Cases

MEMORADUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Habakuk Ndzerre (“plaintiff’) brings this action, pro se, against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA” or “defendant”) and Hernando O’Farrell, in his capacity as a Manager for WMATA, alleging, inter alia, violations of the Family and Medical

584 S.E.2d 462 (2003) 41 Va. App. 287 Steven L. WHITE v. REDMAN CORPORATION and Twin City Fire Insurance Company. Record No. 2954-02-2. Court of Appeals of Virginia. August 5, 2003. Stephen T. Harper (Kerns, Kastenbaum & Reinhardt, P.L.C., on brief), Richmond, for appellant. S. Vernon Priddy III (Sands Anderson Marks & Miller,

759 F.2d 90 245 U.S.App.D.C. 70, 53 USLW 2526, 11Media L. Rep. 1777 William P. TAVOULAREAS, Appellant,Peter Tavoulareasv.Philip PIRO.William P. TAVOULAREAS, Appellant,Peter Tavoulareasv.The WASHINGTON POST COMPANY, d/b/a the Washington Post, aDelaware Corporation, et al. Nos. 83-1604, 83-1605. United States Court of Appeals,Distri

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY. WILKEY, Circuit Judge: Horace Bowins appeals from a judgment entered against him by the trial court. We affirm. I. Background Carlondo Alston was riding on a bus operated by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) when the bus collided with an automobile driven by appellant Horace Bowins. Alston was

Norino Properties, LLC, et al. v. Joseph J. Balsamo, No. 1343, September Term, 2020, Opinion by Graeff, J. MARYLAND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — IN BANC REVIEW — SCOPE OF REVIEW Pursuant to Article IV, § 22 of the Maryland Constitution, in banc review by a circuit court panel is permitted “[w]here any trial is conducted by less than three Circuit Judges.” The plain language of Article IV, § 22 provides that in banc review is available only after a trial. A “trial” for purposes of Article IV, § 22 is

Norino Properties, LLC, et al. v. Joseph J. Balsamo, No. 1343, September Term, 2020, Opinion by Graeff, J. MARYLAND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — IN BANC REVIEW — SCOPE OF REVIEW Pursuant to Article IV, § 22 of the Maryland Constitution, in banc review by a circuit court panel is permitted “[w]here any trial is conducted by less than three Circuit Judges.” The plain language of Article IV, § 22 provides that in banc review is available only after a trial. A “trial” for purposes of Article IV, § 22 is

654 S.E.2d 575 (2008) FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. William K. FAVINGER. Record No. 062620. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 11, 2008. *576 Barry J. Dorans (Samuel W. Meekins, Jr.; Wolcott River Gates, on briefs), Virginia Beach, for appellant. Gregory E. Camden (Charlene A. Morring; Montagna Klein Camden, on brief), for appelle

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Reid Eley, a special-education eligible student residing in the District of Columbia, is before this Court for the third time in the last three years in his ongoing fight to obtain a free appropriate public education, as guaranteed by the Individuals with Disabiliti

ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

551 A.2d 1351 (1989) Sherman JANIFER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Redman, Deceased, Appellant, v. Sara D. JANDEBEUR, Appellee. No. 87-1007. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 16, 1988. Decided January 10, 1989. Thomas A. Gentile, with whom Harry W. Goldberg, Chevy Chase, Md., was on the brief, for appellant.</

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REID ELEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14-319 (BAH)(JMF) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPIN

904 F.Supp. 828 (1995) Randall RICCI, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, a Municipal Corporation, Andrew Whowell and Jerome Leonard, Defendants. No. 94 C 7732. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 7, 1995. *829 Lesley Ann Redman and Kenneth N. Flaxman, Kenneth N. Flaxman, P.C., Chicago,

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Randall Ricci was arrested for operating a business without a license, in violation of an Arlington Heights, Illinois ordinance. He subsequently sued the Village of Arlington Heights and the two arresting officers pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming the defendants violated his civil rights by subjecting him to full custodial arrest for vio

MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVID T. THUMA, Bankruptcy Judge. Plaintiff Mary Boehm asks the Court for a declaratory judgment that she validly terminated Alameda Virgin Islands Company, LLC’s (“AVIC’s”) rights under a certain agreement relating to the purchase of stock. Defendants AVIC and Debtor counterclaimed, asserting that Plaintiffs attempted termination was ineffective and asking for specific perfo

43 Wn. App. 542 (1986) 718 P.2d 823 MOUNTAIN STATES CONSTRUCTION CO., ET AL, Appellants, v. TYEE ELECTRIC, INC., ET AL, Respondents. No. 6996-6-III. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. May 1, 1986. *543 Joel E. Smith and Gavin, Robinson, Kendrick, Redman & Pratt, for appel

*556 Opinion HOCH, J. This appeal involves a challenge under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) to certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) and approval of a project to build a new entertainment and sports center (ESC) i

219 F.Supp.2d 710 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, for the Use of BLUMENTHAL-KAHN ELECTRIC LTD. PARTNERSHIP, and Blumenthal-Kahn Electric Ltd. Partnership, Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 02-743-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia. September 4, 2002. *711 Thomas Moore Lawson, Lawso

ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Nineteen hospitals from Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona challenge California’s Medi-Cal reimbursement policies for out-of-state hospitals. Compl. ¶ 1. Plaintiffs filed this action against California’s Department of Health Care Services in

177 Ariz. 84 (1993) 865 P.2d 128 In re the ESTATE OF Lloyd Francis PAGE, deceased, M.P. O'Dea, Personal Representative, Appellant, v. Joyce LITZENBURG, Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 91-0351. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. September 28, 1993. Review Denied January 19, 1994. *86

582 F.Supp. 343 (1983) The NIKA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, a municipal corporation, James Threatt and James Bowers, Defendants. No. 80-0609-CV-W-0. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, W.D. September 27, 1983. On Motions to Amend Judgment February 24, 1984. *344