Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: In 2013, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) issued a final rule formalizing its recognition that liability under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) may arise from a facially neutral practice that has discriminatory effects on certain groups of people, regardless of whether discriminatory intent exist

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–1627 Filed June 12, 2015 IOWA INSURANCE INSTITUTE, IOWA DEFENSE COUNSEL ASSOCIATION, IOWA SELF-INSURERS’ ASSOCIATION, PROPERTY CASUALTY INSURERS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, and IOWA ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, Appellants, vs. CORE GROUP OF THE IOWA ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE; CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Workers’ Com

MANSFIELD, Justice. In this case we are asked to determine whether the, workers’ compensation commissioner correctly interpreted Iowa Code section 85.27(2) as overriding the work product immunity and therefore requiring the disclosure of surveillance video of any claimant seeking workers’ compensation benefits before the claimant is deposed. For the reasons set forth herein, we conclude that section 85.27(2) is limited to heal

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. In this diversity-based declaratory judgment action, Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (Travelers), a Connecticut corporation, and its insured, Mr. Greg Paine, a Minnesota resident, seek a determination of whether General Casualty Insurance Companies, doing business as Regent Insurance Company (Regent), a Wisconsin Corporation, had a duty to defend Mr. Paine in a negligence suit brought aga

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT DEIN, U.S.M.J. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiffs, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) and The Commerce Insurance Company (“Commerce”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Carriers”), have brought this action against two chiropractic entities, their present and former princip

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge As the District of Columbia Court of Appeals recently noted, “[i]t is fundamental that in a business transaction between two sophisticated entities involving substantial sums ... parties are bound by what they sign.” Washington Inv. Partners of Delaware, LLC v. Sec

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2020 Decided January 19, 2021 No. 19-1140 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, RESPONDENTS AEP GENERATING COMPANY, ET AL.,

Godin v. Corrections Corp. of America et al., No. 364-10-16 Frcv (Harris, J., Aug. 25, 2017). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 13-966 (RJL) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF HOUSING AND URBAN ) DEVELOPMENT, et al., ) ) ) Defendants, MEMORANDUM OPINION September 2023) [Dkt. ## 60, 64] The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has promulgated a Rule that creates a legal framework for establishing disparate-impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. That Disp

Spina, J. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, in the context of a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment filed by Philip Morris USA, Inc. (Philip Morris), has certified the following questions to this court, pursuant to S.J.C. Rule 1:03, as appearing in 382 Mass. 700 (1981)2: “1. Does the plaintiffs’ suit for medical monitoring

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [268] AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [297] DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge. Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Pls. Mot.”) (Dkt. 268) and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (“Defs. Mo

150 F.Supp.2d 249 (2001) Andrea C. DOW, Plaintiff, v. George E. DONOVAN, et al., As partners of Lyne, Woodworth and Evarts, LLP, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 00-11655-REK. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 19, 2001. *250 *251 *252 Jody L. Newm

JUSTICE SPOMER delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion. Justice Stewart concurred in the judgment and opinion. Justice Donovan specially concurred, with opinion. OPINION The defendants, Safeco Insurance Company of America and Safeco Insurance Comp

(2008) NEHEMIAH CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Alphonso JACKSON, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. S-07-2056 LKK/DAD. United States District Court, E.D. California. March 3, 2008. ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff Nehemiah Corporation of America ("Nehemiah") has brought this action against the Department of

PATRICIA RIVET MURRAY, Judge. I,The plaintiff, Yolanda Gurley, appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding her $45,500.00 in general damages plus $70,024.75 in past medical expenses against defendant Theodore Mace and his insurer. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW On March 29, 2003, Yolanda Gurley’s vehicle, which was traveling westbound on Desaix Boulev

985 So.2d 299 (2008) Yolanda GURLEY v. ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Theodore Mace, Jea Mace, Elizabeth Mace and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. No. 2007-CA-1477. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. May 14, 2008. *300 Christopher M. Rodriguez, Christopher M. Rodriguez, APLG, Michael I. Rodrigue

OPINION Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice This appeal arises out of a dispute among companies involved in making or receiving structured-settlement payments. The trial court disposed of all claims by granting various summary-judgment motions, except for the defendants’ request for attorney’s fees. Following jury findings as to the amount of reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees, the trial court rendere

300 F.Supp.2d 119 (2004) Paul JUNG, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.02-0873 PLF. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 11, 2004. *120 *121 *122

Branch, Judge. Charles Rothman was injured in an automobile accident involving a vehicle driven by Due Nyguen. The truck driven by Rothman at *671 the time of the accident belonged to his employer, Allgood Services of Georgia. Rothman subsequently filed suit against Nyguen, seeking to recover medica

220 S.W.3d 670 (2005) Andrew Baxter LOW, Gary L. Low and Merrily Low, Appellants, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, International Insurance Company, Industrial Indemnity Company, Lexington Insurance Company (AIG), and Niagara Fire Insurance Company, Appellees. No. CA 05-181. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 15, 2005. *672