Cases

07/29/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 21, 2022 Session BUFFI LYNNE STANCIL EX REL. REBECCA MAE GENTRY v. DOMINION CROSSVILLE, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cumberland County No. CC1-19-CV-6523 J

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

ORDER SAM SPARKS, ÜNITED STATES ’ DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED- on the 20th, 21st, 22nd, and 26th days of October 2015, the Court held a bench trial in the above-style cause, and the parties appeared in person and through counsel. During trial, the Court heard testimony from the follow*664ing witnesses: Roberto Wendt, Matthias Weigel, Richard Heindl

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 601 U. S. Part 2 Pages 480–490 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 16, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.

664 S.E.2d 706 (2008) Joseph FAUBLE and Rebecca Fauble, Plaintiffs below, Appellants v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of Joseph Fauble and Rebecca Fauble, Intervenor, Appellee v. Alex E. Paris Contracting, Inc., Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 33667. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted March 12, 2008. Decided June

670 F.Supp.2d 621 (2009) Ken MOORE, Plaintiff, v. HEXACOMB CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. 1:08-CV-966. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. November 6, 2009. *623 William F. Piper, William F. Piper PLC, Portage, MI, for Plaintiff. William E. Altman, Vercruysse Murray & Calzone PC, Bingham F

¶ 72. REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. {concurring). I agree with the majority opinion's analysis supporting Stietz's entitlement to the self-defense jury instruction and join the opinion. I write separately because the circuit court also erred when it refused to allow Stietz to present a defense based on evidence that the DNR wardens were trespassers on private property, and I disagree with the maj

HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL. TASSIE KATHERINE

The disposition of a former appeal in this case is shown in 143 S.W. 329. The suit was instituted by Adam Parker, administrator of the estate of Pallie Watson, deceased, against F. M. Watson, who, as agent or trustee for Pallie Watson during her lifetime, had received from her certain moneys to be loaned out for her benefit, and upon another receipt executed by F. M. Watson showing that he had received from Pallie Watson for collection certain notes. The two instruments sued on are set

OSCN Found Document:HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only

141 F.3d 1185 98 CJ C.A.R. 1358 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I

MEMORANDUM OPINION M. HANNAH LAUCK, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff Pamela Cappetta’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas to Her Medical Providers. (Docket No. 54.) Defendant GC Services responded to the motion. (Docket No. 61.) The matter has been fully briefed, and the Court held a hearing on January 23, 2009. Accordingly, the Motion is now ripe for adjudication.

618 F.Supp.2d 96 (2009) In re: NEURONTIN MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: Bentley v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-11997-PBS. Bulger v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 07-11426-PBS. Dixon v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-11998-PBS. McGee v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-12593-PBS. Owens v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 05-11017-PBS. Pursey v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., CA No. 07-10106-PBS. Roberson

640 F.Supp.2d 268 (2009) 5 BOROUGH PAWN, LLC, Ruben D. Cabrera, Rebecca Cabrera and Brian Cabrera, Plaintiffs, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Police Department, Commissioner of Police Raymond Kelly and Sergeant Ron Marti, Defendants. No. 08 cv 3837 (CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 22, 2009. *275 Pau

OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Doe. No. 177) and defendants’ Motion to Strike Newly Asserted Bases for Class Certification (Doc. No. 286). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification is denied and defendants’ Motion to Strike is denied as moot.

506 F.Supp.2d 792 (2007) B.H., a minor child, by and through her natural parents and guardians, Billie and Jackie Holder, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOLD FIELDS MINING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs, v. United States of America, et al., Third-Party Defendants. No. 04-CV-0564-CVE-PJC. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. February 1, 2007.

17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN