Following the successful reversal of the Social Security Administration’s denial of his Social Security benefits, Bobby ■ J. Coursey sought attorney fees under the Equal Access-to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Coursey requested an hourly rate of $185.18, which exceeds the EAJA’s presumptive statutory c

SMITH, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This civilian pay case is before the court on petitioner’s appeal for review of an order of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). The question to be decided is *152what standard of review should have been applied by the MSPB at the particular time it considered petitioner’s case.