⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Prime Trust, LLC”

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2016-08-09 · Published · cited 4× · 555 B.R. 70
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Peter G. Cary, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court I. Introduction. This adversary proceeding emerges from the confirmed chapter 11 plan of the jointly administered cases of six debtors (the “Debtors”): Prime Tanning Company, *73Inc. (“Prime Delaware”), Irving Tanning Company (“Irvin
District Court, D. Maine · 2018-11-01 · Published · cited 21× · 354 F. Supp. 3d 957
Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Court Prime Therapeutics LLC ("Prime") seeks a preliminary injunction forbidding a former employee, Ashley D. Beatty ("Beatty"), from performing some (but not all) activities in a new job she began recently with Maxor National Pharmacy Services, LLC ("Maxor"). Prime alleges that, if not limited by an injunction, Beatty will inevitably disclose Prime's confidential business information to Maxor. Accordi
Delaware Court of Common Pleas · 2023-12-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY CKS PRIME INVESTMENTS, LLC Plaintiff, V. LISA CHAMBERLAND ) ) ) ) C.A. No. CPU6-22-000345 ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ORDER Submitted: September 5, 2023 Decided: December 6, 2023 Upon Consideration of the Commissioner’s Findings of Fact and Recommendation - ADOPTED On this 6" day of December 2023, having considered the Commissioner’s Findings of Fact and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) recommending the Court enter j
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1946 Doc: 52 Filed: 05/06/2024 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1793 ZION WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff − Appellee, v. PRIME SPORTS MARKETING, LLC; GINA FORD,
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-06-21 · Published · cited 2× · 221 So. 3d 671; 2017 WL 2665067; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8978
May, J. Whether Florida can exercise personal jurisdiction over an Oklahoma lender, whose subject loan is secured by homestead property in Florida is the question we must decide. A creditor of the Florida resident argues the trial court erred in determining that Florida did not have personal jurisdiction over the Oklahoma lender. We agree and reverse. The creditor, Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, obtained a
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-05-06 · Published · cited 3× · 101 F.4th 302
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1793 Doc: 61 Filed: 05/06/2024 Pg: 1 of 23 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1793 ZION WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff − Appellee, v. PRIME SPORTS MARKETING, LLC; GINA FORD,
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CYGNUS OPPORTUNITY FUND, LLC, ) CYGNUS PROPERTY FUND V, LLC, ) CYGNUS PROPERTY FUND IV, LLC, ) CHAND KARAMCHANDANI, SHAMI ) KARAMCHANDANI, ALEX ) KEOLEIAN, K-BAR HOLDINGS, LLC, ) and SHIKAR PARTAB ) ) Plaintiffs, )
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 494 B.R. 816; 2013 WL 2480883; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 2361
OPINION JOHN J. THOMAS, Bankruptcy Judge. The liquidating trustee under a confirmed bankruptcy plan has initiated a multi-count litigation against a number of defendants in the hope of creating a fund for the beneficiaries of the plan. While the litigation has moved slowly through a number of preliminary skirmishes, I thought best to articulate, after notice, the scope of the bankruptcy court’s
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020-02-24 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2725 SHARIF PHARMACY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRIME THERAPEUTICS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-11-14 · Published · cited 0× · 122 A.D.3d 1114; 998 N.Y.S.2d 469
Rose, J. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Demarest, J.), entered June 21, 2013 in Franklin County, upon a decision of the court in favor of certain defendants, and (2) from an amended order and amended judgment of said court, entered September 9, 2013 in Franklin County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for, among other things, a deficiency judgment against certain defendants. Defendant UICC Hold
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2013-09-30 · Published · cited 1× · 974 F. Supp. 2d 1333; 2013 WL 5423619; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140099
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant Prime Insurance Company’s (“Defendant” or “Prime”) Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, for Forum Non Conveniens (Doc. # 6) and Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. # 12). For the reasons set forth below, the Court *1335
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020-02-24 · Published · cited 17× · 950 F.3d 911
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2725 SHARIF PHARMACY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRIME THERAPEUTICS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Nevada Supreme Court · 2012-10-25 · Published · cited 42× · 128 Nev. 556; 289 P.3d 1199; 128 Nev. Adv. Rep. 53; 2012 Nev. LEXIS 97; 2012 WL 5285396
*568OPINION By the Court, Cherry, C.J.: The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida has certified three questions to this court relating to the viability of equitable subrogation and the enforceability of contractual subordination against mechanic’s lien claimants under Nevada’s mechanic’s and materialman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-11-14 · Published · cited 0× · 122 A.D.3d 1114; 998 N.Y.S.2d 469
Rose, J. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Demarest, J.), entered June 21, 2013 in Franklin County, upon a decision of the court in favor of certain defendants, and (2) from an amended order and amended judgment of said court, entered September 9, 2013 in Franklin County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for, among other things, a deficiency judgment against certain defendants. Defendant UICC Hold
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023-02-21 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2025-03-13 · Published · cited 0× · 566 P.3d 1267; 2025 UT App 38
2025 UT App 38 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. KEVIN DIXON AND WBTL, LLC, Appellees, MICHELLE DYER, Intervenor and Appellant. Opinion No. 20230932-CA Filed March 13, 2025
Nevada Supreme Court · 2011-12-29 · Published · cited 13× · 127 Nev. 941; 267 P.3d 786; 127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 85; 2011 Nev. LEXIS 119; 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 85
*953OPINION By the Court, Hardesty, J.: In this opinion, we address an important policy question concerning the proper scope of the record before this court and the extent to which this court may determine facts, if at all, when it considers a certified question from a federal court. The present matter arises in a pending certification
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013-08-29 · Published · cited 1× · 213 Md. App. 122; 73 A.3d 361; 2013 WL 4603159; 2013 Md. App. LEXIS 92
GRAEFF, J. This case arises from a real estate transaction between Prime Venturers, appellant, and David and Cheryl Leupens (the “Leupens”), in which Prime Venturers agreed to convey approximately three acres of land, located at 6704 Ridge Road *125in Sykesville (the “Property”), to the Leupens, and the Leupens agreed to reconvey to Prime Venturers 1.68 acres when Pri
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2024-12-05 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 24-1132 Filed: November 27, 2024 Re-issued: December 5, 2024 1 ________________________________________ ) PRIME PHYSICIANS, PLLC, ) ) Plaintiff, )
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014-11-24 · Published · cited 0× · 2014 DNH 245
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Thomas Moulton v. Civil No. 14-cv-265-JD Opinion No. 2014 DNH 245 David Bane and Prime Choice Enterprises, LLC v. Thomas Moulton, Eric Emery, and King’s Highway Realty Trust, LTD Partnership O R D E R The claims in this case arise from the failure of The Meat House, a spec