Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “RAYMOND E SHEARER”
Lauren Shearer v. Ronald Raymond & a.public domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by e-mail at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet
Shearer v. Hulickpublic domain
JUSTICE STOUDER delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, Donald R. Hulick, sheriff of Knox County, charged plaintiff, Mark J. Shearer, then a captain with the sheriff’s department, with engaging in political activity prohibited by article VI, paragraph B.14, of the rules, regulations, and procedures of the Knox County, Illinois, merit commission. At
Buchanan, Raymond Jr.public domain
PD-0063-15 PD-0063-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 1/15/2015 10:28:43 PM Accepted 1/21/2015 3:44:09 PM TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEX
Buchanan, Raymond Jr.public domain
PD-0063-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/17/2015 11:39:57 PM Accepted 2/19/2015 10:40:05 AM
Shearer v. DeShonpublic domain
240 S.C. 472 (1962) 126 S.E.2d 514 Jimmie H. SHEARER, as Administrator of the Estate of Glenda Shearer, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raymond DeSHON and Charlotte Faye DeShon, Defendants-Appellants, and William M. Lyle, Defendant-Respondent. 17941 Supreme Court of South Carolina. July 9, 1962. *473 Messrs. H
Shearer v. Allegheny Land & Mineral Co.public domain
Raymond, Judge, dissenting: I respectfully but emphatically dissent from the decision of the majority which affirms the judgment of the circuit court and holds the lease between the plaintiff and the defendant to be invalid and that the plaintiff is not entitled to the royalty which she seeks to recover and which is expressly provided by the lease. The holding of the majority is, I think, clearly erroneous and m
Lambert v. Shearerpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 269 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 270 Defendant, Earnest Shearer, D.O., appeals from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, where a jury assessed $2.4 million in damag
531 F.2d 408 The QUECHAN TRIBE OF INDIANS, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Raymond ROWE, Sheriff of Imperial County, et al.,Defendants-Appellants. No. 72--3199. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Feb. 2, 1976. James H. Harmon, County Counsel (argued), El Centro, Cal., for defendants-appellants. <
Johnson v. Michigan Department of Treasurypublic domain
120 F.Supp.2d 619 (1999) James E. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Douglas B. Roberts, Department of Natural Resources, K.L. Cool, Wayne County Treasurer Raymond J. Wojtowicz and Tommy A. Dixon, Jr., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 98-CV-72154DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. May 25, 1999. Sean C. Shearer, Detroit, MI,
Lowe v. Shearerpublic domain
MCDONALD, PARKER LEE, Associate Judge. The action below was brought by plaintiff, William K. Shearer against defendants, Mary Ann Lowe and Robert N. Lowe and defendants Roberta K. Ingram and Raymond J. Ingram for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff, William K. Shearer. Defendant Mary Ann Lowe was driving a 1963 Buick Special automobile owned by Robert N. Lowe when she was involved in an automobile collision with a 1962 Old
Shearer v. Superior Courtpublic domain
70 Cal.App.3d 424 (1977) 138 Cal. Rptr. 824 FREDERICK H. SHEARER et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; THUNDERVOLT CORPORATION, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. 50030. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. June 6, 1977. *425 COUNSEL
Petkus v. St. Charles Savings & Loan Ass'npublic domain
182 Ill. App.3d 327 (1989) 538 N.E.2d 766 JOHN PETKUS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ST. CHARLES SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 2-88-0858. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed May 3, 1989. *328 Raymond F. Agrella, of Shearer, Blood, Agrella & Boose, of St.
Joy v. New York State Department of Motor Vehiclespublic domain
Rose, J. Appeals from three judgments of the Supreme Court (Ceresia Jr., J.), entered May 30, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioners’ applications, in three combined proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 and actions for declaratory judgment, to, among other things, review three determinations of respondent Department of Motor Vehicles denying petitioners’ applications for driver’s licenses. Each
Joy v. New York State Department of Motor Vehiclespublic domain
Rose, J. Appeals from three judgments of the Supreme Court (Ceresia Jr., J.), entered May 30, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioners’ applications, in three combined proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 and actions for declaratory judgment, to, among other things, review three determinations of respondent Department of Motor Vehicles denying petitioners’ applications for driver’s licenses. Each
O. F. Shearer & Sons, Inc. v. Deckerpublic domain
349 F.Supp. 1214 (1972) O. F. SHEARER & SONS, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff, v. Charles A. DECKER, Jr., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 2960. United States District Court, S. D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. October 31, 1972. *1215 *1216 R. Michael Shaw, Point Pleasant, W. Va., for plaintiff
Sigmond v. Brownpublic domain
ORDER Raymond P. Boucher is a partner in the firm of Sayre, Moreno, Purcell & Boucher, 10351 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 406, Los Angeles, California 90025. On October 14, 1987 this court issued an order to Boucher that he show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on him for misrepresentations made by him as counsel for Jeremy A. Sigmond in the case of Sigmond v. Brown, et al., decided by an opinion disposition of this
Edwards v. Guardian Life Inspublic domain
Case: 24-60381 Document: 72-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-60381
Sigmond v. Brownpublic domain
645 F.Supp. 243 (1986) Jeremy A. SIGMOND, D.C., Plaintiff, v. Phillip E. BROWN, et al., Defendants. No. CV 83-7861. United States District Court, C.D. California. October 15, 1986. *244 Raymond P. Boucher, Sayre, Moreno, Purcell & Boucher, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. Rick A. Cigel, Wyman, Bautzer, Christensen, Ku
Shearer v. Parkerpublic domain
267 S.W.2d 18 (1954) SHEARER v. PARKER. No. 43697. Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1. April 12, 1954. *19 Edward L. Higbee, Denver, Colo., Watkins & Watkins and Fred M. Wanger, St. Joseph, for appellant. Maurice Pope, St. Joseph, for respondent. CONKLING, Judge. This action originated in the Proba
Votava v. Material Service Corp.public domain
74 Ill. App.3d 208 (1979) 392 N.E.2d 768 RICHARD J. VOTAVA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MATERIAL SERVICE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 78-489. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed July 19, 1979. *209 Raymond Agrella, of Shearer, O'Brien, Blood, Agrella and Boose, of St. Charles, for