Cases

[Cite as Reed v. Davis, 2021-Ohio-3757.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : ASHIA G. REED : : Appellate Case No. 29086 Appellant : :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JASPER P. RICHARDSON,1 § § No. 259, 2022 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File

892 P.2d 1063 (1995) Gary E. REED, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. DAVIS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 940172-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. March 28, 1995. *1064 Mark F. James and Terry E. Welch, Salt Lake City, for appellant and cross-appellee. Felshaw King, Kaysville, fo

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DEBORAH BISHOP, ) ) Appellant, )

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 14, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00931-CV DERRICK REED, Appellant V. NYANZA MOORE AND FRIENDS OF NYANZA DAVIS MOORE, Appellees On Appeal from the 239th District Court Brazoria County, Texa

ACCEPTED 06-16-00038-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

Opinion issued February 9, 2017 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00914-CV ——————————— LYMAN S. REED AND LYMAN S. REED FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellants V.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 91 Ronnie Reed was removed from the office of county commissioner of Russell County, district four, by an order of the Russell Circuit Court on April 20, 2006. Reed appeals. We affirm. I. Facts Reed was elected as the commissioner for Russell County, district four; he took offic

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Davis, Justice: Patricia S. Reed, Commissioner of the West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles (hereinafter “DMV”), appeals from a final order of the Circuit Court of Brooke County. The circuit court’s order reversed the decision of the Office of Administrative Hearings (hereinafter “OAH”) that had affirmed DMVs- revocation of the driver’s license of the Respondent, Frederick Staffileno (hereinafter “Mr. Staffileno”). In thi

DAVIS, Judge, concurring. I concur in the result reached by the majority and in the bulk of its analysis. However, I write separately to note the areas of the majority's opinion as to which I disagree. With regard to the trial court's denial of Defendant's motion to dismiss at the close of the evidence, I agree with the majority that because the evidence introduced during Defendant's case-in-chief did not in

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RAYMOND REED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N17C-10-366 EMD ) BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, f/n/a ) Burlington Northern and Santa Fe ) Railway Company,

GREENE, Judge. Embree-Reed, Inc. (Employer) and Jefferson-Pilot Insurance Company (Carrier) (collectively Defendants) appeal from the Opinion and Award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (Commission) awarding Edward Davis (Plaintiff) benefits for temporary total disability and temporary partial disability. Plaintiff sustained a compensable injury when a 120-pound drill was dropped onto his left foot

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 November 1999.

873 S.W.2d 524 (1994) 316 Ark. 575 Raymond Dale DAVIS, Appellant, v. M.E. "Dale" REED, Warden, Appellee. No. 93-1231. Supreme Court of Arkansas. April 11, 1994. Raymond Dale Davis, pro se. Clint Miller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. BROWN, Justice. This appeal is taken from a denial of a petition for a writ

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered February 27, 1992, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs motion to dismiss defendant Bard College’s affirmative defenses interposing the statute of limitations as against the causes of action for violation of the Dram Shop Act and negligence, and order of the same court and Justice, entered on or about February 13, 1992, which granted defendant Botstein’s motion for a change of

The undersigned have reviewed the award based upon the record of the proceedings before the deputy commissioner. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. However, upon much detailed reconsideration of the evidence as a whole, the undersigned reach the same facts and conclusions as those reached by the deputy commissioner, with some minor technical modifications. The Full Commission, in their discretion, have determined that there are no good grounds in t

The Texas Citizens Participation Act (the TCPA) allows a defendant to obtain expedited dismissal of certain legal actions for which the party bringing the action does not establish prima facie support. We conclude that this suit to remove a county official from elected office under chapter 87 of the Texas Local Government Code (the removal statute) is a legal action under the TCPA. However, the TCPA does not apply when a governm

RUCKER, Justice. After a steel fabrication company deposited solid waste on a landowner’s property the landowner filed a complaint seeking damages against multiple parties and on multiple grounds, including a claim for an environmental legal action. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motions with respect to some claims and denied the motions with respect to others. We affirm the trial court in p

Dwyer, J. ¶1 — Statements to law enforcement officers do not implicate the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause where those statements are made under circumstances that, objectively viewed, indicate that the primary purpose of the encounter was to enable the police to meet an ongoing emergency. Here, Cleo Reed appeals from his conviction of assault in the second degree arising from an incident in which he strangled his girl fri