Cases

USCA11 Case: 21-13340 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 1 of 70 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals Hor the Eleventh Circuit No. 21-13340 BIDI VAPOR LLC, Petitioner, versus U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondents. USCA11 Case: 21-13340 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 2 of 70 2 Opinion of the Court 21-13340 Petitions for Review of a Decision of the Food and Dr

Insight Health Corp. v. Marquis Diagnostic Imaging of N.C., LLC, 2017 NCBC 14. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION BUNCOMBE COUNTY 14 CVS 1783 INSIGHT HEALTH CORP. d/b/a INSIGHT IMAGING, Plaintiff, ORDER AND OPINION ON v.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 12-204C (Filed: October 27, 2015) ************************** * * Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. DMS IMAGING, INC., * § 7100 et seq; Breach of * Contract; Risk of Loss Clause; Plaintiff, *

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAYLOR, District Judge. This is a dispute alleging trade-dress infringement and unfair competition brought by a company that sells sports helmets. Plaintiff Bern Unlimited, Inc., has brought suit against six other makers of sports helmets. Bern contends that its helmets have a unique design, featuring a small visor and rounded shape. It further

LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge Plaintiff Muench Photography, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed this action for breach of *84contract and copyright infringement against Defendants McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC and McGraw-Hill School Education Holdings, LLC ("Defendants" or "McGraw-Hill"). The parties signed an agreement

ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:36 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7100 et seq; Breach of Contract; Risk of Loss Clause; Specific Performance; Prompt Payment Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3902(a); Constructive Termination; Frustration of Purpose Doctrine; Damages; Causation; Foreseeability; Reasonable Certainty; Interest; Attorney’s Fees. OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAMS, Judge.

11/21/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 2, 2022 Session FAMILY TRUST SERVICES LLC ET AL. v. GREEN WISE HOMES LLC ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 15-0780-BC Anne C. Martin, Chancellor _

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: Google Play Store Antitrust No. 24-6256 Litigation D.C. Nos. ______________________________ 3:21-md-02981-JD _ 3:20-cv-05671-JD EPIC GAMES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, OPINION Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GOOGLE LLC; GOOGL

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARY DOE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. S20C-05-005 RHR ) MASSAGE ENVY FRANCHISING, LLC; ) DDW ENTERPRISES, LLC; RED ) ENTERPRISES, INC. D/B/A MASSAGE ) ENVY—REHOBOTH BEACH AND ) D/B/A MASSAGE ENVY—LEWES; and ) RICHARD DULEY, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit

Slip Op. No. 25-75 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE COZY COMFORT COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, Before: Stephen Alexander Vaden, Judge v. Court No. 1:22-cv-00173 (SAV) UNITED STATES, Defendant. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW [Resolving disputed f

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit

Addison Whitney, LLC v. Cashion, 2020 NCBC 48. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 17 CVS 1956 ADDISON WHITNEY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON BRANNON CASHION; VINCENT PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR BUDD; RANDALL SCOTT; CON

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge. This is an action alleging copyright infringement as well as breach of contract, unjust enrichment, unfair competition, and unfair and deceptive trade practices under North Carolina law. Several motions are before the court. Five Defendants— R.T.G. Furniture Corp., Rooms to Go Tennessee Corp., Rooms to Go Louisiana Corp., Rooms to G

FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON OCTOBER 30, 2025 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON OCTOBER 30, 2025 SARAH R. PENDLETON

Filed: 8/13/21 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN ROSALINDA ZUNIGA, B297023 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC529776) v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Filed 8/12/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN ROSALINDA ZUNIGA, B297023 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC529776) v. ALEXANDRIA CARE CENTER, LLC, et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior

The trial court entered a judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that neither the parents nor T were patients of defendants and, therefore, the court reasoned, defendants owed no obligation of professional care toward them. The Court of Appeals reversed that judgment as to the parents but affirmed as to T. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, and we reverse in part and affirm in par